Whites OBJECTIVELY Have Less Rights than Minorities

You can tell the difference between a Norwegian and all the other inferior white people, including other Scandinavians, because Norwegians tend to be much better looking than everyone else.

 

Is the Quinault Indian Nation beach part of the Quinault Reservation? That would be the difference.

 

Thank you.

 

Why would that matter???

Apartheid is Apartheid

 

How tall are you???

 

You don't need to have been alive 232 years ago. If you are a classified as a "White Male" in this society, then you have already benefited. If you don't know that, then I would strongly suggest that such lack of knowledge about who and what you are is your major problem. I was not here 232 years go - my Ancestors were. The notion that you don't belong to the History of your Ancestor's is your primary problem. The question is, when did you become disconnected from your Ancestral History and Lineage, to the point where you think you are living outside of and unaffected by that History?

You may not have been to those places. If you are a US Citizen (I should preface my remarks with that because this is about alleged "Racism" in America) and you are what society classifies as "White" (I don't because I know what you are and it is definitely not White), then you are part of a paradigm that glorifies all things "White," worships that which is "White," caters to that which is "White" and refuses to acknowledge anything that is not (allegedly) "White." Inside such a paradigm is exactly where you obtain your "privilege." The fact that you struggle to comprehend this fact is highly telling of the successful brainwashing that paradigm has completed in you.

What University is this? Name it.

If this is true, I'll come there myself and tear down that sign. That would be total BS, if it were true. No "Colored Person" in the United States of America, should ever expect a standard that was rejected and/or forced upon their Ancestors. Name the University and I'll be on the phone first thing in the morning doing my due diligence.

What's the purpose of posting signage that's unreadable??? You post one sign straight out of South Africa and another that cannot be seen given the lighting. Try again and I'll tell you - if you are asking a valid question.

 

Now, for the record, here is my Uncle. Not a photo you are going to find easily online (though there is an outside chance you could). What makes this photo highly unique and very valuable to me personally, is that my Father took it while they were both serving their country. My Father, was one of my Uncle's Crew Chiefs before my Uncle transitioned into the F4 Phantom:



What's important to note about this man, is that he was the first "Black" four star general in the United States Military and he was the first "Black" CINC NORAD. So, he had command authority second only to the Secretary of Defense and the President of the United States over missiles much larger and far more capable than that AIM-9L he's leaning on with his right hand. He is the one who inspired me.

Me in my prime:


Me today:




And, I (hopefully) inspired my son in his prime (hopefully you can see the resemblance):


The heritage continues and it is one that I am exceedingly proud of. And, yes all Black Men do look alike!

 

No doubt about it.

 

Yeah I know you believe in the invisible unmeasurable force that you call, "white male privilege," you believe all white people are racist whether they know it or not and black people are not capable of racism.

You believe all the accomplishments of a white male are the result of their privilege and not their individual effort and yadda yadda yadda...

Therefore you are unable to comprehend the irony of students chanting black power while simultaneously calling white people racist...

Students demand a ban of all white males from campus.

A white male professor goes to campus anyway and receives death threats and has to be escorted off campus by the police for his safety...

Students form liberal terror squads and carry baseball bats and batons as a warning to any other white male who may come to campus to get an education or do their job.

Students form a mob chanting, "black power, black power, black power," while cornering white people minding their own business and accusing them of racism



This makes sense to you because you believe all white people are racist whether they know it or not and black people are not capable of racism

 

Do you have any single daughters???

 

Let's get down to the bottom line of your Education.

First, there is nothing superior about you. Second, you are not "White" and I am not "Black." You are not "Norwegian," nor am I "African American." Third, there is more than one upright, bipedal, sentient and corporeal Species on this planet today. One is Fully Human and the other is Animal Human Hybrid. This is not my personal opinion. This is NOT said to injure or hurt you. This is the Science of Biology and in specific the subset or branch of Microbiology known as Genetics. Here is your starting point: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110718085329.htm.

All I care about is the Truth. For 2,538 years the truth about my Ancestors has been hidden, shrouded and layered in mystery by Western Academics who knew better and did so intentionally. That process is what you were born into. Ergo, you know only what this current Paradigm has taught you. You have been "mis-educated" and highly misinformed about the world around you. Nothing on this planet is what it appears to be on the surface. Not you, and not me.

When you call yourself "White" or "Norwegian" - you do so in completely and utter ignorance of the biological reality that make you what you are on the basis of genetics. On that level, you are Animal Human Hybrid. All of your Ancestors were Animal Human Hybrids. Only one of your Ancestors was Fully Human and she can be traced to approximately 1,100 kilometers southwest of what you now call Kenya, Africa, several hundred thousand years ago. The lie you have been told is that all of Humanity extended from the same branch. This cannot be true. If it were the truth, then Original Sub-Saharan People, would also have Neanderthal DNA. They do not. Some of their latter descendants do, but no Original Sub-Saharan Person has ever had Neanderthal DNA, nor have they ever had RH Positive Blood. However, you do have Neanderthal DNA and RH Positive Blood. All of your Ancestors have Neanderthal DNA and RH Positive Blood.

This proves that there are two (2) fully sentient, fully corporeal, bipedal and upright Species walking the earth today. One is Human and the other is Caucasian. Caucasian never meant "White." Caucasian never meant "European" exclusively. Caucasian was renamed in science. In science, its name was Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Prior to Homo Sapiens Sapiens, was Caucasoid, the forerunner to Caucasian. Prior to Caucasoid, was Neanderthal and prior to Hominid. Humans do not extend from Hominid. We do not fully understand where or how they came into existence on this planet. Hominid, was part Human and part Primate. A now extinct Primate whose descendants we see in the Baboon, Chimpanzee, Orangutan, etc., and the Rhesus Monkey. This is where your RH Factor comes from and it is WHY we are able to know that upstream to Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Caucasian) existed a biological entity that must have been part Primate and part Human. We can logically deduce that quite easily. This tells you that Human predates the Hominid and it explains why there are no legitimate fossil records prior to 47,000 years ago for the developmental branching of your oldest Ancestors.

This means that your oldest Ancestors are approximately 47,000 years old. The problem is this: Humans and Primates cannot procreate together. That's worth repeating loud and clear: Humans and Primates do not share the same number of chromosomes and cannot procreate together. They cannot produce offspring. They could not have produced the first Prototype Hominid. That leaves only two (2) possibilities for the existence of your oldest Ancestor:

Possibility Number #1: My Ancestors created the first Hominid
Possibility Number #2: A fourth Species who left no trace of itself on this planet created the first Hominid.

Hominid, cannot instantiate itself. Something or someone had to bring it into existence through intent and knowledge of both Animal Biology and Human Biology, sufficient to solve the problem of chromosomal incompatibility that prevents procreation between the two Species.

Now, that was your primer on your re-education. I'm not going to do your homework for you. I've studied this for years. I know what the University of Montreal and the French Geneticists produced. I've read all of their available original work. I know the Cover Story that was later released by many Western Academics proclaiming that "Early Humans Slept With Neanderthal." I know how desperate they were to undo the damage caused by the original work coming out of the University of Montreal. And, I know about the total Media blackout on what should have been the most important discovery in the History of Humanity on this planet.

The discovery that there are in fact two (2) similar Species on this planet, should have dropped every single jaw in the world until an answer was found as to how that could have possibly happened. Evolution and Darwinism have been the spring of false hope in a pathological attempt to alter history and produce a world where People, don't know the truth about themselves. Mine is not to harm. Mine is to understand where we come from, how we got here and what on earth are we doing here. Someone or something decided to alter the history of this world many thousands of years ago and was successful in doing so. The Paradigm my Ancestors knew and created is nothing like the Paradigm you or I, were born into.

When you go to sleep tonight, remember that who you are is far less important than what you are. We don't have answers for how Hominid got here. He did not evolve as the science fiction writers told us. That would be impossible because it does not explain the absence of Animal DNA in Original Sub-Saharan Humans and the absence of RH+ blood. So, "evolution" was not part of the Human experience on this planet. However, it is quite possible that a form of "evolution" took place within the Animal Human Hybrid Species, but not natural evolution. The line between Hominid and Caucasian is too direct, too straight and to non-linear. We do not see anywhere near the degree and complexity of biological (RNA/DNA variation) branching that would have been an absolutely necessity for natural evolution to have been the answer. So, we were lied to about what "evolution" means and how it was supposed to work. Most people don't understand how RNA controls DNA:


Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/316774a0

The ongoing lie here is that in the entire history of this branch of science there has never been an experiment that has shown an external environmental input controlling an internal biological function and providing the guiding influence to how the "discrimination" process between distinctive DNA sequence elements results in "evolution" with long-term exposure. Western Academics have taken great liberties with intellectual honesty when presenting this kind of information to the layperson in public. It is a massive leap of logic, faith, even to the point of being utterly ridiculous to conclude what this Abstract purports to be truth. This would be like an environmental input over time on the X-axis having not only the ability to transform DNA, but to literally guide the transformation process to the production of a new type of cell. That's is simply an absurd notion and has never been observed in this field of science. If it had been, I would have read about it. It never happened.

"Selectivity and Accuracy?" Not even close to the truth. Place a jar of jelly next to any of the 50 radioactive isotopes found in nature and over the next 1 billion years that relationship will not produce a Fully Sentient, Fully Corporeal, Bipedal and Upright Species - let alone two (2) of them. Houston, we've got a problem. We don't know how Animal Human Hybrid or Human came into existence in this world. But, we now know they both took different paths to get here and THAT is my quest - to find out how and why.

So, when you babble about being superior, when you delude yourself into thinking you are special, please understand that you are the closest thing to a Carbon Copy imaginable in this world. Pride yourself on that? Sure, go ahead. Knock yourself out. I'm about finding Truth. What are you about?

 

So why didn't you post a pic of a good looking Norwegian?

 

You don't understand the world you live in. You cannot fathom the real world. You have not done the homework and I can tell that from beyond visual range. You are not interested in Truth. You are and have been all your life, programmed by a paradigm you don't even know exists. You call it "White" male privilege. I only use the term "White" or "Black" because explaining to you the truth that has been pulled over your eyes takes too long in a single post. Of course, I just did that in my last post - but it takes a lot of foundation to be laid before you can fully appreciate what's been put before you.

Look, you have a tremendous amount of work to do in order to get caught up. You lack a fundamental understanding of World History and that causes you to run yourself off the rails. Listen, there is no such thing as "Racism." Again, I only use these terms initially because reaching you with he Truth is not possible until you take the time to study it. So, I use the Socially Engineered and socially acceptable lingua franca that you put forth, because speaking in real terms would not be something you would understand in your present intellectual condition.

There is no "Racism" because there is no "Race." You've been encoded with such programming and you take it for granted, but you have not thought it through to its logical conclusion. There are only Species within a certain Genus. You operate from the Social. I am speaking from the Scientific. Those two worlds are often at odds. We are speaking two different languages and yours is not extensible enough to handle the truth about your Species. When you "feel" racism, you are literally experiencing a genetic predisposition inherited through your Animal Genetics that is biased towards a different Species. Humans are not so genetically inclined towards other Species. One of the most territorial Species on the planet is the Primate. Thus, there is little misunderstanding as to why Imperialism and Colonialism was so common in previous centuries. Animal Human Hybrids have a more territorial nature by genetic composition. Thus, they seek to Conquer and Vanquish all. The "all or nothing" mentality is driven by this Animal tendency in Animal Human Hybrids.

The need to "feel" superior can also be explained in the genetic profile of the Animal Human Hybrid - especially within the Males. Again, it is the remnant of Primate DNA that causes this collision within Human DNA to be made manifest as the socially engineered term, "Racism." You are not a Racist. You suffer from Species Bias. There is a difference and there is causation for this differential. Again, I am not saying this to hurt you. I'm saying this to educate you. That Species Bias has been in effect for over 2,538 years and to keep the Species "Dominant," it developed a White Supremacy Paradigm where all things Human were devalued and all things Animal Human Hybrid were elevated in society - Worldwide.

To show you how, when and where this transpired in World History, I would have to take you deep into a placed called Ancient Kemet and open your eyes to their World Paradigm, which is the basis for that which you now call "Civilization" today.

There's an old saying, when the Student is ready the Teacher will appear.

 

You are missing Causation and speaking directly to Net Effect. There is so much you don't understand. But, that's a fact with most in this world. There are many "Black" People, who have no idea who or what they are in this world. We are ALL suffering the same plight - just from different angles. All I can tell you is that nothing in this world is as it seems. You either have it within you to want to know the Truth about what you are and why that matters in this world or you do not. If you do not, then you will never see this current Paradigm for what it is.

There is a lot we don't know. What's abundantly clear, is that there was a global attempt to extinguish Humans from the face of this earth. Consider it a genetics experiment on a global scale. We don't fully understand who or why. But, we do know that there are now two (2) Species on this plant sharing the same Genus, but having different genetic origins. I know you've always been taught that there is only one Human Species. If that were so, then one would not have Neanderthal DNA, while the other (Original Human) does not.

Two (2) different Species. We need to be about the business of finding out how and why. Who did that. We have much bigger fish to fry than "racism," "victim mentality" and false "superiority" complexes. Something dramatic crashed into this planet some time ago and changed everything, by introducing a new Species that mimics Humans to the Nth degree. Who did that and why.

 

Norwegian? You still there? Seems pretty quiet in here suddenly.

I'd like to talk about how and why all of your Ancestors obtained Neanderthal DNA, while none of my Original Ancestors (Original Sub-Saharan) had that genetic trait. Can you help me understand how that could possibly have happened?

I'm Human, Norwegian. Human. What's going on? How did that Ancient World filled with nothing but Humans for hundreds of thousands of years get changed into a world going through the impossible biological transformations that bring about the equally impossible evolutionary results being purported today as "science?" Who would have a need to father such lies, spending centuries perpetuating such lies and maintaining such lies? Makes the whole "welfare" question pale in comparison, no? Seems rather pointless to be discussing "welfare" at this point - does it not?

No, my dear friend - we have much bigger fish to fry here. We need to find out exactly how Hominid got here. We have not been told the truth about Hominid's existence in this world. You extend from Hominid. You should want to know his History - everything about him is important to everything taking place in this world right now. So, this is a key central figure in History, that we need to uncover, unmask and identify his source and origin.

The Etymological Roots of Hominid. So, much more enthralling a discussion than "White Supremacy Theory," no?

 

So much for "Superiority."

 

You must not be from the US

 

Oh my. I think that’s a wonderful idea.

Would you like to compare the accomplishments and contributions that your “humans” have provided to civilization as opposed to us descendants of Neanderthal?

I’m going to bet you don’t. I’m all for a discussion on the merits and accomplishments of each group.

But when you’re forced to admit those with Neanderthal genes have contributed exponentially more than those who dont have them ... that even though they be an extreme minority in this world, they have dominated the globe in every sector, by every measure and dominated their competition... remember you started this line of questioning.

Then we can really get into a discussion on superiority.

 

Thank you for this.

I have been trying to make the point that the US is now and has always been a White Supremacist Nation and there is nothing un-American about being a White Supremacist.

I don't see how you can consider it pathological, though. The nation has become rich and powerful.

 

Well... I thought one would have to seek out Stormfront and their ilk to read dissertations on the "Master Race", I wuz wrong!

 

Rather ironic that an oppressed person is piloting a multi-million dollar aircraft.. and BTW congratulations on that achievement , it is rare for anyone BUT an American! PE you are obviously highly intelligent, but not as much as you think, you appear to lack if not wisdom, then humility, you might have a little talk with your pastor about it.

 

Wait, you said you were going to stop responding to this thread!

 

Not all white people owned slaves. This is especially true in the North. John Adams, one of our Founding Fathers, first Vice President, and second President of the United States, is one example. Adams did not own slaves and was an abolitionist, as were many northern whites who did not benefit from, and actually opposed, the system of slavery.

Moreover, not all southern whites owned slaves. In fact, being a slaveholder was a hallmark of wealth, as ownig a slave was money-consuming. You had to purchase the slaves (they were not just giving slaves out for free to all white people, contrary to what you may believe), then you had to feed, clothe, and shelter them. All of this cost money, which was not financially pragmatic for all whites. Also, I'm sure slavery was also morally repulsive to the ones who could afford it in the South but did not elect to benefit from said institution.

I want to go back to when you said that affirmative action benefits white people. When I asked you how it benefits white people, you mentioned slavery, which benefited some white people in antebellum America who are all long dead. Affirmative action today does not benefit white men; it functions as a detriment to them. But slavery, since you mentioned it, did actually benefit some black people.

How!?

Well, there were actually free black people in America who owned slaves. In fact, according to The Root, in 1830, 13.7% of the American black population was free; that means there were 319,599 black freemen. Out of this population, in 1830, there were 3,776 black slaveholders who owned 12,907 slaves. Unlike affirmative action, slavery could benefit black people if they had enough wealth to own a slave. Also, black slaveholders could have white male indentured servants work there land in, yes, antebellum America! https://www.theroot.com/did-black-people-own-slaves-1790895436

So this whole, no pun intended, black-and-white narrative of yours that slavery was at the benefit for all whites and at the detriment of all blacks is simpleminded, unnuanced hogwash. It does not correspond with the cold-hard facts, the inconvenient truths, as you might say.

Over and over, Hollywood keeps making films about evil white slaveholders in the South. Why don't they ever make one about evil black slaveholders in the South as well? I mean, why not? The fact that Hollywood does not make movies about evil black slaveholders is more evidence against the absurd concept of so-called white privilege and more evidence for black privilege.

Lastly, affirmative action and slavery are similar in that they use identity politics for the benefit of some at the detriment of others. And which party is the party of both affirmative action, slavery, and Jim Crow, for that matter?

. . .

The Democrat Party, in case you were stumped.

 

In regards to slavery and Jim Crow you're referring to when the members of the Dem party were conservatives. Specifically southern conservatives.

 

Again, these arguments of absolutes are sophomoric sophistry.

"I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."

— Robert C. Byrd, in a letter to Sen. Theodore Bilbo (D-MS), 1944​

Furthermore, the Democrats Party bulwark for slavery and Jim Crow were not conservatives, as conservatism is for small government, which is anathema to the concept of such institutions.