Prog buffoonery. Trump I could subsidize, attach mining incentives to an employee education / training bill. But (D) would cry until a $1bn proposal swelled to $10 bn and they gut it, and grift it. The Farm Bill (corp. welfare) is stalled ... again. Actual subsidizes to farmers a tiny % of earmarked spending ... the bulk funds SNAP. Still, a single dollar not part of wealth redistribution to (D) voters, is $1 too much spending.
Awww, check you out trying to use fancy terms. A logical non sequitur is when someone draws conclusions erroneously from statements. You literally said Trump shut down a coal mine. But it's still adorable when you try.
This is a single mine that is up for sale without a buyer. I would like to see some industry-wide stats before I made the claim that coal is dying. Where I live, coal is still going strong.
You are so right!!! The rightness have been doing this since WWII, and they are as gigglesome now as then.
I get so tired of the constant denials that the coal industry as we have known it is dying. Yet another mine is closing. https://www.wymt.com/content/news/L...-mine-with-400-workers-closing-497435641.html
In my area Duke is facing massive cleanup expenses for coal ash dumps that have been leaking into water supplies. The nuclear plants are looking at the same kind of terminal waste problem, and Duke is leaning more and more on gas and solar. My son works for a gas company in Nebraska, and they are investing heavily in wind farms. The overall supply of gas is finite, yet demand is rising. Wind and solar are great, and necessary, however, I don't think there is such a thing as solution to our energy needs. Everything has it's draw backs and creates pollution somewhere along the production chain. What is the green cost for manufacturing solar panels? Windmills have relatively short life spans. In the end, one energy source moves us away from it's set of problems and we move on to another set of problems. I can't help but wonder, when the landfills fill up with cell phone batteries, how will we get through the day?
There is one reason why employment in the coal industry has been declining since 1985 and the reason is not Reagan, Bush I, Bill Clinton, Bush II, Obama, or Trump. The one overriding reason why coal employment has steadily declined since 1985 is...........drumroll ...... DEMAND. Demand ! Demand has declined. Edit add..For you Obama haters and Trump fans , guess what? Coal employment actually rose forva couple or so years during Obama. Obama does not get credit for the rise nor does he get the blame for the declining years. https://www.ft.com/content/82f9087c-9cdd-11e7-8cd4-932067fbf946
No, but I live near a fossil plant with a scrubber stack, and it is perfectly clean. The only emissions are water vapor. This is about 45 minutes from my house.
Thank you, camp steve-o. What about pre-burning procedures in terms of ground and table water, as well as ground contamination?
you justify it any way that helps you sleep friend. Coal has been a dying industry for a very long time. It employs less than 75,000 people total. Maybe you can explain WHY its a top priority for this administration ?
Why would you think I need help sleeping? Because it is symbolic, and it won him WV. He also made promises for those votes, and is carrying through with them. There are generations of tradition. Proud people doing hard, dangerous work to keep the nation lit, and the Obama administration took an absolute dump on them, and Clinton was a vocal part of that. Coal is iconic in America, and Trump was smart enough to know it.
Bummer ... Beto's Texas bloodbath has a lot of spare ca$h on hand. Maybe bribery in swing states is something the DNC needs to put MORE effort into.
That's why Trump became president, because he wasn't rich enough. He needed to completely control all his investments, so instead of ridiculously wealthy, he could be uber wealthy. How old is he again? It only makes sense the best way to control your wealth is simply become president to control all the markets and industry...because that's what presidents do=) /derp
Are you absolutely sure ? If they're using selective catalytic reduction then it significantly reduces NOx emissions but does not eliminate them completely.