Weather station in Antarctica records high of 65, the continent's hottest temperature ever

Never use a Youtube video to explain a conspiracy.

When did Climate Change occur in the past that was "faster and more widespread?" What were the causes?

 

I am not backing down. I will gladly provide the proof - as I have many times before - but you need to first explain what qualifies as proof to you. You never have outside of saying something like "actual data."

And "actual data" is about as much of a non-answer as saying that the reason for climate change is "Earth."

 

I quoted the title of the article - that's a rule at PF.

Again, die on the mole hill if you must.

 

So...because I don't know whether CO2 rose faster or slower 50 million years ago....then what? It is impossible to understand the cause of the current rise in CO2? It is impossible to evaluate whether the current rise in CO2 and temperatures are human influenced?

 

Its not a conspiracy. Its pretty much a fact.

Go watch the evidence you requested.

 

Then provide the hard data that proves your BS claim that humans are the primary cause for climate change.

You do realize we did this dance days ago, you posted your fake evidence, I exposed it and you backed down.

But I'm ready to do it again. Go for it.

 

I'm not going to watch the videos, so just summarize.

Tell me when climate change was faster and more widespread than the current one we are experiencing and tell me the likely causes.

 

Again, "hard data" just as much of a non-answer as "actual data."

Give me an example. Do you want temperature measurements? An explanation of greenhouse gases? An analysis of the isotopes for the atmospheric CO2?

 

Then it shows you have no basis to confirm anything because temps rose faster and slower, CO2 rose faster and slower, O2 rose faster and slower and the earth's climate has been going through massive changes before and during man walking the earth.

 

Then you posted fake news, like I said earlier.

 

You own that mole hill.

 

You own that fake news.

 

You have no basis for claiming "temps rose faster and slower, CO2 rose faster and slower, O2 rose faster and slower." You just said that it is possible and I can't prove it didn't.

 

https://www.preceden.com/timelines/186943-history-of-the-earth
Oh my, huge stuff, that's almost as bad as the Indians in the Himalayas worshiping my father for being the destroyer god, DDT, yeah, big changes. Like the making of those mountains big, really big, really. Obviously when big stuff moves it makes mountains and volcanoes and bigger changes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himalayas#Geography_and_key_features

Bigger and faster then doesn't change our contributions today.

 

No but SARS, CoronaVirus, Ebola are always only a few nutters eating road kill away from reverting survivors to the stone age.

 

Sweet Gaia herself pours more **** in the air every year. Humans only produce 3-4% of the Earth's CO2. If there is a problem you need to start looking at the real big producers, and leave us alone. Of course you won't because you can't tax nature, only idiots that buy into your fraud...

 

Going back even to the dinosaurs is ridiculous, mass extinction event changes entire planet. What we need is a Yellowstone to pop it's cap, again, then we can say climate change is not our fault and be right.

 

What we need is a good old fashioned Black Death protection genome.

 

How many times are you going to do this dance?

You made a BS claim but you made it that its been proven humans are the primary source of climate change.

Its time to prove that claim with actual evidence to prove it. Time to pay the piper.

 

Ok, let me put it another way, fitness junkies know a high sugar and carbohydrate intake destroys your body so they never take in a high sugar product or high carbohydrates. They don't go to the store to buy $200.00 worth of junk food so they can eat one chip, one small spoon of ice cream, one tip of a slice of pie, (you get the picture) and throw the rest away.

It's not the hypocrisy of the issue at hand. It's pushing a narrative, knowing that you're not increasing a dangerous carbon footprint by flying in a jet, and knowing that the million dollar mansion you bought on the beach isn't in any danger of a flood due to icebergs melting.

They're making hand over fist in funding, pushing a narrative that doesn't pose a danger.

 

Ever heard of the Barksdale Bubble? Barksdale is a military base located in Bossier City/Shreveport, LA. There are rumors that there is a force field of sorts that cause light weather disturbances to miss the base. Sometimes you can pull up a weather map and see it.I live near Barksdale and work in Bossier City, here's a screenshot I took when I noticed the bubble.

 

Yes, I already crushed your argument in another thread and you refuse to accept facts. We also know for a fact that there was more O2 and more CO2 over the course of the history of earth than what we have now.

Your political agenda and lack of Geological knowledge always sink your arguments. Not to mention your sheer lack of facts and data over the course of millions of years.

 

The CO2 cycle does emit CO2 into the atmosphere in the fall...and then it absorbs that CO2 in the spring.

We can measure the isotopes of the CO2 found in the upper atmosphere and thereby determine that the type of CO2 which is accumulating year to year is the type created by the combustion of fossil fuels.

 

Once again, you fail to even identify the type or amount of evidence that would qualify as proof.

"Hard data" just as much of a non-answer as "actual data."

Give me an example. Do you want temperature measurements? An explanation of greenhouse gases? An analysis of the isotopes for the atmospheric CO2?

 

Missing the 96-97% that has nothing to do with us. Plus its fall somewhere all the time. Not seeing your point at all...