You stated I was "incorrect" with no factual information as to how, in a rude and confrontational way; not "civil" in any way, shape or form. Oh, and I wasn't wrong, just to be clear.
I stated you were wrong. Politely and clearly. You countered my post with no factual evidence to back it. If you are this sensitive perhaps civil debate is not for you
Wow. That's an amazing level of rationalization there. You provided no factual evidence for accusing me of being "wrong", and if you don't realize that dismissing someone as "wrong" without having facts to back it up is not civil debate. I'm sorry; at this point I see no further point to this exchange.
Why did you reply to a post that referenced "homicides" by using stats that include suicides. Eliminate suicides and your statement is false. I'm going to call you out on this everytime you do it. Stop throwing in suicide stats when responding to a post about homicides.
Tha t point has been made to him several times...suicides are tabulated when they need to legitimize the anti gun narrative to low information shills that will not question the deception.
I tried to engage you in honest discussion; a commitment you have firmly decided not to be part of. You said I was wrong without providing evidence. Now you want ME to provide "evidence" that you were wrong in accusing me of being wrong?? For the love of God, grow up!
You said I was wrong. Read the thread. And try decaf. This is just debate. You can leave any time if you can not handle it
You continuously respond to posts discussing homicides by derailing the post. Suicides are not part of a homicide discussion. Start a suicide thread if you want to discuss them.
There is one fact no gun control advocate can rebut, despite all their rantings. They can try to compare apples to kumquats and try to compare the UK directly to the U.S.... which ignores that the UK enacted stringent gun control and saw their homicide rates go up, while we made gun ownership more protected and millions more Americans have chosen to own firearms... and our homicide rates went down. An increase in deaths versus a decrease. I know which way I'd prefer to see us go.
IF you include suicides, which I feel is an inappropriate comparison. "Gun death" is a nonsensical term either way.
The particular post you responded to referred to "homicides". The appropriate counter point should have addressed what he was talking about. You repeatedly try to switch the homicide conversation with a suicide conversation. But you know this already.
Of course it is - but, understand, the anti-gun side can only argue with fallacious appeals to emotion, ignorance and dishonesty, a statement proven here every day.