Women want right to go topless in public, take case to state's Supreme Court

you go girls; make it common under the common law!

 

Oh no....my husband has been faking it! And the millions of others lol
By the way I can show articles debunking this.

 

Faking what? Orgasms? At no point is it being claimed that all sensitivity is being lost. But this is not new for you. You make a claim that a given fact is or is not, and then when proved wrong shift the goal posts. Fact remains. The foreskin has nerve endings that are lost due to circumcision, and that the procedure has no medical necessity, at least not upon an infant.

 

Don't fake it chics; insist, Practice makes Perfect. All guys fall for that.

 

You make it all so Gross.
Yuck.

 

Can you name the nerve endings of the foreskin ?
Show them on a chart ?

 

A maavelous idea. As long as they are prepared to be gawked at.

 

When I was 9, I saw a Young Woman feeding her Baby, I did not gawk, and it seemed perfectly natural.

 

lol. that is soo, silly.

 

Yes it is natural and not an attention getter, but walking down the street..........

 

Can you show them ending on a chart before they get to the foreskin?

You're not mistaking me for squidward from the other thread, who keeps asking people to show neural pathways, are you?

 

Actually there are many studies showing there is no difference,,..

One of the funniest lines I heard from a female comedian was, “men are so dumb that when you tell them that they are best sex they actually believe it’

 

I’m going to open a clinic for foreskin transplants

 

You still haven't address what medical necessity is present to make this a procedure to be done on children. At this point no one is arguing that it shouldn't be allowed to consenting adults.

 

i prefer full body massage with happy ending.

 

That will cost extra!

 

There are many health reason..look, I don’t care either way.

 

I will take that into account, when I establish a petty cash fund for this purpose.

 

If you don't care then why even make the argument that you cannot back up?

 

If you google you’ll find both pro and con. As I said, I don’t care either way. I have yet to meet a man who wishes he had his foreskin.

 

So we should just go ahead and take the appendixes out of babies, since no one will ever claim to miss their appendix, eh?

 

I refuse to complain if women decide to go topless!

 

The appendix was redefined as an organ with a specific important function.

Link:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...once-have-a-purpose-that-has-since-been-lost/

Scientific American
HEALTH

What is the function of the human appendix? Did it once have a purpose that has since been lost?

Loren G. Martin, professor of physiology at Oklahoma State University, replies:

"For years, the appendix was credited with very little physiological function. We now know, however, that the appendix serves an important role in the fetus and in young adults. Endocrine cells appear in the appendix of the human fetus at around the 11th week of development. These endocrine cells of the fetal appendix have been shown to produce various biogenic amines and peptide hormones, compounds that assist with various biological control (homeostatic) mechanisms. There had been little prior evidence of this or any other role of the appendix in animal research, because the appendix does not exist in domestic mammals."

Added note:
* Immune system functions.*

 

Has anyone ever complained about missing their appendix, as per Renee's argument?

 

When they start taking out appendixes which is major surgery, we can discuss that..right now it’s a strawman