Scant Evidence That Clinton Had Malicious Intent

She was just incompetent. We need to elect her president!

 

Lmao, that was the entire point of the FBI investigation in which they found no evidence that Hillary knew she had received classified information. Hillary's entire argument is that, that information should not be classified. Come on guys, you cannot be this far behind in the intelligence curve. They basically laid out this information on a platter for you guys.

- - - Updated - - -

My favorite thing about conservatives and this whole email fiasco is how they think all communication is done via email, lol. Like during a national crisis, people are just going to email each other.

"Hey Hillary, there is an attack going on, when you check your email, let me know what we should do!!!"

Lmfao. As if phones don't exist.

 

In other words, the idiot who does not remember if she has ever received training, did not know she was receiving classified information? Very good.

Incidentally, dick Clinton collected $12 million for his memories. Hillary got $8 million for hers. That's $20 million for memories of two people who for years have repeatedly testified, under oath, that they could not remember anything

 

The FBI investigated the issue thoroughly and found nothing. Not sure what else you need. Better luck in 2020.

 

They found plenty. Thy also found, the old bat did not remember if she was ever trained on handling classified information. As for what I need, me and at least half the country needs to see Hillary in a yellow jumpsuit.

 

They found nothing, hence why they didn't even recommend a misdemeanor charge, lol. Trust me, there's nothing you can Google on the Internet to make your opinion more credible than the FBI's after their year long investigation. Sorry you didn't get to put someone in jail for not breaking the law. Maybe if Trump wins, he'll turn us in to the North Korea you seem to admire!

 

Credible FBI? They lost their credibility. Where have you been?

Ah yes, look whom I'm talking to

 

They didn't lose any credibility. They upheld the law like they're supposed to and didn't let petty politics get in the way. I'm sorry you couldn't imprison someone because you don't like their political party. That's very Kim Jong-Un of you, lol. Better luck in 2020.

 

Did they pay federal income tax on all that money?

 

Wrong. Very wrong. The FBI investigation concluded that she did receive classified on an uncleared system, Comey stated that Hilary was "unintentionally criminally negligent". Comey let her off because he claimed they could not establish Hilary acted "with the necessary criminal intent" - which is total BS. Intent has zero to do with it.

Thats your own fantasy. You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.

 

Nope, they concluded they did not find any evidence that Hillary intended to violate any laws... therefore no reasonable prosecutor would even take the case. It was such weak evidence of a crime they didn't even recommend a misdemeanor. Sorry about your badass luck.

Of course I know what I'm talking about. I said exactly what the FBI said before they even said it. Just a normal understanding of the law. Was an easy case and it was easy to know she was not going to be convicted of any crime. Better luck in 2020. Unfortunately Trump is going to lose so you can't just go jailing your political opponents because you don't like them.

 

Very good, jack. The meaning of my post has clearly escaped you

 

I understood the meaning of your post completely. You pointed out that Bill and Hillary made millions of dollars. The only reason you know that is because every other presidential candidate for the last 30 years, they released their tax returns. In case you didn't notice, they paid millions in federal income taxes. At least they did that much.

 

As I've thought, the meaning of my post has escaped you. dick and Hillary Clinton has sold $20 millions worth of memories while remembering jack. How's this possible.. what are they Mr. And Mrs. Isaac Asimov and have sold sci if stories?

 

You should turn your findings in to a double secret super prosecutor right away. It's an open and shut case. I think you finally got her!

 

They didn't investigate the law nor even look into this intent you keep harping on. They gave everyone in every direction immunity and allowed one person of interest to become the lawyer for another effectively giving any discussions or communications attorney client privilege and making it unobtainable. They never sat a grand jury to investigate and allowed claims of memory loss to end any avenues of inquirey.

It was a sham and that is why we are reading of disgust amongst the working attorneys and field investigators about this top-down decision.

Why do you stand for it? I'm really cursious, why would you support and defend the people who engaged in all this, just look at the new revelations just this week. What would it take for you to finally realize we can never ever allow these people not only back into the government but at the highest level. Can you imagine what they will try to get away with when the own the White House again?

 

i know, I know, I too am dumbfounded at how' it's possible to sell $20 million worth of memoirs while remembering jack

 

lol. Intent is not required.

General Petreaus had no intent, and he got busted and forced to retire in disgrace.

The submarine sailor who took a selfie on the submarine had no intent, and he got court marshaled.

hillary knew the rules, her claims of faulty memory are irrelevant.

Shes guilty of violating the Espionage Act, and should be in prison.

 

Is there some reason you cannot comprehend the law? INTENT DOES NOT MATTER when it comes to mishandling classified material. It is the fact that the material was mishandled that matters under the law.

Once the rogue Obama administration and its scofflaws judicial worms are replaced, legally speaking Hillary could then be charged with mishandling of classified materials and go to trial because Comey already admitted that she mishandled the material. It won' t happen, of course; but legally speaking it could happen.

 

It should happen.

 

You have absolutely no understanding of the law. "Intent" is irrelevant in the mishandling of classified data - you are responsible for handling it properly, no excuses.

 

He'd be up more than Hillary, I'm sure.

 

Of course I do. The FBI laid it out perfectly. Intent is very relevant in handling classified information. You have absolutely no understanding of the law when even when told the interpretation of the law you still think you are right, lol. It's embarrassing. And the funny thing is I said this months before the FBI made their decision based on an understanding of the law. The United States does not put people in jail for simply mishandling classified information. You need a lot more than that.

- - - Updated - - -

Sure they did. The FBI made it very clear. And I told you that is how the law is going to be interpreted months before the FBI told you. I laughed at your interpretation many times because of how out of touch with reality it is. You simply have no clue what you are talking about and are always wrong about everything for a reason, lol.

 

The FBI does not adjudicate the law, grand jury's and the courts do that. The government refused to take it to a grand jury. That being said the FBI did not investigate any intent so the entire basis of Comey's statement is specious, they did not investigate the point. But of course they did not investigate anything they gave everyone immunities going both way and the ones that didn't get immunity pled the 5th and of course we know even in the depositions they refuse to answer key questions. The FBI even went as far as to allow Hillary and Mills to establish an attorney client privilege thus inoculating any discussions they from inquiry.

So PLEEEEZ spare us these attempts to claim Comey cleared her or her staff of any wrongdoing.

 

Sure, the FBI recommends actions according to the law. The FBI spent a year investigating this issue and came to the conclusion no reasonable prosecutor would take this case. Not even a misdemeanor, lol. Your understanding of the law has been lacking from the very beginning. You should just ask questions instead of make comments. You're wrong about everything for a reason. I told you exactly what the law is and how it is interpreted and you still fail to this day to understand that. It's embarrassing.