Who are the "scientific community"?

Discussion in 'Science' started by it's just me, Nov 20, 2015.

  1. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're proving my point tho... These morons will reject ideas based on premise not evidence and will reject evidence based on premise when it's convenient to their theories.

    They aren't dumb people, they're morons, they're like children that want to be accepted by their peers instead of accepting evidence and letting it take them to the truth...

    These clowns are more interested on patting one another on the back while they feel superior being part of the "gang" than they are actually practicing science...

    They're not interested in results that contradict their theories...

    We can only make scientific progress by being wrong, and these wine drinking bearded Marxists have ZERO intention on accepting the notion they are wrong..
     
  2. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Windigo

    Windigo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    15,026
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wouldn't even put him in the realm of good physicist. When was the last time he published a major discovery? He hasn't published anything major since his 74 and 75 papers on black hole radiation which was stolen.
     
  4. DarkDaimon

    DarkDaimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    1,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So which morons are you talking about here, the scientific community?
     
  5. Blinda Vaganto

    Blinda Vaganto Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    270
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male

    It depends on the science, but mostly they are respected bureaucrats who produce tons of papers that nobody reads afterwards. Probably this is less true for biology and chemistry but very much true for economics and other social sciences.
     
  6. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, intellectuals that do nothing - that's who I'm talking about...

    There are plenty of fine scientists that don't even adhere to the intellectual snooty dogma - they want to do science not be bound by intellectual nonsense.

    Science is about evidence but intellectuals will reject any evidence that contradicts their snooty elitist gangs consensus... They have no interest in the truth or finding the truth - they're interested in being elitist intellectuals...

    These people are clowns..... It would be like getting a degree in plumbing but never working a day in their lives as a plumber but teaching plumbing and acting like they know more than a journeyman plumber that worked in the field for 20 years...
     
  7. DarkDaimon

    DarkDaimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    1,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just to be clear, are you against intelligent people or just intelligent people who disagree with you?
     
  8. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hawking doesn't say that in the article from the link you posted.
    Where is your "evidence" that he has?
     
  9. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He has said it numerous times...

    I have seen him say it in documentaries..

    [video=youtube;CjiRb1sy0sQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjiRb1sy0sQ[/video]
     
  10. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If so it would also appear in print.
    Where is your evidence?
     
  11. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I just posted a youtube video where he says/implies "aliens would be like the Spanish conquering the Americas"...
     
  12. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That contradicts what you said about Hawking and aliens in post # 91
     
  13. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No it doesn't...

    I will be straight up blunt now - Hawkings claims aliens would attack us if they existed (existed in his (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up mind)...

    That is such (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up logic I don't even know where to begin with it...

    This fool assumes aliens don't exist because they haven't attacked us...

    Using that stupid (*)(*)(*)(*) I don't exist because I don't attack people...
     
  14. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    post # 91
    You said;
    “Hawking claims that if aliens existed they would have already destroyed us, hence since we're not destroyed then aliens don't exist - yeah, some logic there.”

    You still haven’t posted anything here to substantiate your claim of him having said that.
    Where is your evidence?
     
  15. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Except for a video of him saying that...
     
  16. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have no intention of chasing something down on youtube.
    Anything he's had to say about aliens in a documentary would also appear in print;
    why can't you provide a link to a source for what you claim he said?
     
  17. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The 'Scientific Community' is whoever you want it to be in order to support your pseudo-scientific theories.
     
  18. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dude you don't have to chase anything down on youtube I posted the video to the forum - all you have to do is hit play and it will start playing right here in the forum..

    The funniest part about your defiance is that Hawking has said it time and time again..
     
  19. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have no intention of wasting my time trying to the find the video in this forum either.
    To reiterate;anything he's had to say about aliens in a documentary would also appear in print;
    why can't you provide a link to a source for what you claim he said in writing?
    If I don't see a link for it in your next post we are done here.
     
  20. Windigo

    Windigo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    15,026
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then zip it.
     
  21. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're on the ignore list sport.
     
  22. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In post # 91 you said;
    “Hawking claims that if aliens existed they would have already destroyed us, hence since we're not destroyed then aliens don't exist - yeah, some logic there.”

    You misrepresent what he actually does say on the subject.
    He makes no reference to past tense nor does he discount the existence of aliens.

    Stephen Hawking - Encountering Intelligent Life
    Stephen Hawking discusses what could happen if we are visited by intelligent alien life.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjiRb1sy0sQ

    Stephen Hawking in an exclusive interview for El Pais
    25 SEP 2015 - 05:57 EDT
    Q. You recently launched a very ambitious initiative to search for intelligent life in our galaxy. A few years ago, though, you said it would be better not to contact extraterrestrial civilizations because they could even exterminate us. Have you changed your mind?
    A. If aliens visit us, the outcome could be much like when Columbus landed in America, which didn’t turn out well for the Native Americans. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they can reach. To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational. The real challenge is to work out what aliens might actually be like.

    http://elpais.com/elpais/2015/09/25/inenglish/1443171082_956639.html
     
  23. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You basically are confirming what I'm saying and furthermore proving how stupid Hawking actually is..

    He says aliens would invade us, then wants to search for them...

    Yea, pay attention to what he said...

    The guy thinks if aliens exist they would kill us, hence he has stated in the past since we're NOT dead that they don't exist...

    I saw him say it in a documentary a few months ago and was baffled by his logic...
     
  24. MrNick

    MrNick Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,234
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are two different types of genius, those that imagine then see if the numbers fit their imagined ideas, and those that look at the equation and then base their ideas off their theorem. Einstein is the former and Hawking is the latter. Those of the latter are terrible philosophers because they have number minds.
     
  25. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm confirming no such thing..
    Spin it anyway you like;that's not what he said..
     

Share This Page