When does one gain person-hood?

Actually anyone who reads the board know that is a lie.

 

They know I make valid points, that is why they have never put me on ignore.

 

Yeah really. If a fetus is killed in Missouri and it's not during the commission of a federal offense then there's no "fetal homicide".

 

Sure there is, it just doesn't fit within the language of the law as a crime. The homicide still has happened.

 

Fine Whaler. Why don't you just save everyone the trouble of looking up posts from months and months ago and simply clarify your current stance on abortion and women who have been raped and impregnated. Should they be allowed to terminate their pregnancies, yes or no?

We'll save the post and keep it on record.

 

You said:

I said:

In Missouri it is not a child in utero by "actual legal definition" unless it happens to die during the commission of one of a limited number of federal offenses. If it were a child in utero "by actual legal definition" then the person killing the fetus would be charged with some sort of fetal homicide offense. You may call it a child in utero. Other people may call it a child in utero. "By actual legal definition" it is not.

 

So are you saying it is possible for an entity to be a human being in one situation, but not in another just because the situation is different? Is that logical?

 

Definately it is not logical nor possible. The laws are in conflict.

This is what happens when folks try and ram through laws on the basis of religion rather than science.

The reason the definition of personhood was changed was because Bush changed it, without consulting subject matter experts.

The law was changed on the basis of his religious beliefs rather than reality.

 

The law had very little to do with religion.

So Bush passed this law without Congress' involvement? Who controlled congress at the time (I don't expect a response here)?

More delusion

 

Yet you somehow think Bush single handedly passed this law?
The delusion of the left is astonishing!

 

The law is not reality, lol. The law does many things that are not logical, for instance:
By law, a corporation is at times considered to be a PERSON/HUMAN BEING, and we all know that it is no such thing.
The same holds true here, a FETUS is sometimes BY LAW considered to be human, when we all know it is not.

 

By the way, anyone that considers "the law" to be logical has no concept of what law is, or else they are nuts.

 

Dude this is funny!

 

Thread closed.

Start another if you wish to continue the discussion.