US and Australia history not so different

Arabs are Semitic. Europeans are Caucasian . Arabs are from middle east not caucus mountains that's Europeans. The only white you are thinking of that are white are slaves brought over from Europe and they're a minority. I lived in north Africa, you've never met a north African in your life I guarantee

- - - Updated - - -

Ok
wrong
To teach

 

Good

Nope

You need to be educated first.

 

Are you denying Arabs are Caucasian? Semitic is not a race but group of ethnicities.

There are three classes (possibly four, if you include Austrasloid) of humans as defined by race. Caucasian, Mongoloid and Negroid. Which class do Arabs fall into?

You are attempting to define humans by skin colour alone. Which is really stupid.

 

yes
no

- - - Updated - - -

Arabs are not a race, they are a cultural group. glad to help you.

 

How old are you?

Now that really is monumentally ridiculous.
Oh well its nice to J0NAH(Yes, you) is up to his old absurdities.

 

Where did I say Arabs are a race? I said Semitics (as defined by the Semitic group of languages which Arabs belong to) are a group of ethnicities.

Now, which class of humans do Arabs belong to? Choice of three, Caucasian, Negroid or Mongoloid.

 

He is an idiot, the crowd were booing the indigenious player because he just scored a goal and taunted the opposing team's fans. It had nothing to do with race. Players do not taunt fans normally, because that is exactly the reaction any and all players would get. Players of all types are yelled at etc by opposing team fans.

This whole thing is an 'invention' to use a lie about racism to promote someones agenda, first the football player himself, and now this stupid journo. They should be ashamed, and so should anyone perpetuating the lie.

 

when ever I hear someone bring up the horrible evil things white people did to indigenous people... I bring up something that makes people uncomfortable, and they never seem to have an answer... how many indigenous people, did those indigenous people kill when they took that land from them, that they claim has been taken now? how many natives slaughtered entire tribes of natives to take their land and resources, that was taken from them... its a well documented and known fact of the brutal and vicious wars among tribes in america, entire generations of some wiped out for actions of a single tribe member... blood filling the rivers for revenge and pride...

yet nobody ever focuses on all those people slaughtered by the ancestors of the very tribes today claiming they have been wronged... who will they apologize to?

so why should I feel guilty for things I never did, should they feel guilty for the things they never did... ancestors did it, not us... I can't undo what someone else did to them, and they can't undo what their ancestors did to those they slaughtered for land... so how will giving back land, or giving more free stuff to one, solve the brutality of their ancestors, who will they give that land to for their ancestry? nobody ever wants to bring this critical and important thing up, because it would mean they are just as bad...

white people killed far less natives, than natives killed natives in the entire history of indigenous people long long before europeans came over... but yet we only shame the white ones who came last... not the natives who exist today as a result of their own ancestors slaughtering of natives... ironic...

 

all of them.

 

and like the natives before, the whites will be slaughtered in future and we will all say "whites slaughtered every other race of people, why should we sympathize with whites" and we will all live happily that day yes?

 

odds are it will be global nuclear warfare... nobody will be left to write that history book... just aliens demonstrating how uncivilized humans were...

P.S. history has plenty of events where "whites" were slaughtered and wiped out... sometimes by other whites, sometimes by others... but its happened to them already too...

 

Nah, whites ain't experienced nothin you only seen one side of the story you ain't never fell to the bottom but when it happens we will all say "no sympathy" right ? RIGHT?

 

how can you say whites haven't been at the bottom? there are entire nations that were the bottom... ireland for one was the bottom, thats where they got plenty of slaves from before they used african slaves... entire nations of poverty stricken people... no european countries today, are the original european countries of the past... the lines have all been redrawn and they've all been conquered again and again and again and again... or let me guess, its just not recent enough for you? you want them to suffer today?

who's the real racist and one with a problem now... it would seem you are the one who wants to define and force suffering of a particular ethnicity... but hey I guess why let history get in the way of your hate and rage today right, I mean you just need to rationalize and justify your anger to validate it to be worthy of action... no different than any historical society or leader today, they all use exactly what you're doing right now to justify their actions and hate... selective history... why let all of it get in the way...

P.S. there is a difference for showing sympathy to the blight of people today, versus using historical acts to justify harming someone today or demanding they pay for things they did not do... you can only hold individuals accountable for their actions, unless you want to regress law to those of the family tree, in which case, we'd all be guilty for crimes our ancestors committed... so whats the final answer? move forward, or dwell in the past to punish others for acts they did not commit?

 

You have any proof?

 

the bible states you pay for fathers sins 7 generations back. You must be a pagan. That justifies your belief that enslaving black ppl was just and So you live by immoral code that allows you to do anything and seem it legal how ever horrific, like bombing Iraqi children, your law states it is not a crime, no punishment but in 100 yeArs time you will say it was a crime but it wasn't a crime back then how can we be punished, never because white tribalism permits wicked things done by white nations to non white nations, like russia blowing up 2 hospitals this week. Crime, of course not in your law but in 100 yeArs time it will be crime and shocking but how can you punish Russia 100 yeArs later DEJAVU anyone
So Ireland was at the bottom. Ireland always been at the bottom lol. You don't get it do you, here I explAin. Whites never fell from power. Simple. As. That. When you seen both sides then get at me until then whites never experience life to the fullest that's why they are less advanced race.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes. Do you?

 

The reason it was easy to "wipe out" the native populations was because there were so few of them, comparatively speaking.
The number of colonists who arrived was very overwhelming. European ways of living could sustain much larger populations within a smaller area.

 

where did I ever say slavery was good or acceptable? I have no religious affiliations... and where did we discuss bombing iraqi children? this is pure flamebait... you're making up things I never stated...

but I'm glad to see where you stand, you think whites should be punished for things their ancestors did... I sure hope you hold other skin colors to the same standard, and will you double that for "mixed" people who now must pay for the ancestors and both skin colors? see how stupid your logic is...

 

Glad yoy finally showed your colours. Blair and Bush should be in prison for life for war crimes but you think they are hero's. White tribalism right there .

Back to the point. Whites have never experienced that fall from power, yet, when it happens I hope we call all cheer euphoria like you all cheer the bombings and war in Asia and africa and their fall from power

 

My family immigrated to New York in the 1700s. They never owned any slaves and half the men in our family tree were eliminated in the Civil War, fighting for the north. My forefathers committed no such sins. But of course as a racist, you condemn all whites in America. You judge by the color of their skin.

 

He didn't say a thing about Bush or Blair. Youre just dashing for refuge in your next strawman.

 

im just quoting the bible, call Yah racist not the messenger

 

just highlighting the hypocrisy and double standards of white tribalism, the two are mutually exclusive, naturally.

 

book, chapter, and verse please.

- - - Updated - - -

God's chosen people cannot be slaughtered.

 

uuuuuh? I wasn't questioning or disputing your quote. Let me know when you come up with something relevant to the posts you choose to quote and respond to. Although it seems you try and run as far as you can from relevance.

- - - Updated - - -

You mean dashing for refuge in your next strawman

 

if mentioning american war crimes past and present in a thread about australian and american genocide in history is a strawman then hell yes, i talk about strawmen. in fact i think calling them strawmen is too complimentary, theyre not even indigenous players in the field thats why they are called colonialists.