well known homosexual director accused of assulting 15 year old boy in his mansion

Sick bastard. If its true I hope he gets the max. Using money and drugs to take sexual advantage of boys. Despicable

Famous Hollywood director Bryan Singer has been accused in a new federal lawsuit of sexually abusing a 15-year-old boy.

The suit, filed Wednesday in federal court in Hawaii, accused the 48-year-old “X-Men” filmmaker of first preying on the 15-year-old aspiring actor at a party at a California mansion where underage boys were plied with drugs and alcohol and taken advantage of.

“The stories that I’ve heard of what went on at the estate are truly despicable,” the accuser’s lawyer, Miami attorney Jeff Herman, told the Daily News Wednesday night.

Herman identified the accuser as Michael Egan III. Egan, who is now in his 30s and will appear at a Thursday news conference at the Four Seasons Hotel in L.A., was forcibly sodomized by the director when he was 15 in the late-1990s, according to the suit. Singer had promised Egan a role in one of his movies and had numerous sexual encounters with the boy when he was 15 and 16, Herman told The News. Singer also allegedly brought Egan to Hawaii for multiple extended trips when he was 17.

Another Harvey Milk in the making if true. Perhaps he should get a stamp as well.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...lly-abusing-15-year-old-boy-article-1.1759389

 

If the charges are true, I hope that Singer is convicted and imprisoned.

Sounds like another Roman Polanski- the well known heterosexual director who used drugs and money to take advantage of a 14 year old girl. Still pisses me off that he served any time in jail.

 

Not really since this man is a homosexual not a heterosexual.

That's a bit like equating Jeffery Dalmer's sex with underage boys with Carlie Rose Attebury's sex with underage boys.

 

Not really?

Other than one being a homosexual and the other being a heterosexual- what are the significant differences that you see?

Or are you just admitting that it only matters to you when the accused is homosexual?

 

Uuuugh...we've got alot of sexual predators it seems. If true I hope Singer gets locked up.....but part of me knows he wont.

 

I am surprised this took as long as it did to show up. I am also curious why the guys waited this long to come forward. I wonder if there was an attempt at extortion.

 

hollywood is so gross nowadays. Grown men doping up little boys and wanting to fondle them. Its disgusting. Good on this young lad for blowing the whistle on this. He will never act after this in hollywood but ...oh well.

 

Yep- I don't why the sexuality of the perp needs to be mentioned. Oh wait- yes, I do. It's the usual attempt to paint all gay people with the same brush. Polanski got away with it. I bet the OP doesn't even know who we're talking about though.

- - - Updated - - -

If it happened, he will.

 

Corey Feldman indicated that the sexual abuse of minors is not uncommon in Hollywood, with him apparently being one of its victims.

As for this story, it troubles me that the person waited so long, apparently continued the relationship with the alleged accuser, and is now suing him for money as opposed to having sought criminal charges against him. I tend to be skeptical of the forcible part of the story.

 

Wish I was as confident as you are Leekohler, but Michael Jackson skated away paying people off. I have a feeling Singer would be able to as well.

Hope I'm wrong.

 

Of course that's what it is. They only care about child abuse if a homosexual does it. Heterosexual child abuser? Totally fine. You'll never see them mention it- never.

 

Funny how you NEVER read, a homosexual WOMAN takes advantage of a child! Worth noting. (Straight or gay, be honest, PREDATORY behavior is still STATISTICALLY the domain of the one gender).

 

Let's see how this plays out. So far, there's been no claim of evidence. You never know what this could be. It's suspiciously coinciding with his new film release. Kind of convenient for the alleged victim.

 

I agree that men are more predatory than women, but women have been known to take advantage of underage boys too.

 

wrong. read some books of ex tennis players on the WTA tour. The locker rooms are said to be full of vampires for the young girls on the tour. Go ask Martina Hingis and Kournikova.

women do it as well.

sexist much?

 

agreed about Polanski, he, like Michael Jackson should never have gotten away with the pedophilia. But sadly, we see cases like Doug Robert Figueroa, the 6-3, 240 pound homosexual pedophile who got no jail time for kidnapping and having gay sex with a little boy.

I too wonder why this guy waited so long to report the homosexual molestation and also question if perhaps there is not some back story such as a lover scorned etc. Like with Harvey Milk, the victim was under age and hopefully prosecution occurs.

 

I gave you the example that proved my point but you cut it off. Why did you do that?

- - - Updated - - -

You mean like boys molested by priests?

Are they less believable as well because they didn't report until they were adults?

http://www.joshuachildrensfoundation.org/clergyabuse.php

 

That would be incorrect.


Even now, at night when I close my eyes, I can sometimes still hear her. Footsteps crunching on the gravel path, growing louder as she nears the cabin. There’s a pause as she inhales and exhales one last drag on her Salem before crushing it out in the dirt. The screen door whines as she teases it open. Then she tiptoes across the rough wood floor to my bed, and on clear nights her body casts a shadow over mine in the moonlight.

It was the summer before the Beatles, before Kennedy got assassinated, before sex. I mean, other people had had sex, obviously, just nobody I knew.

I was 14. She was 28.

http://www.blogher.com/sexual-abuse-all-girls-summer-camp?page=full

And another

Federal criminal charges have been filed against a 29-year-old Wallingford woman accused of sexually abusing a 3-year old girl, filming the abuse with her cell phone and e-mailing the video to someone in California.

http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/...ilming-Abuse-Federal-Officials-224592151.html

 

Far, far more rare- men outnumber female pedophiles by about a 20:1 ratio.

- - - Updated - - -

Far, far more rare- men outnumber female pedophiles by about a 20:1 ratio.

 

Well I am glad to see you concerned about a heterosexual rapist(Polanski)- thanks

Of course the difference between this case and Milk is that there is- and was- no victim accusing Milk of committing any crime.

Polanski however was accused- arrested, and plead guilty to sex with a 14 year old girl- and then skipped the country.

 

It doesn't matter to them. Polanski is heterosexual, so it's OK.

- - - Updated - - -

And I don't know why these continue to be permitted.

 

So let Bryan Singer try to seek asylum if not in France then where ever his movies are popular. Otherwise he better not escape the prosecutors. And the only reason why Polanski escaped justice was because he did not practice what the judge told him, mainly not to hang out at parties. When he did and pissed off the judge, he then got asylum arguing he would not get a fair trial.

 

This?
That's a bit like equating Jeffery Dalmer's sex with underage boys with Carlie Rose Attebury's sex with underage boys.

Because I have no idea who Attebury is, and I don't see any relationship to this with Dahmer.

Again- there is no essential differences between the accusations here- Singer accused of using drugs and money to seduce a 15 year old boy- Polanski convicted of using drugs and money to seduce a 14 year old girl- other than Singer being a homosexual.

So it would appear that whether an accused is a homosexual or not is the only thing that matters to you.

- - - Updated - - -

Again assuming that these charges are correct- then I would hope that Singer is not allowed to flee the country like Polanski was.

 

Just so we're clear- it appears to me that this is a civil suit, not criminal prosecution. Is that right? If that's the case, then Singer faces no jail time at all, just loss of money.

 

My bad- turns out that Tex is more right than he realized.

My comparison to Polanski was flawed

Polanski was accused, arrested and convicted in a criminal court of seducing a 14 year old girl.
Singer has been accused- and is being sued- in a civil court.

Why hasn't Singer's accuser sought criminal conviction? Generally people will wait until a criminal conviction because winning a civil complaint after someone has been found guilty of the action is far easier.

If there has been no criminal action it is likely that either:
a) that no DA believed that there was enough evidence to support a charge or
b) that they didn't even want to bring criminal charges because they just want to shake a settlement out of Singer.