US study lays bare extreme pay-ratio problem

Discussion in 'Economics & Trade' started by LafayetteBis, May 16, 2018.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol, they of course did not.
     
  2. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    if true why so afraid to present an example?
     
  3. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol, they of course did
    ( to rahl this is debating)
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
  4. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Aristotle was a libertarian and so were our founders who created a tiny tiny govt that today's libertarians would die for!
     
  5. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did. Thinking “libertarians” existed prior to 1971. Lol
     
  6. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure you do. We talked about it last time.

    When the private lord decides to up your rent, you have no problem whatsoever with him resorting to use of force to throw the tenant out in the street.

    And since there are no public roads in your libertarian utopia, the private lord and throw him out of the street as well.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But you know they did not.

    And this isn’t a debate with you. This is pointing out how moronic conservatives are.
     
  8. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is a perfect example of what I’m talking about. Lol.

    December of 1971 Jimmie. No such thing before then.
     
  9. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know they did!
    ( to rahl this is debating)
     
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But you know they did not.

    And this isn’t a debate with you. This is pointing out how moronic conservatives are.
     
  11. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    this is point out how moronic liberals are
    ( this is debate to rahl)
     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s amusing that you can’t see how ridiculous you come off. Lol
     
  13. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    embarrassed yet?


    Libertarianism is a collection of political philosophies and movements that uphold liberty as a ... Thefirst recorded use of the term "libertarian" was in 1789, when William Belsham .
     
  14. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s amusing that you can’t see how ridiculous you come off.
    (this is liberal rahls idea of debating)
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
  15. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you talking about trespassing? Violating the another's property? The right to eject trespassers is not unique to libertarianism. That's basic law.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
  16. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I didn't say it was unique to libertarian.

    Just pointing out the hypocrisy of your claim about how your against the use of force.

    You're all for use of force to enforce the private lord's will.

    You just don't want a government that might limit the private lord's power.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  17. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe I said they oppose the use of force "to violate the person or property of one's fellow man".
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
  18. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you mean to enforce natural law, the term used by Cicero and all the great Western freedom philosophers up to Locke and Jefferson.
     
  19. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly. And when the private lord who owns the housing ups the rend on the working guy living their, you support violating the person and property of "one's fellow man" by that the tenatns persona and his property and thowing them out in the street, though because the private lord owns the street as well, throwing the person and property of "one's fellow man" into the ditch.

    You pretend to be so righteous with your philosophy about how "it's wrong to use force to violate the person or property of one's fellow man."

    But that's bullshit. The truth is you have no problem whatsoever with the use of force to impose the private lord's will over the "person or property of one's fellow man".

    You just don't want a government to be able to limit or regulate the private lord's power.

    Sounds like utopia. If you're the private lord. Just like in the good old days of fuedalism.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  20. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    why would you assume the govt lord knows the best price for housing and everything else?
     
  21. Iriemon

    Iriemon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    82,348
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would you assume that I assume that?
     
  22. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  23. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s amusing that you can’t see how ridiculous you come off. Lol
     
  24. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    right because they regulate based on guessing not natural law and millions die like they did under Stalin and Mao and Pol POt
     
  25. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s amusing that you can’t see how ridiculous you come off

    ( this is debate to liberal rahl)
     

Share This Page