WTH? CDC Admits “At No Time Has CDC Guidance Suggested that Masks Were Intended to Protect the Weare

You can respond to my post if you like, or you can keep playing the fake shell game that I've already called out and pretend that it proves something while ignoring all of the research out there.

 

Obviously you can't produce the study.
Science is such a cool word to throw around, isn't it?

 

Again with the shifting sands...... The goal post just never stops moving does it? Is there any limit to what your fear will induce next?

 

Fake arguments are easy to throw around. Actually considering the research is harder. We have lab evidence showing the slowing of particulate spread, epidemiological evidence of declines in cases when mask use is more common, etc. But don't let a silly thing like facts get in the way of your politics.

 

I didn't realize basic, rational observations would trigger you. My apologies.

 

As a non medical, blue collar guy, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that to one degree or another, a mask would work both ways, breathing out and in. Coupled with sanitizer, hand washing, not touching your face after touching your surroundings when you're out and about, such as grocery shopping, and keeping a general mindfulness about it, that's about as much as the average person can do. Then there's staying healthy, with plenty of sleep, taking multi vitamins and extra vitamin C.

 

Just a service to you. Quote from a source:
"If you don't want to discuss the topic of a thread, then please do not post in it. And certainly do not post in a thread simply to tell another member that they sound triggered."

Just sayin. Now, as for how you've swam around the pond a time or two now, The goals do seem to move, a lot really. Why is it so difficult for you to say, this point, no other and stand on it?

 

I've answered your questions and my goals have not "moved," as anyone who has read can see. I encourage you to read my comments if you are going to keep asking me for answers.

 

Not according to the CDC director.

The CDC director assured us on national TV that his mask protects him more than a vaccine.

 

Goody.
Thats not incidence of disease. Sorry

Awesome, I eagerly awate your prospective, controlled study demonstrating reduced incidence of disease as the primary endpoint of the study.
Should be a piece of cake for you. You're welcome!

 

Yes, distrust people who do this for a living simply because they didn't tailor their responses and recommendations to follow along with the Trump fantasy narrative.

 

I can't imagine why you said that. I didn't, nor did even think it. My problem with the epidemiologists is that they ventured into business and economy where they didn't belong.

 

Masks are a symbol of compliance to authority.

 

What fantasy narrative?

 

Trump's narrative about the virus since it started. Dismissing it, those who have died from it, dismissing it's danger, dismissing the safety recommendations necessary to deal with it. It's all about trying to ruin him or some malicious plan to take over for some nefarious shadowy goal just like a James Bond bad guy.

 

In what way? The shutdowns? From what I've seen, it's all centered around the social aspect of those things. Epidemiologists weren't telling folks not to work from home, or not to have businesses. Just the mashing together of people involved with those things presents a great risk for spread of a highly contagious disease. Governors heeded their advice largely in the name of preventing illness and death within the populations they're responsible for. Some did better than others. Lockdowns might one day be necessary again if the rate of new infections gets too high. I hope that doesn't happen, and I think it will be harder to do in a lot of places than it was in the spring. Maybe more targeted lockdowns instead of blanket ones would be better. I think so. There's no question that the lockdowns hurt business and the economy. The alternative would have done the same. It's been doing the same since the beginning of the summer when many of the lockdowns had ended.

 

You likely already know, but that's because they have a vested interest in the outcome, and that interest IS NOT public health.

 

What is it?

 

You MAY not have the disease but that is by no means a certainty, even if you were just tested very recently. You can be reinfected with this malady at almost any time by almost any circumstance, it is that virulent and infectious

The masks by themselves and as recommended now do a VERY partial and incomplete job of hindering the spread ABSOLUTELY no more, and this WAS said by everyone FROM THE BEGINNING. Dirty Don, Typhoid Mikey and Murdering Mitch can turn and twist and tie themselves into as many knots as they please, nothing else has EVER been said.

 

Giggles.

 

~ It is mostly the government appointed ones who are unreliable .

~ "HEIL HITLER ! "

 

They are all government appointed. We don't elect epidemiologists.

 

Power and control - the bane of government.

 

Do the Epidemiologists want power and control?

And power and control over what?

 

People. Power corrupts. Remember?