Alt Right is Dead

Ah - so you're in a former Soviet state; interesting.

 

By this measure, the Third Reich was supes diverse.

 

Liked w/disclaimer, and no worries; black culture itself frequently mocks the "we were kings" narrative, and long has.

 

Except no one is saying all whites, all conservatives or all alt-righters. No one is even saying most. This is a thread dedicated to trying to ignore their existence. The post you responded to pointed out that they do, indeed, exist and have an impact. Sometimes a lethal one. In absolute numbers, alt-right terrorists rival Muslim terrorists in the US. Worldwide, though, Muslim terrorists are a much bigger threat.

 

No one was saying all Muslims either.

As far as I know there has never been an alt right terrorist. So I have a hard time believing that they rival Muslim terrorists world wide.

 

Then why did you bring it up?

There have been several alt-right terrorists and attempted terrorists.

You should have trouble believing that. Worldwide, Muslim terrorists are a much bigger threat.

 

That was a memorable day indeed. I remember thinking she just lost EVERY male vote that had an ex-wife or wife like her. I actually had to look up "alt-right" and found an unknown website that was more like dems than republicans, in their prejudice of others. Clinton is the bullet we ALL dodged in 2016.

Steve

 

because of the hypocrisy.

Well the alt right really came into existence a couple of years ago so the only people that could be alright terrorists would be dylann roof and I'm not sure he was alt right. And the dude in Charlottesville that ran over a few people with his car.

That's 7 people killed. Just one incident involving a terrorist from Islamic persuasion shot and killed 49 gay people just in the short existence of the alt right. And that's not including what happened in Europe and other instances that's just one instance and it's seven times worse at the hands of one man.

I think the estimate is 11,000 people in the past couple of years killed by Islamic Terror.

Verses between 1 and 7 people depending on whether of Dylan roof was alt right killed by the alt right. As a point of fact I believe alt right is a group defined by Richard Spencer and he has denounce the actions of those people so if we can't include the terrorist acts committed by black lives matter because they deny those Acts is perpetrated by their group then the same standard must apply to the alt right.

 

What hypocrisy? In both cases, we can both acknowledge "Not all _____."

The alt-right is just a new phrase to describe an old phenomenon: the fringe right.

1) You are underestimating the number of alt-right attacks and attempted attacks. 2) I'll repeat for the third time: world-wide, Muslim terrorism is a greater threat. Here it is for a fourth time for good measure: world-wide, Muslim terrorism is a greater threat.

 

the hypocrisy where the most important thing for people with regards to Islamic Terror is to point out that it is not all Muslims. They don't seem to give a s*** that people say that it's all white people.

no it isn't it is a term coined by A specific group. That would be the group that Richard Spencer is largely the speaker for.

1) So far there is only one confirmed and that was in Charlottesville.
2) one confirmed attack versus half a dozen I don't think it's a bigger problem in the US then Islamic Terror.

And also the alt-right denounce to that person so if we're going to say the attacks by black lives matter was not their fault because they denounce these people that did it then we have to apply that same standard to the alt right.

So far the alt-right technically has zero terrorist attacks.

 

We aren't talking about the same thing. You are talking about the Richard Spencer fan club. I'm talking about the broader fringe, alternative right.

 

Sorry kid that's the alt right.

The alt right is a fringe group. But they aren't all the fringe.

Alt right means the group that Spencer speaks for.

 

Spencer never claimed to have invented the alt-right. He just coined a term for it. You are trying to start another semantic argument. I have no interest.

 

And that's what it means.

Call these mysterious white terrorists something else.

I have a hard time believing they exist. You abandoned that argument to carry on about alt right.

 

Your response can't be reconciled with the sentence it was addressed to. And I have no interest in semantics. Not even Richard Spencer defines the alt-right the same way you do.

No.

You have a hard time believing white terrorists exist? You've never heard of FEAR? Jeremy Joseph Christian? Jim David Adkisson? Wade Michael Page? Robert Lewis Dear? Frazier Glenn Miller Jr? James Harris Jackson? Mark Stroman? Keith Luke? Jerad and Amanda Miller? The Aryan Nation? And have you already forgotten about Dylan Roof and James Fields Jr. despite having already mentioned them yourself?

 

Sounds like a problem for you.

[QUOTEPAnd I have no interest in semantics. [/QUOTE]Than stop talking about it.

Sorry it is a very new group that came into being just recently.

Than you are very interested in waxing semantic.

Didn't say that. I have a hard tone believing your claim.

Yeah 2 dozen people verses 2% of 1.7 billion people? Not even close kiddo.

 

Than stop talking about it. Sorry it is a very new group that came into being just recently.

Than you are very interested in waxing semantic.

Didn't say that. I have a hard tone believing your claim. Yeah 2 dozen people verses 2% of 1.7 billion people? Not even close kiddo.[/QUOTE]
More than 2 dozen. But the fact that you are talking about "verses 2% of 1.7 billion people" demonstrates that you haven't been reading my posts. If you want to keep this about semantics and you refuse to read my posts, we're done here.

 

couldn't care less about your posts.

You have been keeping it going.

 

You meant to post in the humor section, right?

 

Then why are you responding to them? Well, "responding" is generous. You are quoting them and following up with statements that actually have little to nothing to do with them.

 

There you go with your fake news. You need to believe in lies to uphold the status quo.

 

There you go with your fake denial of real news. You need to believe the lies of the Alt Right to stay in your denial zone.

 

I think I know more about white nationalism than you or your Jewish fake news media.

 

^^^ Do you now? I doubt it.

 

lol. You presume to tell me you know what I want better than I do? ha.