Breaking : Numerous people shot outside UK Parliament .....

That woman is an ignorant loudmouthed and Islamophobic bigot working for a tabloid rag notorious for sensationalist 'news', lies and outright fabrication.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...0k-to-muslim-family-over-katie-hopkins-column

 

Democracy doesn't work in religion, you know. Qunatity is not an indication of quality. That's why university proffesors are so few and illetarate masses so many.
Again, you've obviously spend a lot of energy to study Islam for a atheist. What the hell is wrong with you? Or are you just making fools of us claiming you are not a moo-slim?

 

TH

Then why is it that there is a conversion from other religion to Islam?
and is Christianity and other religion have the same belief as in Islam?
and is beheading and other forms of atrocities committed by the Islamic extremist a form of defense?

 

And how does that compare with this??https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

 

Another poster showed me a shopping mall to demonstrate how modern Muslims are, however I tend to judge religious followers by their beliefs, actions, laws and behaviors and in all those areas Islam falls short.

So yes, Islam is primitive and we only need look their standings in the world literacy rate, poverty rate, etc. to see that. Many have too many psychological problems melding into a more modern society. Others who may be less religious and have a more modern philosophical approach to the idea of "Do unto others..." have done quite well.

 

Are you a Muslim also? Setting fire to their victims seems to be what's happening. http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...-burns-men-alive-oven-Syria-Open-Doors-report

 

Well Islam is at war with us!

 

So the Muslims don't seem much different than the Nazis, it appears.

 

Seems like their constant praying to Allah isn't working. Allah doesn't seem to love them, nor to be all-powerful like Mohammad claimed.

 

I notice no one commented on this post.

Let's try another
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...ed-off-pushed-injured-chingford-a7479766.html

or this Wiki list
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamophobic_incidents

I'm just as worried about the rise of thugs like these or internet trolls trying to whip up hatred as I am Islamic fundamentalists.

 

Given that those events occurred in 2009-2010 your worries seem to be unjustified. Check out the number of terrorist attacks internationally since then and you may get a better perspective of what's going on in the world. https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=2016

 

And how is that a defense to your statement "Diverting to he IRA may make you feel more secure but that is well past and quite a different war"?
Do you contribute to NORAID?
BTW The IRA attacks are being carried out by Christians who have killed more British people than have Muslims and have carried out more attacks this year than have Muslims.

 

What?
This was last Friday

 

Why not call the Americans to again solve your centuries old problems? http://www.economist.com/node/158356

Or, better yet, why not stick to the topic at hand?

 

Given Western Europe's penchant for multiculturalism, without consulting the people, you can expect to see a great deal more of that. You might be surprised at how many people around the world enjoy their culture jusr the way it is and don't care for the elites meddling with it. The consequences were and are inevitable.

 

Which culture is that?
The ancient Briton tribes such as the Picts or Iceni,
the Celts from central Europe,
the Romans,
the Anglo Saxons,
the Vikings,
the Normans,
the Hugonauts,
the Indians,
the West Indians,
which British culture are you talking about?

 

You seem to be saying that Britain had no significant culture over the past few centuries so little is lost. If the majority of British people feel the same way then you're probably right. You may as well have let the Nazis win WWII if British culture meant nothing. Instead Churchill, and many millions of others, thought there was something worth defending.

How wrong they were. They should have immediately surrendered and allowed another culture take over.

 

Not at all, I'm saying our culture stems from a myriad of different cultures over thousands of years.
Our culture is multiculturalism and always has been.

 

So there was no real English culture in the last few centuries, it was all 'multi-culture'? Is that what they've been teaching in your schools?

 

Yes, they didn't teach any of that white supremacy crap in school, you have to go to Brietbart or some other such rag to get that misinformed.
Like the US we have always been multicultural.
The first to try to form an ''England'' was an Anglo-Saxon called Alfred the Great. Anglo-Saxons were from modern day Germany and fought the Danes from Norway and Denmark for rule until the Normans came over and ended the dispute. This English culture you speak of is a result of waves of immigration going right back to the neolithic times.
Read a book sometime........

 

"White supremacy"?? Where did that come from?

So instead of saying, "We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender", Churchill should have said "our culture stems from a myriad of different cultures over thousands of years. Our culture is multiculturalism and always has been".

So what difference does it make, right? There never really was a British culture anyway.

 

The point is we are not in any danger of having our culture over run by marauding Muslim hordes. The vast majority integrate into and add to our evolving culture.
Those that don't will be treated as criminals and dealt with by the police.
Talk of fighting them on the beaches is panic monkery in the extreme by religious zealots and twisted nationalists with ulterior motives of their own.
British culture is fine thank you.......

 

Of course I never mentioned "marauding Muslim hordes" so you probably got that from the same place you got "white supremacy". But yes, the British culture has recently begun 'evolving' quite rapidly and will likely continue. Some Brits don't care for that and other cultures have often felt the same. Indians for example.

Just continue to explain to those who object that Britain was always multicultural anyway and that Sharia Law should be a part of this latest evolutionary experiment.

Sad to hear that Churchill has now become a panic monkery in the extreme, a religious zealot, and a twisted nationalist with ulterior motives of his own.

 

Churchill wasn't talking about a few radical terrorists, he was talking about a clear and present danger from a fully equipped foreign army. It's you that is the panic monkey not him.
As for Sharia law you can take your ignorant exaggerations and shove them.
Anti Islamic thugs are more of a danger to Britain's culture and you would hope to stir them up with your nonsense.

 

Seems there are "anti Islamic thugs" but also pro Islamic thugs. Would you agree?

Does it matter if the army is fully equipped or not? If a foreign power is out to defeat you perhaps an armed invasion isn't always the best idea. There are other ways, as has been explained by Islamic leaders themselves, but of course you're not aware of this.

You aren't aware of Sharia Law in Britain either? http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/uk-sharia-law.html

But if none of this matters to you, if Britain never really had a culture anyway, then it makes no difference. However those 'thugs' you mention may feel differently about the traditional British culture, want to protect it, and therein lies the problem for Britain and for the rest of Western Europe as well. Thugs versus thugs. Whose thugs do you think will prevail?