Hmm... maybe you should find out what they are about, then? Blindly supporting a proven fascistic, terrorist group, isn't a good look.
I think he and his buddy Ron believe that if they can get all of my allies on the board to disavow me because of my support for “fascism” (which I’ve explained is really nothing more than deporting illegals, changing our immigration laws, and maintaining the white majority so we don’t become Mexico), that I’ll stop posting here. Not going to happen.
'Isolate the target. Destroy the target'. Like I said yesterday, Alinisky would be proud. Unfortunately for them, I'm onto their stupid game
He knows all about them. You’re witnessing a lawyering tactic known as “hedging”. He leaves just enough wiggle room in his arguments so he can go back and change them later if it is expedient for him to do so, or he wishes to maintain a shred of plausible deniability.
the antifa members target anyone who doesnt agree with them. They are the very entity they pretend to be against.
They sure seem to like to target straight white conservatives. Naturally people that hate straight white conservatives will support Antifa
Nope, no dementia. But in response to your request, here’s the thread so everyone can check the record for themselves: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...back-to-mexico.537138/page-14#post-1069328292 In post #275, where Brewskier’s beliefs came up, and I first posted his prior statements affirmatively endorsing a fascist and white supremacist America. And also an anti-Semitic one for good measure. I’ll repost them here for reference: And then, in post #280, in response to my post referencing Brewskier’s statements, rather than condemn them or even disagree with Brewskier’s position, you started defending him, with “Since when did Ape become a race?” which was in reference to Brewskier’s avatar about “Give apes the vote, you won’t regret it.” In post #297, you directly responded to my post with Brewskier’s statements calling for a fascist and racist America quoted above. And again, instead of condemning Brewskier’s statements or positions, you defended them with: “So wanting to preserve your race and heritage makes one a racist? If so, then every single person of every race on the planet is racist. Well, except for American liberals” In post #305, now being aware of Brewskier’s statements for a fascist and white supremacist American, you continued defending him, demanding that “Now quote where I or Brew specifically compared blacks to monkeys.” Because someone who is calling for a fascist, racist America couldn’t have intended a racial slur with the monkey vote avatar, right? In pot #361, you continued to defend Brewskier and his statements, because instead of condemning them, you attacked me for calling “everyone” a fascist and racist. We had several conservative members in that thread denounce Brewskier’s racist and fascist positions and statements, but not you. In my post #383, I wrote: “You intentionally and purposely defended racist, bigoted, fascist statements and the person making them. When I asked why would do that, you dodged answering.” And instead of denying you did that, you admitted doing so in post #384: “Sorry you didn't like, or accept my answer to your stupid question, but it was answered. And if not wanting illegals flooding the country, draining resources, and turning the US into Venezuela makes me a racist, bigot, fascist, nazi, or whatever the insult du jour is, then guilty as charged.” In post #385, I asked: “So you admit you condone and agree with Brewskier's statements I quoted. Congratulations. I'll put you on the list for future reference.” You had the perfect opportunity do deny what I claimed, but you did not. Instead, you wrote: "Admit that I don't want the country turning into Venezuela? Absolutely." In post #393, I gave you yet another opportunity, to deny that you supported Brewskier's positions and statements: “And you've been defending him and his statements constantly in this thread. And now you're saying you don't agree with his statements? Which is it?" The next morning, you gave a long, rambling post (#427), but you did not deny that you had been defending Brewskier or his statements, and you did not deny that you supported Brewskier's statements and positions, or that you even disageed with them. You did say that you could not agree or denounce the Brewskier’s anti-Semitic statement, “cause i have no idea.” So we have a very complete record where you were repeatedly confronted with the fascist, racist statements by Brewskier, which several conservatives affirmatively stated they denounced and rejected. And yet you refused to denounce them, you refused to disagree with them, you refused to deny you supported them, and you repeatedly and continuously defended him after you knew his statements and positions, and you never denied doing so. So I am very comfortable that the record supports my statements about you defending Brewskier’s fascist and racist statements and positions. But just like yesterday where you had multiple opportunities to do so, you can tell me I’m wrong, and state for the board and the record that you do not agree with Brewskier’s fascist, racist, statements about a fascist, white supremacist America, and set the record straight. Why you wouldn't just do so is evident to me, but others can decide for themselves.
Can you quote and link my post where you claim I am "blindly supporting" antifa as you claimed? Thank you. Not that I'd think you'd just make **** up or anything. I never claimed to be an antifa expert. I did report that based on my quick research, there is no record of "antifa" killing anyone. Quite unlike the neo-nazi and KKK types they stand up against. If you have any information that that fact is wrong, I'll be happy to consider it.
So since they don't agree with fascists, neo-nazi and the KKK, they target fascists, neo-nazis, and KKK guys. I suppose that makes sense.
So straight white conservatives are fascists, neo-nazi and KKK? I wouldn't make that kind of over-broad statement, but I can see it coming from you.
Are you joking? Heck, read the post I am quoting here. "I never claimed to be an antifa expert." What can this mean; other than being blind to what Antifa-terrorists are? "Quite unlike the neo-nazi and KKK types they stand up against." What is this lie; if not an attempt to defend Antifa-terrorists?
lol, i guess now we know what your little folder is for! I"m certainly not playing your stupid little game again.
No. What can it means? It means I never claimed to by an antifa expert. And exactly how is that me saying I "blindly support antifa" as you falsely claimed? I'm not saying I blindly support them at all. Here for the record is my actual full statement, with the parts that you "failed" to post: I never claimed to be an antifa expert. I did report that based on my quick research, there is no record of "antifa" killing anyone. Quite unlike the neo-nazi and KKK types they stand up against. I am stating a fact, which you have not rebutted. There is no record about antifa killing anyone. Quite unlike the neo-nazi and KKK types they stand up against. I'm not defending antifa, just stating a fact. But let me use your logic. Why are you supporting neo-nazi and KKK terrorist murderers?[/QUOTE]
Wise. But the board can note you've had another easy opportunity to deny that you have supported and defended Brewskier's fascist and racists statements for a fascist white-supremacist America, and once again refuse to do so. I guess because its a "stupid little game."
