Trump's staff coordinated with the Russians during the election

So you have heard the recent news right? Hillary's election scandal, money laundering, lying to the American people, her confession, destroying Bernie's chance, all because she took over the DNC. I bet you think Obama wasn't involved.

When are you going to admit you screwed up?

 

You know all the names you call Trump. Only makes your precious Hillary and democrat's look worse than the names you call Trump. After-all he beat them. He is the president.

 

She paid 9 million for the dossier. Are you still under the Hillary/liberal spell?

 

Trump's election was a sure thing from the start.

“Record High in U.S. Say Big Government Greatest Threat, Now 72% say it is greater threat than big business or big labor”, by Jeffrey M. Jones, Gallup, 12/18/13.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166535/r...syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=All

Which is why Trump did not bother to run ads or waste money on a big campaign staff.
He knew he could not be beaten by any Big Government establishment pol.

 

He's known it from the very beginning. He is a control freak. Some of his closest associates had contact with the Russians, to include a former campaign manager, his current attorney general, his son, and his son-in-law. Trump not knowing their involvement with the Russians is ludicrous. Manafort's involvement with Russia goes back a decade or more.

Trump didn't know? Either he didn't know or he is a very poor manager. Those are the only two choices.

If he is that bad of a manager, what kind of a President will he make?

Trump supporters, take your pick. Which is it? He is either oblivious to his surroundings or he is a lousy manager.

 

And that relates to this thread how? Did you jump on the wrong thread? Who here is concerned about an election that happened a year ago?

Are Trumpians really that desperate?

Try to keep up. This thread concerns the fact that Trump and his staff are guilty as hell in their collaboration with a hostile foreign power that interfered in our election.

 

How many times can a Trumpian be wrong in one post?

Your first sentence is absurd. On Election Day, Trump thought he was going to lose.

Are Trumpians so concerned about Trump's guilt that they want to re-hash an election that happened a year ago?

Your article is dated 2013.

Big government has been a concern for Americans for the past 50 years. It didn't begin with Trump in 2016.

Trump was limited by his war chest in running ads. That he was saving money because he knew he was going to win is ludicrous to the point of being humerous.

Which brings me to my last point. By now even Trumpians have realized they really messed up. They won't admit their error, so they paper it over with humor. We see more and more of that with their posts. They are becoming laughable.

 

Personally, I could give a rat's ass about Hillary and the Dems. Jail her and throw away the key for all I care. Hillary and the Dems are responsible for Trump, the worst President this country has ever known, and you know it.

Which is why you are trying to change the subject.

 

This is a pathetic attempt to change the subject. The election happened a year ago. Trumpians are so desperate that they are trying to make some kind of scandal out of all this to draw attention from Trump. The attempt itself is ludicrous, transparent, and sad in way. Sad because Trumpians are trying to find something, anything, to act as a diversion because Mueller is closing in and they know it.

Tell me something. How did I screw up?

 

The post included evidence against Trump and his staff.

It is obvious Trumpians can't handle that. They are not fans of reality.

 

You have no evidence against trump

This just an excuse for liberals to nullify an election they did not like

 

Give it up no evidence.

 

I am not pulling the "I told you so". If you are referring to the dossier, it was paid for. It's a fraud, it's a 9 million dollar lie.......admittedly. So if your not referring to the dossier, what are you referring to?

 

How to rig a presidential election.

Step one is to tell the truth about the candidate

 

A candidate running for president, is and will "influence" a voter. That's what it's all about, "influencing" voters, for that particular person. So what's the problem?

 

For hillary and the DNC the truth hurts and theyd rater the voters didnt hear it

 

It is without question, that when Hillary's mouth is open, people are hearing nothing but lies. All politicians are there, but Hillary is something far darker.

 

They can easily hack into an I-Phone but it takes awhile because of all the security features. The issue with the San Bernardino terrorists was that the FBI were asking Apple to give them a program that would shut down certain security features, like the password limit. Iphones have a security feature in place that locks the phone for 24 hours after 5 wrong passwords. The FBI asked apple to make a program that would bypass that feature. Apple refused because they didn't want to give a program that would allow the FBI to hack any Iphone at any time.

Apple did offer to unlock the terrorists' phone, but the FBI wanted to have the program so they could unlock suspects phones without needing to go to Apple everytime.

The FBI could have eventually unlocked the phone on their own, but it would have taken weeks. They have a program that puts in every possible password combination, but every 5 wrong passwords the phone locks for 24 hours. With the program they were asking Apple to make, they could unlock the terrorists phone within day.

 

If entertainer John Oliver can so deftly make a mockery of stumblebum trumpery, just imagine what the Trump Justice Department Special Prosecutor can do with it.

​

 

Or he is appointing people of corruption to expose them, and gathering other information from them. To expose others.

 

Focus: "Record high".

“Record High in U.S. Say Big Government Greatest Threat, Now 72% say it is greater threat than big business or big labor”, by Jeffrey M. Jones, Gallup, 12/18/13.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166535/r...syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=All

Get it?

 

Including himself?

 

Only time will tell. Other than that, pure speculation.

 

Indeed, Trump selecting such sleezebags to serve him shatters any delusions concerning his executive competence, but I hope that Mueller is unable to nail him for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Ayatollah Pence would bring legislative skill to the office, and he would successfully collude with extremist elements in Congress.

 

True, he did let some Obama staffers stay.