Well the socialized medicine death panel did their dirty deed in England

Nothing like resorting to complete and utter lies in order to push your cute agenda. Would expect nothing else from you.

 

He has not a whit of shame. Truly a disgusting little t urd.

 

So where is this truth that anyone has said the child should be shot in the head?

 

Don't like facts, lie through your little broken teeth.

 

How is a question an ad hominem?

 

In his addled mind, they do. If a doctor, scientist, or just about anybody has an informed opinion that varies from his ideology, they are a clueless prog.

 

The cruel irrational use of government force to seize the child from his parents and bar their choice of another licensed physician is the kind of in your face abuse of government power that makes ordinary human beings fear government.

The treatment of the parents and their child by the NHS renews the instinctive natural fear that all human beings have for physicians - an inherently dangerous profession.

Thousands of years of reassuring "Do No Harm" is being quickly undermined by these phony "mercy killings".
If the Brits and their NHS insist on killing human beings they should use vets - who actually know how to do it.

 

Facts are often the first political casualties.

 

Maybe you could start a thread in the conspiracy forum.

 

As proven by you and the OP.

 

Not one single fact!

 

Even the doctors in the US who the kids parents claimed could magically cure him said the best they could do was let him live for a year instead of six months. And he would be in agonizing pain the whole time because any amount of pain killer that is enough to kill his pain would also cause him to overdose and wouild kill him. So, the court decided his parents choice was not in his best interests because it would cause him agonizing pain without any real chance of him surviving. They decided a relatively painless (compared to what he would go through if his parents had won) death was more in his interest than what his parents wanted. The court made the right choice.

 

Be specific.

 

As proven by you.

 

Specifically there was not one single fact in your post.

 

What conspiracy?

 

LOL! Read you own posts.

 

The conspiracy outlined in your post.

 

I asked you a question because based on your post you seem to have some kind of disorder that prevents you from having a debate with any kind of intellectual honesty.

 

Again, you refuse to answer a direct reasonable question. Pure politics.

 

Again all you have to do to prove me wrong, is show one single fact in your post!

 

Still no substantive rebuttal from you. Very telling.

 

You have yet to offer an example of a single inaccuracy from my post. I wonder why?

 

Because it is all opinion, not facts. You appear to not understand the difference!

 

That is an irrational ad hominem personal attack. That sort of thing has no place in an honest debate. Look it up.