World Implications if NASA Finally Admits to Life on Mars

Nope, your 'evidence' is no more than your, and your fellow tin-foil hatters', interpretation of what you want to see.
That is not evidence.

 

LOL - Yes, very ignorant people, probably based upon religious myths and superstitions, would have to deny a whole new set of scientific facts and evidence. Of course they're already used to living in denial so does much change really?

For those of us that understand and accept science though nothing would really change. We already know that the statistical probably of life elsewhere in the universe, including intelligent life, is an extremely high probability so we wouldn't be surprised at all at such a discovery. We would be far more surprised if life isn't found elsewhere in the universe eventually.

 

How do you do video .I've looked it up but everyone uses a different method. I've tried the tool bar on this forum , but it just adds the dam commercial and not the video when I put the URL IN. Plus there's hundreds of videos . I don't see the problem with people just going to Curiosity Anomalies and Mars Anomalies and watching the evidence like I have , that is if there really concerned about evidence and not just part of the cover up.

 

Videos are not evidence, they are opinion. That's a very different thing, and as far as 'cover ups' are concerned, how do you know anything is being covered up?

 

Youtube videos? Copy your link with [ctrl+c], paste it here, and put [video] before it, [/video] after it. Alternatively, just click the film reel icon and paste it in there.

I'm not asking for every video on the subject, just provide us with your best one as a source on this page, then you're welcome to refer people to additional sources, as you've done. The important thing is that you place a direct link in your OP to support your post. That's a requirement for all threads - no matter how easy the sources are to find.

 

Here's one of your Mars Anomalies videos. Do you want to count how many times the words, "it looks like" are used?
'It looks like' is not evidence; it is a subjective interpretation. Evidence is not subjective.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug522V-GMns

 

I've watched hundreds of these videos . I am a scientist and chemist and cannot be fooled. I know what is real, plausible, or just B. S. I have an I.Q. that measures consistently in the mid 130's., so I'm not some dumbass that believes everything put in front of my face. My G.PA. in college was 3.65. and that's because statistics class kicked my ass I still have night mares about that. My best achievement was getting the overall top grade in my Microbiology class of 75 people with a 96 on the comprehensive final.

 

Everybody can be fooled, and no scientist of any worth will accept at face value what some conspiracy theorist has posted on youtube! Anyone positing that they cannot be fooled is deluding themselves.
Educational qualifications are not proof that you can't be fooled. The fact that you're accepting "it looks like", and someone's uncorroborated personal opinion as fact, shows that you have not the vaguest inkling of how science works.

 

Some people have posted videos for me and I've referred people to those posts. Like #63 ,189. and 202

 

Ok, pay attention now.

Open a window with the youtube video you want to post.
Below the video screen click 'SHARE'
Below the Facebook and Twitter icons you will see a text box with the video's url highlited in blue.
Place your cursor over the blue highlighted text then right click. Then select 'Copy'

Now return to this thread and hit 'Reply' or 'Reply With Quote' On the tool bar above the reply box you will find an icon that looks like a film strip. Click that, A window will pop up. Now paste your copied url into the box beneath the instructions 'Enter Your Video Clip url below." Then click the OK button.

You're done. Many youtube videos are preceded by an advertisement which may or may not be imported with the video.

 

Anyone in the world can download these same pictures, and I have seen as many as 10 different people doing the same pictures showing the same or different anomalies in them and coming to the same conclusions. So I know they're not manipulated because they are downloaded independently and they are the same exact photo. The fact that the person is saying looks like or could be , what does it look like to you, I'm showing you something that is questionable or doesn't look right , do your own analyses , make up your own mind
is exactly how scientific study starts.

 

Here's one I think we'll all enjoy. LOL

[video=youtube_share;qLxoEcI94G4]http://youtu.be/qLxoEcI94G4[/video]

 

[video]www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XAUumX4yBE[/video]

Tell me these aren't fossils.

[video]www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XAUumX4yBE[/video]

 

Here's another one I like


[video]www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3vWMhs2mPc[/video]

 

Pictures like this one are surely manipulated...

 

I had in mind what Walter Lippmann called the 'bewildered herd'. You can see them in action later today and tomorrow.

 

Here's more on the statue
[video]www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvOWnkJHHBI[/video]

 

Here's another good one .It's not conclusive, but everything in this picture couldn't have been done by wind and erosion.

[video]www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZU3Ye1hk9H4[/video]

 

Ok, just for shibits n giggles I went to NASA.gov (not NASA.com) and downloaded the image used in the youtube video above. NASA # PIA16453.

Now folks. Go to the 1 minute mark in Don's video and freeze frame the image on full screen. The caption says "Mars Transporters and Human Occupants" with three arrows pointing to what are purported to be transporters.

Now look at the image below. It is a blow up of the same area downloaded from NASA.gov. So....WTF!!!???Where did the transporters go?

 

What are you saying .Are you agreeing NASA is messing with the photos or are you saying my photo is manipulated because that same photo has been downloaded dozens of times by different people. There are a lot of photos originally released by NASA and later when other people have downloaded it the image has changed many many times . I haven't got time to prove this right now . Got to GO get me some TURKEY& DRESSING.

 

No he is saying that people are manipulating the NASA images then claiming NASA is manipulating them

 

That's interesting that dozens of people can manipulate the same photo the same EXACT way. AMAZING .PALEEEEZEEEEE!!!!!!!

 

I'm saying that the photo used in your video is very obviously manipulated in order to dupe gullible folks into believing that there is humanoid life on Mars. Elements claimed in the video are not present in the originals. The so called transporters have been added and display different hue and contrast from the rest of the image. Face it pard...ya been hornswaggled Looking forward to your "proof" I'll hold you to that promise. Happy Thanksgiving.

 

Dozens? Show me. I saw an image on youtube and a raw image from NASA - that's exactly two

- - - Updated - - -

People will always see what they want to see. Thats why UFOs exist

 

Why is this not in the conspiracy forum?