MSNBC Says AR-15 as a "Military" Rifle. Whats a Mini-14?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by upside222, Oct 6, 2017.

  1. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ha ha ha you are correct on both counts. I still have a lever action .22 with a tube fed magazine had since I was 14. It looks like an old fashioned Winchester so I called it my "Winchester" .. so yes if .22 came in center fire and it exploded it would blow out the side because the magazine is held by a rod that has a spring and it is secured by a "bayonet" type slot you twist in. Funny thing is my "Winchester" was made for Sears and Roebuck LOL , I ran the serial number on a web site a few years ago and it points to my "Winchester" was made for Sears by Ruger.... so I rarely fire it but it will go to my oldest granddaughter someday.
     
    upside222 and Hotdogr like this.
  2. SiNNiK

    SiNNiK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,432
    Likes Received:
    4,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    My 30-30 is a tube fed center fire rifle.

    Just sayin.
     
  3. SiNNiK

    SiNNiK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,432
    Likes Received:
    4,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So then you consider the Mini-14 a military rifle?
     
    upside222 likes this.
  4. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What do you guys get together and study each others responses?
     
  5. SiNNiK

    SiNNiK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,432
    Likes Received:
    4,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just answer the question. Help us understand what it is that makes one a military rifle and the other a ranch rifle.
     
    upside222 likes this.
  6. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, that is basically the 19th century design I would think.
     
  7. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ok guys I said this before but no one is listening even me. We are starting to argue over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

    Look guys the AR15,uses the same caliber and cartridge as the M16.
    If you fire with the same ammunition the muzzle velocity will be the same or with a .0000223 % diference LOL ,

    Using semi auto ratevof fire both guns should have a muzzle velocity within the tolerance I invented.

    Remove the automatic option from the M16 and you sit two groundhogs side by 5 feet apart and shoot one with the AR15 , the other with the M16.

    Go examine your two groundhogs and if you are a pretty good shooter both will have died ratty much the same way.

    Ok? Sorry one more thing the idiot PITA people will scream at you the sane way for modifying the bodies of the groundhogs whether it was with a AR15 or the M15.

    Seriously guys arguing over whether the AR15 vs the M16 is a military weapon is like arguing that a muscle car with a 351 cubic inch engine with automatic transmission is a car but the same bring and model with a 351 cubic inch with a standard transmission Hurst shifter on the floor is not a car. Oh both cars are pinted the same color , Ch0rnobyl Yellow.
    Yes of course the four speed on the floor with the Hurst shifter takes more skill to drive but you can get a speeding ticket driving either of the cars at 57 miles an hour in a school zone.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2017
  8. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Exactly like the 2nd Amendment allows for. Do you live in hurricane country? How do you protect your family and property from looters? With a ball bat?
     
  9. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And it's the reason why you can't use anything but round nose ammo in a .30-30. A nose that prevents hitting the primer of the shell immediately in front. It limits the effectiveness of the round!
     
    PARTIZAN1 likes this.
  10. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    More ignorance from someone that knows nothing and lives in a bubble of willful ignorance!
     
  11. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So is a blunderbuss.
     
    Ddyad and upside222 like this.
  12. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The .22 does not use a centerfire primer!

    YOU STILL CONTINUE TO SHOW YOU KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT THE ISSUE!

    Why do you continue to post when you are absolutely ignorant on the subject at hand?

    Rounding the ammo makes it less effective. So a coyote or deer would suffer more when shot. Once again you show you have no compassion at *all*.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  13. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How would you put an M-1 in a scabbard on a horse? Would you put it behind the seat of a pickup? A .30-06 is pretty much overkill on a coyote and definitely on a prairie dog!
     
  14. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Take a look at the bullet sometime. Not the most effective shape on game.
     
  15. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'll buy that, so I'll ask the question again. The debate here is getting lost in semantics so lets bring it back to square one. The bottom line is that the AR-15, AK-47, SCAR, etc civilian versions are all semi-automatic rifles. Are you in favor of making semi-auto rifles illegal for civilian possession? The last time I asked this question the response given was "In favor of banning military style weapons", so no answer was provided....
     
    Ddyad and upside222 like this.
  16. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Unlike you some of us take the time to read the thread before popping off about something we know nothing about!
     
  17. upside222

    upside222 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your analogy is not appropriate. It's the difference between a car with an automatic shift and one with a manual shift. One makes a good car at the drag strip and the other does not!

    The M-16 with a full automatic mode (either full or burst) is different from one with only a semi-automatic mode. One is a military rifle and the other is not!
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  18. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,052
    Likes Received:
    5,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't drop it. ;)
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  19. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Is that a general question to everyone or are you targeting that specifically at me. I would prefer that in an open debate we all answer that. Question suggestion ask please ask the question as you did earlier in the post. Suggestion :
    "Are you fellow members in favor of banning semi-automatic weapons from civilian use?". We need to stay away from the terms military style weapons or scary weapons or assault weapons or tactical weapons blah blah blah. You are correct that we are in the cesspool of semantics. OMG the most liberal of the anti gun freaks especially the middle aged women think that we equip our military forces with "shot guns" . I had one say to me " you shoot with those guns so I call them shot guns" . It like listening to Idiots On Parade.

    Sorry Inam rambling who us you question directed to ?
     
  20. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not really directed at you specifically but you are free to answer.

    I'm not trying to troll folks or anything like that but am honestly just looking for an answer as to how folks feel about the issue and what they believe is the proper solution.

    I'm a Mod, I read through all of these threads which we have about 10 different ones currently active on this issue and as you said the terminology is being confused and all sides are playing semantics and ignoring the core debate in favor of being "right" in regards to terminology.

    So lets clear this up.

    The civilian AR-15 is NOT a military M4. HOWEVER, as was pointed out when the M4 is in semi-auto mode it IS virtually the exact same weapon as the civilian AR-15. Same caliber, rate of fire, muzzle velocity, etc. Never once in my entire military career and multiple deployments have I ever fired the M4 on any setting other than semi-auto while engaging the enemy. So if I were to bring my civilian personal AR-15 to combat instead of my issued M4 then there would have been a zero difference in how the weapon was used.

    Whether it IS or IS NOT a "military" weapon is irrelevant to the discussion and those who continue to make correlations between the two are doing so to play semantics.

    The PROPER question to ask is what makes a semi-auto rifle a "military" weapon? Specifically which features? Detachable magazine? Semi-automatic capability? Muzzle velocity? Caliber? etc

    The reason I ask is because I also own multiple pistols. I am issued a Beretta 9mm pistol in the military, and I was also issued a shotgun (forgot the type, pump action, I never used it). So since I own a 9mm pistol personally and I am also issued a 9mm Beretta in the Army does that classify 9mm pistols as "military weapons"? I also own a Mossberg pump action shotgun, is this a "military weapon" as well seeing how I carried one on my back for over a year in Afghanistan?

    If we can determine what specific features of a firearm classify it as "military style" then this debate can continue without 5 pages of folks playing semantics and getting absolutely nowhere on the core issue.
     
  21. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you are so good with a knife, then why do you need a gun?
     
  22. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I cannot help it if you choose to live in a bad part of the country plagued with bad weather and crime. I guess you don't have telephones where you live.
     
  23. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks for the intelligent post and explanation.
    Let's avoid the term style and speak functions. We are also talking frearms ; rifles, pistols, carbines ( shorter barreled "rifle" looking weapon for the sake of simplicity).
    The functional deliniation that we currently have in our country to draw the line between military and civilian weapons is fully automatic fire is military.
    That bump stock device almost but not exactly closes the gap for all intents and purposes.

    So anything that does not have fully automatic fire function is not military in my book. Based on that definition I will say that civilian weapons should not have fully automatic function.

    I do not advocate banning even semiautomatics from civilian use. That would be smart since that would ban the "automatic" shotgun in civilian speak.

    I would not be practical to ban semi automatics at this point even if there were legislators stupid enough to try it. There are I believe a ratio of one weapon of done type for each person in the USA so anyone who advocates banning all guns is in the words of Tillerson, a moron.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2017
  24. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for the response.

    Currently most civilian weapons do not have full auto capability. Yes civilians can purchase the legal definition of "machine guns" with the proper paperwork, however, the vast majority of weapons held my private citizens in the US are not machine guns.

    In regards to the bump stock. I for one have no issue with such a modification being banned. However, the problem lies with the fact that a bump stock is not necessary to allow a semi auto rifle to mimic a rapid fire machine gun. It does make the process easier, but it is not required. As has been demonstrated in multiple videos, folks are fully capable of "rapid" firing a stock AR-15 style weapon without the use of a bump stock or any sort of trigger modification. I can personally perform the action, it's a technique than can be learned. Using rubber bands and/or the belt loop trick to rapidly fire a semi auto rifle is also common.

    This is where the debate takes a turn. Will banning bump stocks prohibit individuals from rapidly firing their semi auto rifles to mimic the rate of fire of full auto weapons? The answer is no. The same process can be mimicked using specific firing techniques and/or rubber bands and belt loops.

    When it comes to discussing firearm legislation I believe the purpose of such legislation should be to prevent something from occurring or making it more difficult for something to occur. Banning bump stocks will not achieve the desired result for the aforementioned reason which is why I believe such a ban to be pointless and simply a response to the recent tragedy to "do something" even though that "something" being proposed will have no effect in preventing folks from being able to do what the Vegas shooter did that day.

    When it comes to legislation to possibly reduce gun violence do you have any suggestions? I ask simply because I believe myself to be a fairly rational man and I have honestly sat down and looked at this issue from a non biased point of view and I do not see how any legislation could have prevented the Vegas shooter from doing what he did.

    The responses I've seen so far will not have the desired effect in my opinion. I've heard proposals to ban semi-auto rifles outright, instill a gun buyback program to remove them from society, ban the sale of ammunition, and instill hefty fines/prison sentences for those who do not comply. All of these proposals ignore the fact that there are currently 300 million + firearms in the US, over half of which are unregistered, and an untold amount of ammunition all around the country with no current database to track any of it. So I feel that no matter what legislation is passed, there will still be 300 million + guns here and literally millions of pounds of ammo. How do we contend with that?
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  25. Right is the way

    Right is the way Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    1,584
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree I drive a manual daily I definitely makes your feel more ar one with your truck.
     

Share This Page