Who on the left or Anti Trumpets here will denounce Antifa or all violence?

That you can't even remotely understand just why a comparison so fundamentally and profoundly wrong would illicit a claim of moral bankruptcy sure does say a lot about your opinion.


The Nazi's attacked INNOCENT BUSINESS PEOPLE because they were JEWS - untermensch, vermin to be cleansed from the reich.

Antifa (those that did) attacked a bunch of scumbag white supremacists and neo-NAZI who marched under NAZI symbology screaming NAZI slogans whose wet dreams all revolve around an American Reich.

for those that can't figure out that fundamental difference of motivation and position then perhaps intellectual banktrupcy should be added to the list.

 

Wait. You have partial Jewish blood?

 

Well stated, in my family we lost 6 people including two small ones to hitlers camps,we have their photgraphs on the wall in the livingroom as a reminder,.
Never again!! fascism must be crushed by any means necessary

 

And why were there Jews in Germany? Why couldn't they be somewhere else?

I think that if someone doesn't like me, I tend not to force my way into his living room.

 

Utterly fallacious equivalence!

Germany was NOT the "living room" of racist nazi white supremacists! Jews were living all across Europe and were as German as any other citizens. There were many who were part of German nobility.

 

Anyone still backing up this abortion of a white trash movement and the inevitable results of a the most wimpy little turd called freedom of speech which is entirely perverted by these spastic ommidsions form vacant vagians is a nazi **** and will need to be proc

Adolf certainly did his bit to disinvite Jews to Germany. Then Adolf got his white ass kicked severely. Kind of like a much bigger, more community organised antifa effort.

 

The antifa attacked PEACEFUL PROTESTORS because they were NAZIS.
No difference.

You hate the fact people you do not like have the same right to protest that you do - but there's nothing you can do about it.
Except resort to violence in an attempt to suppress free speech.
Just like the Nazis.

 

It explains why his argument rests on emotion rather than reason.

 

That's a very fascist point of view.

 

These people have the same rights as you do.
Why do you believe it is OK to use violence to suppress a point of view you disagree with?

 

Then forget about my analogy. However, you did not answer my questions: why were there Jews in Germany? Why couldn't they be somewhere else?

 

Why were there Jews in Germany? Why couldn't they be somewhere else?

 

I denounce all violence of any kind.

I will say this, we fought a war against Nazi's. We didn't necessarily do it because we were bothered with their racist and anti-Semitic views. But we also killed anyone who took up arms in support of the German government which was run by the Nazi party. We didn't give any German soldier the option to not be shot unless they surrendered outright.

Why say that? Because you need to acknowledge that even though violence isn't the answer, there is ZERO moral equivalence between the KKK, neo-Nazi's, and white supremacists and those who oppose them. ZERO equivalence. Can you admit that?

 

They're doing a fine job of removing those rights without anyone else's assistance.

Why do you believe it's OK blithely accuse people of supporting violence when you have no evidence?

The terrorist's voices inside your head don't count.

 

I believe some of them don't want to deprive minorities of their rights. They (the nazis) just don't want to live with or have anything to do with minorities.

The antifa DID engage in violence.

You shouldn't imply that he is schizophrenic just because you disagree with him. Sounds to me that leftists and people like you have no manners.

 

I denounce ALL violence.

 

Much the same as the words liberal and progressive. In my lifetime I have seen both of those words turned into perjoratives by AM radio blowhards and other so called news mediums.

 

OK then... I challenge you to:
-Openly denounce the use of violence by the antifa to suppress the right to free speech held by the nazis, etc.
-Explain why you oppose their efforts to do so.

 

Hopefully, the far right will learn to denounce violence such as that of the KKK, Tea Party, Bush imperialism, etc.

 

The only terrorists here are those that support the use of violence to suppress free speech.

 

Challenge dispensed in the toilet, where it belongs.

 

How soon the nazi free speechiness celebrants forget the white girl they murdered.

Just a "fat communist pig" as the event organiser called her, I suppose.

More free speechiness stuff, eh.

 

And thus, sufficient evidence to question why you support the use of violence by the antifa to suppress the rights of people you do not agree with.

These people have the same rights as you do.
Why do you believe it is OK to use violence to suppress a point of view you disagree with?

 

In other words, you have nothing. You cannot answer his challenge and all you have got is insults.

 

Thank you for illustrating which side of the "terrorist" line you fall on.