WHAT WOULD YOU DO ABOUT NORTH KOREA?

what a freakn joke.

Why Libya Gave Up on the Bomb

How bout you tell us why Obama supported the invasion of Libya?

 

I would not draw stupid red lines like Trump and threat nuclear war if they cross it, which they already have btw, now Trump looks like a idiot... Sad!

 

Why are you sharing an article from 2004 when the US didn't launch AIRSTRIKES (where the **** are you getting invasion?) until 2011?

 

so we should use nukes as a first option in a preemptive attack, is that what Trump supporters think

I think Trump supporters would still support Trump if he shot someone, Trump was right

 

Cause that's the only legitimate reason why Obama would support the invasion of Libya.

Why don't you tell me why Obama invaded Libya and syria

 

Trump should know what to do, Trump already thinks like him

 

You don't believe a you attack the US and we will attack you with overwhelming force is an appropriate red line?

 

The Libyan army was moving on Benghazi to massacre the anti-Gaddafi forces and the civilians who supported them.

 

The anti gaddafi forces supported by Obama, included Al Queada.

They were all ****ing terrorists, and after gaddafi got sodomized with a knife by American backed terrorists, America sent those terrorists and all the weapons they could carry to Syria for another invasion.

 

Because the anti-Gaddafi forces were a centralized monolithic entity?

 

If we assume that Kim is pursuing a nuke as a way to maintain his regime and that failure to field a working nuke as a threat means he might end up Like Ghadafi or Sadam, then the question becomes, what will it take to convince him that the US will leave him alone if e dismantles his nuke program?

Perhaps we could persuade Russia and China to enter into a pact with the DPRK where an attack against the DPRK is an attack against all. In return, Kim agrees to give up his program (and perhaps end the armistice with NK).

In return, the US would enter into a pact with Japan and South Korea similar to the Pact between Russa China and the DPRK.

Of course, the terms of the agreement would have to be very carefully spelled out and the devil would be in the details, but what other realistic options do we have?

What do you think?

 

Negotiation is the only choice, there is none other.

 

Well I'll admit that's thinking outside the box, but we're already in a defense pact with South Korea and Japan.

 

And war mongering is for ****s. Specially when your using other people lives to destroy, if you would be put into this scenario , you would be whimpering and pissing in your pants. Your siting at home eating fried food and getting fat, while you start nuclear wars in your living room with other people lives. Your a simple minded wimp.

 

Wimp that knows nothing except nuke them.

 

Scum bag is doing nothing other then sitting next to you eating fried foods and getting fat , you and the president can make war and nuke them from the safety of your living room. Scum bag has no clue and the laughter that shakes the world when someone suggests he does has actually caused earthquakes all over the world.

 

The last lifeboat for protecting their mental case president is jumping to Clinton and Obama with the usual 75% lies. That's not even a response weakling, it's hardly a whimper even.

 

How has that worked out the last 20 and what are we going to use to negotiate? What if NK refuses as they have done, how do you force them to negotiate?

 

I think China and Russia wouldn't agree to such a pact.

 

I would bet that they would. It would take negotiation but NK wants security from our incessant law breaking, as we have done in the middle east. NK looked at what happened in Libya once they gave up their nuclear program. They are not irrational as our CIA news outlets propagandize us, fooling all but americans who pay attention and are critical thinkers, and there are not that many of us. We have a few here, but most are just easy marks for propaganda, where in the past we were just smarter people. We used to want to stay our of wars, now far too many, perhaps because we do not draft anymore, seems to be entertained by war, not having to put our own skin in the game. An accurate but troubling observation.

 

What do Russia and China gain?

 

Careful, I got a warning for personal attacks. I am working hard to avoid future infractions but I understand your position. Vietnam made me grow up and far too many americans who would never volunteer to fight do their war mongering on video games. Armchair generals. Only veterans who are sociopaths want war, IMO. But these non vets will not volunteer, but war is entertainment for these cowards, and not talking about anyone here specifically, just a generalization. I know personally some of these coward bastards.

 

Clearly unlike our gov't they are rational actors and want security from American invasion for NK. It it us our gov't who refuse to give NK security from our illegal habitual neocon invasions. Hell, I do not trust my own gov't, and only a damned idiot would. The brain dead idiot ignore the propaganda, the false flags, the lies coming from our CIA fed media. Yet how much damned evidence does one need? Ignorance and denial is idiotic.

 

Now that China says they will not allow the USA to strike first without retaliation, the game has changed.

we need a diplomatic solution.

first strike is no longer an option.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/0...lity-unless-us-strikes-north-korea-first.html

 

So Russia and China take on a liability that they then ha ve to commit to defend and you believe they'll think the liability itself is their reward?

You are woefully naive.