Yovanovitch gets standing ovation at the end of 5-hour hearing

I read this as pure satire.

 

Please explain how the United States' national security was endangered, be precise.

 

No kidding, even if Russia is tied in here, so what? Russia has an economy the size of Italy's, a military 10% of ours, and one aircraft carrier that is currently broken and out of service.

I guess the crowd giving the ambassador a standing O didn't mind she committed perjury.

 

Maybe try equal work....

 

Cuz some dumb ****s said so

 

lol... yes... everything that does not fit your narrative is "false". But, sadly for you and the pathetic Democrats, the guy is on audio recording sharing how Yovanovitch made him take down a list and how they helped Hillary and hurt President Trump.

 

lol... she's no hero. She's a lying Obamite that was also working for Hillary Clinton's campaign. She's a scumbag that thinks her agenda is proper over the President of the United States. She needed firing and now should be arrested.

 

Ah...the phony Solomon story about the mythical lost of those not to investigate. Who told Solomon?

 

Of course individual sexists exist. But only in the Democratic Party is sexism systemic.

 

To be completely fair, I don't think exclusively it's an IQ problem. I think the problem is psychological. The people that buy this stuff have been brainwashed, and I really wonder about how we bring them back into the fold. They're aggravating, but they're also victims of psychological warfare.

 

You mean the Limbaugh and Hannity supporters? I think economics will eventually do the trick, as well as the mounting evidence against him. Will be hard to vote in the Senate impeachment trial for a person who will be shown to be so obviously guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. And, once he's out of office, he'll be prosecuted.

 

The statue of limitations will be over by 2025 when he leaves office for your selective prosecutions.

 

I'd guess that will depend on the charges and the specific times of the indicted crimes.

 

She had to lie about covering up Ukrainian corruption.
Hasn't that been a critical objective of America's foreign policy "experts"?

"In bureaucracies, power tends to concentrate in the hands of a few people at the top. These people then use their position to promote their own interests over the interests of the organization. Sociologist Robert Michels called this tendency of organizations to become increasingly dominated by small groups of people the iron law of oligarchy."

Robert Michels, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, 1915, trans. Eden and Cedar Paul (Kitchener, Ontario: Batoche Books, 2001), 241, http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/michels/polipart.pd

 

More silly whataboutism. No I did not see that, but in any event, Stefanik is a politician and thus fair game. Yovanovitch is a public servant and is absolutely constrained in capacity to defend and fire back.

 

Prove to me that Yovanovitch has been insubordinate, in an open and public way.

 

Oh, balderdash!

 

Is that you conceding that Trump was 'rude?' If so, why not call it for what it truly is. (Instead you attempt a wash off with 'big deal.) That is, undeniable private and public denigration of her, defamatory of her, and demeaning to her. (Deflecting to the Democrats does not dilute that appalling conduct by Trump.)

 

Oh! Dear Lord!! “Brainwashed” from the same people saying over and over “there is no wrongdoing” despite the golden boy ADMITTING he sought assistance from a foreign government to discredit a rival

He has admitted to doing that

 

You just keep on thinking that way. haha

 

Whatever you say.

 

No, I didn't; did you?

 

Capitalism at it's best.

 

Like I mentioned, I'm going to enjoy watching Trump get impeached in the House. Hope he doesn't have a hissy fit over it.

 

Article II. The Executive Branch
Section 1. [1] The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. Section 3. ..he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.

The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress.

As Federal Law Enforcement Officer it is the Executive's mandate to investigate unlawful acts regardless of the political implications or potential fallout. If Biden or Son are guilty then the President is 100% justified in the pursuit of justice and indemnified from claims of political motivation. Biden's past service or current position as presidential candidate is incidental.

The claim is that there is reasonable suspicion that Biden et. al. broke federal laws, if this proves true then the Executive is correctly executing the obligations required it by law.

Cheers