The only foolish person here is the one that actually is not embarrassed to admit in public that Obama created jobs. He didnt unless you cant do simple math. I also noted you didnt answer if youd rather work two part time jobs instead of one full time. Why....did obamas ideology not work for you in that scenario...because thats exactly what the mother ****er did to our full time jobs.
I did look them up and also noticed that economists were giving Trump credit for what BO the Peep couldn't do. Economists agree: Trump, not Obama, gets credit for ... thehill.com/opinion/finance/368904-economists-agree-trump-not... The Wall Street Journal asked 68 business, financial and academic economists who was responsible for the strengthening of the economy, and most “suggested Mr. Trump’s election deserves at least some credit” for the upturn. Note that's the same economists that gave credit to the Utterer Stutterer for having the 3rd weakest performance in growth with sustaining an economy.
Since obviously the gains in employment under Obama embarrass you perhaps you can provide your data to show how the jobs created under Trump are high paying . And no it was Bush that caused the recession and loss of jobs not Obama. Get a grip on reality.
Ok, I read through these, most of the rules he killed were proposed rules, not actual laws. Some of them I really disagree with such as mandatory efficiency rules on new air conditioning units, vehicle to vehicle communication which will be necessary for increased safety systems on our roads, and several items ment to limit pollution. There are a few that I agree with such as reporting regulations for small businesses that would actually have a large effect on overall costs but many of these were fought against by large corporations and billionaires. The first line in one of your links is “The Senate voted to overturn an Obama administration rule Thursday aimed at preventing coal-mining operations from dumping waste into nearby waterways, the first of nearly half-a-dozen rule reversals headed to President Trump’s desk for his signature this month.” So your reasons why Trump is a great president is that he is allowing companies to pollute... I’m really at a loss for words
What part of " at least some" do you not understand the meaning of. And do you onow what GDP growth was for 2017?
Sorry, but as is often the case, reality is in stark contrast to conservative claims. It is a demonstrable fact Obama holds the record for most consecutive months of jobs growth of any US president, because there was no "job killing" regulations.
Name Obama's policies which caused all this job growth. The funny thing is that all 3 democrat candidates ran on creating jobs.
Trump is letting corporations get rich by killing the environment. Trump wants to kill all those things Barry did to make him the President with the title of the longest job producing President. Trump wants to kill that. Steve N wants to kill that.
Did Obama create more full time jobs than were lost? Yes or no. Please keep in mind virtually everyone reading knows the truth.
Most of the illegal immigration here is due to individuals overstaying their visas, not jumping the wall. We definitely need to enforce our laws, I am a huge proponent of mandatory e-verify as well as massive penalties for corporations found to be using illegal immigration. Building a physical wall is a poor waste of resources though, we have to make the environment unfriendly enough that they can not make it once they arrive - denying illegals any source of taxpayer funds would help tremendously. Our healthcare before Obamacare was the most expensive in the world and we received a lower level of care than most other first world nations. It was not working. I am not saying the ACA improved anything but what we had is not something we should strive to return to.
says the guy wasting electricity posting on the intetnet. Electric company and server companies are loving your support of destroying the environment to satiate your need to internet post.
No they don't and you can't find any data to support your bogus claim. Hell, apparently you can't even tell Obama from Bush.
It is worth noting that the change does not allow coal miners to dump pollution into the rivers, it allows them to dump waste (also called overburden). This refers to the overlying rock that the coal is buried under. It does not refer to mine tailings. Currently mountaintop removal, coal mining operations blast the overburden and then use trucks to haul it away and dump it somewhere - usually in a valley. Under the new rules the companies would be allowed to use bulldozers to simply push the material into the stream to be washed away. Obviously all this material will be harmful to the stream, but not really in the form of pollution. In order for the harmful compounds to be leached in to the water the material must be finely-divided (giving it orders of magnitude more surface area). The biggest environmental effect will be making more coal mines viable and making coal cheaper. Also then there is the fact of companies will be fined and will be forced to come up with ways to protect waterways and with clean up. Therein creating more jobs. Oh and did you forget the courts again? Wherein the left won't be able to play headgames with he courts. Do all that judge shopping they do.
Its your claim he created jobs. Its a bull **** claim. Your math is bailing the water from the back of the boat to the front. Its ridiculous.