Scant Evidence That Clinton Had Malicious Intent

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by Frowning Loser, May 6, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,112
    Likes Received:
    39,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The question to you is why would you accept all this for the next 4 years when she and her cronies will be in an even higher position from which to endanger the country as they sell influence and engage in their quid pro quos even when they are being investigated and start offering cushy jobs to the investigators if they destroy or damage evidence.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Your desperate conjecture is not fact. She sent and received classified information and now we know one of her cronies interfered in an investigation to try and cover it up.
     
  2. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh c'mon this is a ridiculous argument. A person can have more than 1 email account. It's the senders job to ensure that the classified is being transmitted securely.
     
  3. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She received top secret e-mails from all over ... foreign governments, our government, etc. Anyone sending e-mails to Hillary *assumed* her computer was secure.

    That was assuming too much.
     
  4. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,985
    Likes Received:
    37,717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol speaking of desperate conjecture
     
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The real quandary with Hillary is this. Would you believe her if she told you she was a liar?
     
  6. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Don't you understand that it was not (NOT) the task of the FBI to go hunting for INTENT?! The FBI was to do one thing and one thing only: determine if there was evidence of crimes, who was likely (again, based on evidence) to have committed the crimes, and then REPORT THEIR FINDINGS TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, with a recommendation to indict, or (as we've seen in the case of Hilarity) to do absolutely NOTHING.

    Then, it would be up to prosecutors in the Justice Department to decide all the esoteric fine points, like whether there was any INTENT on anyone's part to commit a crime. But FBI Director Comey was completely out of line and completely violated the FBI's charter in the way he handled this whole thing. And now, NOBODY is going to do ANYTHING about it! And that's all just fine with radical, über-liberal, Hilarity-loving Democrats because they have no respect for the LAWS of this land -- even if one of their own has broken laws (LAWS) against national security and classified information, and, made a rotten whorehouse out of the State Department of the United States for big-money donors to the Clinton Foundation!

    I hadn't thought that things could possibly get any worse in this country, but now here comes the dreaded "Obama Third Term" -- with Hilarity Clinton at the helm! :cheerleader::banana::cheerleader:
     
  7. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Secretary of State did not know she'd be sent classified information... ah yes, you're talking about clueless, brain damaged idiot Hillary, who did not know... breathtaking :wall:
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you are saying she is just stupid.
     
  9. Sage3030

    Sage3030 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    Messages:
    5,524
    Likes Received:
    2,942
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well they really only have two defenses of this situation:

    1. She is too dumb to know better.
    2. She is completely incompetent.
     
  10. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You've been wrong about everything from the beginning of this email fiasco, lol. And you're still wrong.
     
  11. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its the senders and recipients responsibility to insure classified information is being sent and received properly.

    And if the recipient receives improperly marked classified material, or receives classified material she is not authorized to receive, or receives classified material in an unsecure manner, then the recipient is required to secure the material, record the people associated with the failure, and immediately notify the proper authorties.

    Hilary failed on all counts. Intent is irrelevant. She broke the law.
     
  12. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, anyone who has access to top secret information knows they are not supposed to send it out through unsecured channels, which is why not a single document with classified headers were sent to her. The fact you guys still don't grasp this after all this time is not surprising. You're Trump supporters for a reason, lol.
     
  13. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The USA Secretary of State did not know TS would be sent to her? That's one of the most ridiculous posts ever.
     
  14. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BS!!!!! Even if she used the .gov email address you are talking about, it is not "assumed" to be secured. Anyone with top secret information knows how to send that information and it's not to personal email address or .gov addresses. How you guys still can't comprehend this stuff is beyond me. Crazy.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Yes, because no one is supposed to send top secret emails through those channels. Do you guys understand anything?
     
  15. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No. it is YOU who is supporter of a brain damaged, clueless, forgetful, lying , thieving old bat - and for a good reason.
     
  16. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, 100% right. But that's a very different argument than the senders should have assumed her email was secure which is what I was responding to.
     
  17. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's YOU who doesn't understand basic things. Like the fact everyone is instructed on how to send top secret information that associated with Hillary. Lol.
     
  18. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This also is 100% true. No one with a TS clearance would assume a .gov email address is secure. There's a protocol for sending the information.
     
  19. lemmiwinx

    lemmiwinx Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    8,069
    Likes Received:
    5,430
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    She had dozens of classified docs on her private email server that your average basement dwelling cretin could read. And now she wants to blame the leaks on Russian hackers lol!
     
  20. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes. Apparently, everyone was, except Hillary who were too, but forgot she was. Lol.
     
  21. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not according to the FBI. The FBI found no evidence Hillary intended to violate any laws which means they found no evidence she intended to receive, send, or store classified information. Sorry bud. But I'll take their expertise over your lack of expertise any day. No offense.
     
  22. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,985
    Likes Received:
    37,717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well maybe by 2020 your party Will remove its head from its ass and find a candidate who can make people care
     
  23. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    W do have a candidate. Either win or lose, Trump is a perfect candidate who raised National conciseness to a new level - illegal immigration, corruption of all the America institutions by the Democrats - Admnstration, DoJ, IRS, FBI, we'd never talk about (*)(*)(*)(*) Democrats pull was it not for Trump. If Hillary wins, so be it. We'll survive. But make no mistake - Dems (and some Repubs too) are exposed to all the crap they do like never before, and it'll be sinking in, long after the elections. Thank you, Donald and hope he can still win.

    Time to catch a few hours of sleep before flying home from Moscow, where I had fantastic couple days of R&R... see yea
     
  24. Penrod

    Penrod Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Messages:
    12,507
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    48
    This is so lame.Intent is only required by Comey not by the law
     
  25. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its you who do not understand. When the recipient receives classified material through unsecure means, receives classified material which is not marked properly, or witnesses the mishandling of classified material, the recipient is required to act to secure the material, report the infractions, and correct the problems if they are in his/her area of responsibility.

    When Hilary received those 1,000's of classified documents on her server (including 22+ TS/SCI) she was legally required to act. She did not. She broke the law.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page