Mob of 20 'hooded blacks' storm UK pub, drag man out, stab him to death...

It looks like Trayvonism is starting to become a worldwide epidemic. Steps need to be taken toward a final solution to the question of what to do about it.

 

I have two theories:

1) Blacks are attacking whites more than they used to; or

2) Blacks have always been attacking whites, except now the media is paying attention because of the Zimmerman/Trayvon incident.

I suspect #2 is true.

 

No, I said UK gun laws are the reason common thugs are only armed with knives. I didn't even imply anything as hackneyed as "the country from breaking apart into chaos" because I'm not a tabloid headline writer.

Not as the term is commonly used, no.

I didn't. I said that parts of Europe have violence and parts of the US have violence. I was challenging the opposite claim from Don, that Europe has bigger problems that can be solved with current US policies.

 

General attitudes towards guns of the UK population. The fact this incident isn't symbolic of a trend. The ineffectiveness of death penalties. The irrelevance of multiculturalism. The fantasy of a "progressive social revolution". The fundamental differences between mainland Europe and the UK...

Most criminals in the UK don't have access to guns. That's primarily because there are relatively few guns available in general. Making guns easily available to the general population would unavoidably make a lot more gun available to criminals too (which is the compromise the US is largely stuck with).

I didn't say anything about it being limited to blacks. I also said gangster, not ghetto.

In general, no.

Yes, in the US, with US gun culture and existing proliferation of legal and illegal guns. That doesn't mean leaping from the entirely different UK position to that the best approach here.

 

"Trayvonism" is confined to the US. It's just that the US is looking at events in the rest of the world with reference to the Martin-Zimmerman events.

 

From my perspective in criminal defense it is:

1) economic downturn
2) rise in black market (drugs, sex trafficking, slaving)
3) gangs/organized crime

Most of the violence outside of domestic cases are in those areas. The average run of the mill burglar/robber you just don't see engaging in these things as much...why I don't know. I don't think they are necessarily targeting whites, however, whites are the majority so chances are they will be on the receiving end moreso than other groups.

 

I don't think that there is any doubt that blacks are attacking whites more than they used to. As blacks become a larger percentage of the population here and in Europe (or anywhere for that matter) they become more bold. Its like anything associated with blacks.....take a high school for instance. If you have 10% black student population they will pretty much stay in line and not cause too much trouble.....but as that percentage climbs toward the 40% mark all hell breaks loose....anything over 50% and white parents are essentially commiting child abuse by sending their kids to such a school. The fact that the white population is declining in this country, coupled with the election of Obama and the general racial neutering of white America by the MSM and you have a recipe for disaster that will only get worse. Then add the Holder Unjustice Department adding fuel to the fire by essentially sending the signal that black on white crime will not be given a second thought and we get what we get.

 

Jesus Christ. If whites are the majority, then the majority of crime victims will be white. This isn't complex mathematics.

 

9 out of 10 interracial crimes between blacks and whites include a white victim and black perpetrator.

 

(Referring to the black crime in America) Needless to say, the centuries of slavery/prejudice has taken it's toll. Perhaps it's irreversible?

 

Perhaps you're right. Perhaps we never should have allowed them to come in from the cotton fields, and 600,000+ white boys wouldn't have died defending those apparently ungrateful negros' freedom.

 

Wow, what a disgusting post.

 

You did realize who you were talking with. I wouldn't expect anything else from those posters.

 

9 out of 10 people who step on an airplane in the US will be white.
9 out of 10 people struck by lightning in the US will be white.
9 out of 10 people who fall down a flight of stairs in the US will be white.

If whites are the majority then it stands to reason they will be the majority of victims of crime, white or black. I would hazard a guess that when white thieves break into houses, the houses they are breaking into probably also have white people inside. Is that racially motivated, too?

 

Just because I don't believe in your progressive religion does not make me ignorant. Your small mind betrays itself.

Gun crime is growing in the UK:

Culture of violence: Gun crime goes up by 89% in a decade

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1223193/Culture-violence-Gun-crime-goes-89-decade.html


28 gun crimes committed in UK every day

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1576406/28-gun-crimes-committed-in-UK-every-day.html

Mind you, the UK is just the size of Oregon.

Sorry, gangsta culture is ghetto culture and by far the biggest participants are blacks.


In general? So, you have them in high violent crime ghetto areas?


Look, I watched the rioting in the UK, and the violent crime rates rising. Your current methods aren't working. You'll have to take your spines out of mothballs.

_

 

You made a thinly-veiled implication that white people have it coming to them whenever they fall victim to black crime. I responded by saying that perhaps white people were better off keeping your people in chains in this country. You then responded, predictably, playing the victim card. If there is ever a race war between those people, this is exactly how your side will fight it.

 

According to you they're already fighting it with guns, knives, hammers and angry mobs. Does the victim card get taped to the machete?

 

The march from the cotton fields has been a difficult one for blacks. The history of official racial prejudice in the United States is long and, unfortunately, recent. The struggle for civil rights for blacks has been difficult. It's astounding to think that in the Second World War the US military was organised along racial lines. So you had a number of black boys and a number of white boys fighting to defend the interests of the United States, but the black boys suffered from official racial prejudice, as well as the unofficial type. And you wonder why some blacks are still grumpy? The fact is that it is reactionaries who hold racially prejudiced views and who want to go back to the "ideal" situation where blacks were kept separate from whites - and you only have to go back to the 1950s for that - and they liked it that way. The problem of course is that the humanity of blacks has to be denied for that form of officlal prejudice to exist. Unfortunately for reactionaries the genii is well out of the bottle - blacks have been recognised as humans, no way back now on that one.

 

The white slaver used to live in fear that the black slaves would revolt and murder him in his bed. It seems that fear continues. But chaining them up again is not going to ease the fear. You can do that only by yourself. Overcome your hatred and you will overcome your fear.

 

What does the math tell you when blacks who make up about 13% of the population commit about 52% of the nation's homicides?



_

 

The British and French use of black slaves in the New World was a horrible crime and mistake.

Hundreds of years later, innocent people are paying the price in race based attacks fueled by power hungry progressive rhetoric.


_

 

I want you to tell all of that to the family of the poor white kid that just got beaten and stabbed to death by the 20 hooded Trayvons. Then get back to us on their reply.

 

And, they are responsible for their current problems. Whites aren't causing their high illegitimacy rates.

_

 

We all know that white liberals won't live in the ghetto, if they have the money to stay the hell out of there.

_

 

naw...they didn't participate in KEEPING slaves...they just participating in buying and selling them:

The Atlantic slave traders, ordered by trade volume, were: the Portuguese, the British, the French, the Spanish, the Dutch, and the Americans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade