Zoophile Marriage Equality

I want to draw everyone's attention to a really sad story. This guy's life partner was a horse. His horse liked to sodomise him and he liked it too. It was a healthy loving relationship and if you disagree then you're prejudiced.

Anyway, one day this guy and his horse are doing their thing and the horse gets carried away and perforates this guy's bowel and colon. Because of all the discrimination against zoophiles this guy was too embarrassed to go to the hospital and ended up dying.

These sort of tragic deaths and the discrimination against zoophiles has to be stopped. I say as long as a person and an animal are in a consensual relationship they should be allowed to marry and adopt children. Don't you agree?

Horse man love story:
http://www.themanyfacesofdeath.blog...eath-by-horse-sex-kenneth-pinyan-usa.html?m=1

 

I did, indeed, see what you did there.

And let's not be coy, you want to pretend like bestiality is the same thing as homosexuality. I don't give a crap about your excuses or your mockery of gay rights.

You lost the fight against marriage equality, just get over it. You are a dwindling minority of people who will one day be just as marginalized as the people who object to interracial marriages.

You will respond with something along the lines of "Who mentioned homosexuality?! I'm just bringing up a case of a loving relationship between a man and a horse".

Don't bother. We all know what your point is, and I don't give a toss what your excuses for making that point in such a silly manner are.

 

Forget about gay marriage. I'm not talking about that. Just tell me, do you support marriage equality for zoophiles and their partners? Yay or nay?

 

Our supreme law of the land secures rights for Persons. In any case, a horse may only eat hay and need a stable as a Senator; but i digress.

 

Yeah persons have a right to marry a horse. It's all about equality dude. Don't fight equality.

 

So then why can't the guy legally get banged by his partnerhorse?

You're not advocating for discrimination are you? And if you are, on what grounds?

 

Since I think anyone should be able to adopt (not just those in relationships) - yeah, I've got no problem with a man and a horse having a child together.

That's one of the stranger things I've said this week

 

What about Hominidae rights? Would it be fair to give non-Hominidae "affirmative action" before Hominidae?

- - - Updated - - -

It isn't about equality but tolerance.

 

There's such a thing as spell check. Use it. Especially when it's your main topic. Gives you a little more credibility. You need it. Badly.

 

That's good but there's still so much more to do. We need to support rights for diaper fetishists/adult babies. Adult babies like to dress up in diapers and pretend to be a baby in mess in them. Did you know there aren't any hate crime laws exclusively for adult babies? Did you know shyster civil rights lawyers can't sue based on discrimination against adult babies? If I went to work in a diaper sucking a pacifier and messed myself I'd get fired from my job. People are so hateful.

- - - Updated - - -

No I don't need it. I didn't make any spelling mistakes. Please show me why you say I need spell check.

 

Was I mumbling? I already addressed that specific dodge.

"You will respond with something along the lines of "Who mentioned homosexuality?! I'm just bringing up a case of a loving relationship between a man and a horse".

Don't bother. We all know what your point is, and I don't give a toss what your excuses for making that point in such a silly manner are."

You're not actually fooling anyone.

You lost the fight for marriage equality, get over it.

 

I'm opposed to hate crime legislation - all of it. Same goes for restrictions on firing employees. If you want to fire someone and haven't agreed otherwise in the employment contract - go right ahead.

The anti-discrimination movement has gone too far - beyond securing the rights of individuals, and on to secure the rights of the collective at the expense of the individual.

 

What part of 'between two consenting adults' are you struggling to understand?

It's really not that difficult. Adult humans (regardless of gender) can give verbal and formal written consent. Horses can't. It's really not rocket science.

 

Oh, I get it! You're one of those hateful religious zealots. You just want to take rights away from zoophiles. Can't you see what this bigotry leads to? The guy in the OP died because of the discrimination dude!

 

Nobody can be partners with an animal. They are lower life forms and dint have the status of personhood.

This is called Paraphilia.

 

What part of "between a man and a woman" don't you understand? That's the argument the hateful bigots used to take rights off gays. Besides, zoophiles don't say "animals" we say "non-human persons."

Dude, he didn't have sex with the horse. The horse had sex with him. I think getting an erection and inserting into someone constitutes "consent." Why are you being so hateful? These people and non-human persons are in loving relationships.

I bet you're against polygamy too.

 

Sodomize is with a 'z', not an 's'. If you're going to use some inane story to make an inane point, at least get the gist of the subject right.

Do you peruse these kinds of sites to get your jollies? Seems almost as bizarre at bestiality. Perhaps a bit safer, but just about as weird.