Will Republicans Elect A Pedophile?

I don't disagree, I was just pointing out a double standard WRT many postings I've read about Harvey Milk (post mortem) and an alleged 16 y.o.

 

Fake news, typical smear campaign by desperate Democratic Party hacks, meant to counter many of their own famous supporters in Hollywood crashing and burning. Democrats and their media no longer have to worry about credibility any more, having lost all of that and then some in last year's elections, so this is the kind of stuff they're left with as 'talking points'; they're vermin, and they know they're vermin, and they know we know they're vermin, and we know they know we know they're vermin.

 

lol yes, it's hilarious how they cite that sleazy tabloid as some kind of 'serious source' for anything. But they only want to fire up their own base, so they don't have to worry about credibility anyway. Their base is merely assorted deviants and sociopaths, so no need to worry about stuff like facts.

 

Nothing has been proven but mcconnell and mccain are using this lie to pressure moore to drop out

The woman is a 3-time loser and probably a democrat

 

Would you support a known pedophile for public office?

 

So much for your conservative values then.

 

meh

 

Did he? How do you know?

 

So, he's guilty? He's a pedophile?

 

You were excusing this creep by trying to use a false equivalency (someone did something like this somewhere, sometime, so this is OK). You're excusing pedophilia.

Proud?

 

Is there documentation of this? Or is the documentation recent?

Seriously, if there's a letter one of them wrote to a friend at the time, that does change things a bit.

 

Yes, they will.

He's like Joseph the carpenter, you know. Because Mary was a teenager, and all that.

Besides, better a lunatic, out of control, perverted creep like Moore than a *gasp* Democrat.

 

It's isn't 2007. It's 2017. 1979 was almost 39 years ago, not 29.

 

Attack the accuser. Good tactic!

Of course you defended Hillary Clinton when she attacked her husband's accusers, right? I mean, if you didn't, that would make you a hypocrite.

 

Has he been convicted yet, if not you just apparently libeled him.

 

Weiner was only convicted recently...but was forced out of Congress over a year ago...

 

Nope it isn't the first time the establishment dredge up a bunch of slime and tried to paint someone they didn't like with it.

 

Are you defending Weiner????

 

Actually no. Don't think most of us excused Clinton. We just thought that those were not grounds for impeachment. And there is a difference between voting for a Trump and impeaching after the election.

 

Yeah right.Like what took this little Miss Moffett 38 years
to come forward.And now of all times.
Just in time to create a New News cycle and take Hillary right
off the front page.While coincidentally making Roy Moore the new
left's New Boogeyman.
If this wasn't so blatantly Obvious it would seem Hellish.

 

Thinking and acting are two entirely separate issues. We don't have thought police yet but we do have laws governing actions that are designed to protect minors.

 

Yes there is a statute of limitations for pedophilia. Or in this case pederasty. And tell where these ladies were when it happened? Or when he was first nominated for judge or other political office.

 

Talking about just allegations of rape against Clinton here, like allegations against Moore, not the proven sex in the Oval Office.

 

nope Moore

 

They already voted for a ***** grabbing serial adulterer and wife-beater.