Justin Amash is talking now. Remember that he is proof that, at a minimum, the vote for impeachment will not be solely supported by the Democrats.
IF (as you claim) there is real "evidence" against Biden, then why isn't he in Jail? Sounds to me like this "evidence" is non-existent. Plus, Biden's situation has Zero to do with Trump's Impeachment and is only RW distractive whataboutism.
Obama and Hillary Clinton interfered in the 2016 election, soliciting the Russians, UK and Aussie and the FBI directed by Comey interfered in a Presidential Administration. Where is your "outrage". All we get is your denials and refusal to accept facts. Trump uncovered Biden's corruption which should be celebrated since their was so much maleficence in the Obama Administration and with Joe's coke snorting son.
Schiff is handling Nadler's role at the moment and he recognized him. It was short, but I am not sure that I saw enough to support him as one of the House Managers in the Senate. But I can see the political benefit, so it will be interesting to see if they select him as such.
Just more "whataboutism"? Do you have any "contribution" that is directly relevant to the Current Impeachment?
Quid pro quo are fine for democrats and the republicans are not making a mountain out of a molehill like the dem clown show is.
And all of those servers were no longer working when Trump made the comment. And I don't think you know how the cloud works. All that the cloud does is make it to where something can be pulled from a server remotely. Nothing is actually in the clouds. Its all on physical servers. Once the server is no longer connected to the net then that information is no longer available unless saved on another server or computer. Do you really think that Hillary gave those 30k emails to her staffers and the DNC/DCCC in the midst of an investigation? Well...Hillary is pretty dumb.....But I don't think she's THAT dumb. Still waiting on you to comment on the rest of my post like you said you would...interesting how you've had time to and have responded to several posts since then.
That will be a fascinating question.... I personally think there is only a small chance that happens, but I agree on the optics... Maybe give him a spot but limit his time-on-ice (to steal a hockey term)?
All I can do is point you to the findings from the Mueller investigation on this fact. I am not inclined to accept your opinion over the experts he used in that investigation on that fact.
As Trump pointed out when he did his 'independent' skit, the dude is massively conflicted with a Chinese financial interest. For him, impeachment is entirely business(literally.). I'd have respected him more if he did it as a Republican, instead of the 'independent' charade that just isn't true lol.
You are still dodging. Do not expect me to answer your strawman until you can actually answer. Trump asked China and Ukraine to investigate his domestic political opponent while standing on the lawn of the White House. He also asked Russia to release illegally obtained emails of his domestic political opponent to the Press. That is not an invitation to interfere in the US election because it is free speech? That's your argument?
The house Democrats are not a reliable source of information. They are flat out lying to the American people. All of there arguments have been debunked.
Says the guy who has yet to defend his own position. You are still dodging. Do not expect me to answer your strawman until you can actually answer. Trump asked China and Ukraine to investigate his domestic political opponent while standing on the lawn of the White House. He also asked Russia to release illegally obtained emails of his domestic political opponent to the Press. That is not an invitation to interfere in the US election because it is free speech? That's your argument?