You haven't heard of slander and libel? But once again it is shown the only defense the Brown side has is to act in their vile manner and declare others racist.
They don't seem to grasp the concept that any cross examination of the witnesses would have been done by WILSON's ATTORNEYS, that is what is not allowed. They are declaring that since the Brown family attorney's didn't get to cross the witnesses then they were all lying. Well the family attorneys are no part of a grand jury in ANY grand jury nor would they be part of the prosecution team in a trail if it ever got there, the very same attorney's who handled the grand jury would have handled to prosecution and any cross would have been coming from WILSON's ATTORNEYS. The fallacious nonsense the Brown defenders engage in is only matched by the Trayvon Martin defenders.
Yep. If he manages his money well he will be able to craft a career out of it. - - - Updated - - - It is not unusual in less than high profile shootings for officers to leave the force after shooting someone.
It is evidence it did, no single piece of evidence proves something is such an incident, it is the totality of the evidence. So what evidence do you have that proves otherwise? Sorry you don't get to assign your own racist meanings to words. The rest of us use the common and official definitions. thug (θʌɡ n 1. a tough and violent man, esp a criminal
and thats sad.... The state shouldnt force them to quit. Its almost impossible to fire a government worker.
It isn't always the state forcing them to quit. Shooting someone in the line of duty can have the same sort of psychological effects on a person as shooting someone in combat.
Wait a minute you chastize others saying they cannot read Brown's mind yet you profess to be able to read Wilson's mind. Care to reconcile that for us? People who panic run away, people who panic do not follow their training and carry out their duty in the face of adversity. Neither the case here. Your assertion has no basis.
Can you please cite me the evidence that the Ferguson police force did not interact with the community? What is the basis of your assertion? Wilson was interacting with the community when he first told to guys to get out of the middle of the street where they were blocking the traffic of that community and then when he was trying to apprehend a violent criminal who had just robbed a store in the community and a member of that community had called the police about it.
What the liberals see: thug (θʌɡ n-word 1. a tough black and violent black man, esp a black criminal "code words".... what a joke. Liberals: making the things people say, "racist"... no matter how much effort it takes.
You know, I suspect he has a job offer from Fox News and CNN to be a police expert. So he doesn't actually need a severance package.
The problem that is going on is thugs. That is it. In this case a Police officer was targeted because he was White. I find that disgusting. If you don't attack a police officer your chances of getting shot by one are near zero. If you punch one in his face and try to grab his gun, your mother will be printing t-shirts with your face on them by the end of the month. Obama and the leftists media have concocted this as a race crime when it wasn't. It was a straight up crime committed by a thug and I am sick of seeing hands up don't shoot, when that in fact was a make believe story that dumb people believe is true because it is repeated over and over in the media. Congrats lefties, you railroaded an innocent Police Officer for doing his job correctly as well as set back race relations in this country 50 years. More people than ever are now carrying guns to protect themselves against these thugs. If Obama really wanted to fix this situation he should be addressing why this sorry ass dead thug was committing crimes and violently attacking a police officer, not acting like the police need to interact better. In this case do YOU believe this officer shot him because he was black? Or do you think he shot him because the thug was attacking him and he felt his life in danger?
EXACTLY. Has Obama once blamed the thug for this mess? It has been proven the officer did nothing wrong so why are we focusing on why the police need to change as opposed to these caveman thugs who cant even muster the intelligence to figure out how a belt works? Black kids beat a guy to death with a hammer, its not even on the news, white officer shoots a guy in warranted self defense and Obama lets them burn a town down. I honestly cannot believe that a President is this bad. He far exceeds even my worst expectations of what a failure is. He is off all of my fail charts. Shame on you leftists out there for supporting blatant racism when you know the whole situation has been concocted by the MSM. Shame on you. Do you think thugs will beat you and your family less with a hammer because youre a democrat? The answer is No for the slower people out there.
Officer Wilson is probably glad to not have been killed the violent criminal Mike Brown. Now with the morons destroying Ferguson he and anyone else who lives there would be glad to leave that place. "Pants up, don't poop!"
What's the deal with the sagging pants thing anyway? Fads come and go, but this one has persisted for quite a while now. I read somewhere that it stared in prison as a means of advertising that you were available to be someone's b***h. Is that accurate?
when you get the chance to legally shoot some pos, you SHOULD shoot him as many times as possible, before he can fall down, and you may well HAVE to shoot him a dozen times, just to stop his attack. Most cop type handguns use pretty feeble ammo, folks. Humans are large, very dangerous animals. Guns intended for stopping 150 lb leopards are 10x as powerful as the gun Wilson used to shoot this particular pos. I recommend that we stop say 'thug" and just say "pos". that's a better description, anyway. yes, the showing of your butt, in prison, is to advertise that you're a male whore.
Michael "Gentle Giant" Brown wasn't murdered, he was lawfully killed while assaulting a police officer after committing a robbery. And his resignation is completely relevant as he did so because other feral thugs were threatening the lives of other officers. I see you have no problem with that here yet I recall a thread you started a while back about death threats and your strong position on them. So either you have weak convictions, or you're in favor of revenge killings upon innocent people so long as it aligns with the liberal con. Care to clear that up for me?
AND, he has more money today than he ever had before! Apparently, he got about $500.000 in donations, and another $500,000 for an exclusive interview with a major TV Channel!
Sigh. Anyone can sooooooooo easily discover the universal aspects of LEO training and one of which is that once you begin squeezing the trigger you continue until the threat has been neutralized, and if the assailant is still coming at you then the threat has not yet been neutralized. This is not rocket science. This is incredibly easy to research. So why the stubborn refusal to accept this known fact? What could possibly be gained by continuing to insist that 'up' must in fact be 'down' or that 'in' is really 'out'?