WOODWARD FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION, EVEN THOUGH HE ‘LOOKED FOR IT HARD’

I wasn't quoting you, specifically, Spooky....I've seen it posted several times throughout the threads about him.

 

Fair enough

 

HAHAHAHAHA, touche', of course he is not and he is also not Mueller !

 

Well that's obviously bunk. TEN of Trump's friends, confidantes, and trusted professionals have flipped to testify on all they know about Trump. The latest is Manafort. Your assertions are obviously false.

 

"Degenerate " Watergate reporter? Is that likeva degenerate POTUS thatvwe now have?

 

Woodward is a loyal leftist and what he found was a Right of Center president; and so like a loyal party tool he pumped out a book full of propaganda.

 

How long are we supposed to keep waiting?

 

That's up to Mueller, exposing a Manchurian Candidate can be quite timely and difficult as you are also dealing with years of leverage and a worthy foreign adversary capable of anything.

 

No. But your picking and choosing what he claims to support your own agenda. Either he is a reputable journalist or he is not. Which is he ?

 

You truly are brilliant.

 

I know, sometimes its a burden though.

It takes work to communicate with the less intelligent people in the world.

Its hard.

 

Except he skipped on the one thing that might really have brought down the presidency - collusion.

So it is all propaganda, but he missed the biggest target.

Right.

 

Were he to have claimed collusion in his book then both sides would have forced him to reveal all his sources and hand over his recordings; and if he were to do that then they would have discovered that not only that he COULD NOT prove collusion but also couldn't prove his many lesser assertions. His success rides on the fact that nobody has ever forced him to produce recordings on anything.

 

I saw a woman drinking a glass of neat Russian vodka last week was she colluding?



Of course not she was too pissed.

 

So an investigation with no time limit. How convenient for you and Mueller. And I suppose the American taxpayer will just have to keep forking over millions of dollars to pay for this timeless investigation?

 

Is there a law regarding "time limits" on an investigation hunting criminals?

 

To be fair to Mueller though; he is quite aware that the moment he closes the case he then no longer enjoys legal protection from being added to the list of crooked people that are being investigated by various committees; the same committees that are finding politically corrupted upper level FBI agents, who are then being chewed up and spat out by the justice system. He NEEDS to make this bogus investigation last for as long as possible. His real goal is to stay out of prison himself.

 

In fact, in an NPR interview, he offered to publish tapes if given permission. So all of these WH officials denying the words published should agree to the tapes being published to show proof they didn't say what was reported. But not a peep...

 

Key word . . . offered. One noticed that he's never actually done so. He's not going to risk it this time around either.

 

Expect a side step to something about Obama, Hillary or some form of obfuscation rabbit hole.

 

Well, one way to find out for sure. Any one of them denying their published words should DEMAND that the tapes be published. Why haven't they done that?

 

Ask them. Ask why Woodward doesn't simply go ahead and make all his resources public.

 

Journalistic integrity (go ahead...take a shot at that phrase) dictates that he can't just publish conversations without the permission of his subjects. I just don't understand why the subjects denying the conversation don't demand he publish the proof!

 

You mean that Woodword deliberately lied to the fake news media, KNOWING that without permission he couldn't actually produce proof of anything he claimed in his book? Sweet!

 

Lets go back to the deniers...why wouldn't they demand the conversations be published?