NATO's nightmare

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Zorro, Jul 6, 2018.

  1. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,582
    Likes Received:
    52,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why should we be worried about the Russian threat to Norway.... than Norway is?!? Bottom line, it's their country. We can no longer function as the world's piggybank, we are putting OUR needs first, just like everyone other nation does.
     
    roorooroo likes this.
  2. Mamasaid

    Mamasaid Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2018
    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    1,218
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because any war that ensued after an invasion of Norway would cost us much more than it would cost Norway, or anyone else, for that matter.
     
  3. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,582
    Likes Received:
    52,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Norway won't defend Norway, why should the US defend Norway?

    We can only help those willing to help themselves.

    LAUGHING STOCK
    Germany’s soldiers forced to use BROOMSTICK for a gun as Donald Trump blasts Angela Merkel over NATO spending

    The highly embarrassing episode, revealed in a leaked report, is just the beginning of the country's woes as it fights to reverse chronic army shortages

    What a farce

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/67435...-donald-trump-angela-merkel-defence-spending/
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2018
    roorooroo likes this.
  4. Mamasaid

    Mamasaid Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2018
    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    1,218
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Norway will defend Norway, but they could not do so successfully against russia or a russian led coalition.
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2018
  5. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,582
    Likes Received:
    52,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I wish them luck, they are about 20% even the bare minimum spending they themselves committed to military spending as part of the NATO alliance.
     
  6. T_K_Richards

    T_K_Richards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2016
    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please explain how the US will benefit if Luxembourg, Norway, etc. increase their defense spending?

    Why don't we just decrease our defense spending? That would really enable us to do some great things domestically.
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2018
  7. Mamasaid

    Mamasaid Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2018
    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    1,218
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm sure that's comforting.
     
  8. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We should invade Luxembourg. It's not like it could do anything about it but whine.
     
  9. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I suppose I should post that you are trolling for Putin, huh?
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2018
    TheGreatSatan likes this.
  10. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,510
    Likes Received:
    6,752
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because in a major war in Europe if the Russians seized major air bases in Norway (like Bodo) then they could effectively threaten the U.S. ability to move shipping across the North Atlantic.
     
  11. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,582
    Likes Received:
    52,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everything they pick up in defense of their own county is that much less we have to spend in blood and treasure if they are endangered, and its their fkn county. Further, in order to be part of an effective self-defense pact, you should be able to offer assistance if one of the other nation's in the pact needs help. If you do not prepare to do that, you are just a free-loader and we shouldn't put our population at risk of a Nuclear exchange to protect free-loaders.

    If they value the mutual self-defense pact, they need to increase their military expenditures to at least the NATO minimum, which they are currently missing by 77%. Another free-loading farce.
    Well, one barrier is all these excessively expensive mutual defense commitments with a bunch of free-loaders.
     
  12. ronv

    ronv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2018
    Messages:
    20,312
    Likes Received:
    8,774
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Did anyone mention guidelines? Or 2024? Must be in there somewhere.
    I think someone did mention Treaty. Doesn't Congress do treaties?
     
  13. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,582
    Likes Received:
    52,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wish they would simply make at least the minimum NATO standard of 2% GDP in military spending, but if they don't want to, clearly that's their choice, ultimately, it's country. So two things,
    1. We don't have a mutual defense agreement with Panama, but any nation making an aggressive move on the canal would be committing an act of war against the US.
    2. If Norway is foolish, gets their ass in a bind and wants Uncle Sugar to bail their free-loading asses out, then we will determine what our best interests are at that time, but, if Trump's making the deal, it won't be a freebie, I can pretty much guarantee you that it would be cheaper for them to consistently make, at least, their minimum NATO spending commitments.
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2018
  14. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But they do spend on their own defense and enough to counter any threat there currently is.

    Yes trough NATO

    But the US doesnt, when was NATO ever used to defend any european country? The only time it was used was in defense of the US and it costed NATO members lives to defend the US.

    Again the high defense spending from the US have little to do with "defending europe" and everything to do with projecting power arund the world and defending us intrests around the world, that and starting some stupid wars like iraq in 2003 thats costed trillions.
     
  15. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep once more he got donald to do the dirty work for him the undermine NATO.

    Seeing how cheap he got donald putin is a genious.
     
  16. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thats simply not true.

    Yep the rest can be used but there was some issue with a sensor .


    The US has been increasing its defense spending the last decades.

    ANd what do you fear to justify that high defense spending btw?
     
  17. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NATO doesn't seem to Value the US role in it. They disrespect the US by not meeting their quota and then b**** at the US when we complain about it. With friends like Europe who needs enemies?
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
    roorooroo likes this.
  18. Grokmaster

    Grokmaster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    55,099
    Likes Received:
    13,310
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So much for "Trump doing Putin's bidding". Do I need to BUST OUT the Obama Groveling for Putin Collection...AGAIN?


    The Russian pipeline to Germany that Trump is so mad about, explained



    BERLIN — When German officials headed to the NATO summit in Brussels this week, they were already prepared for what they considered to be an inevitable attack by President Trump over their low defense spending.

    But on Wednesday morning, Trump took aim at the Germans for a very different reason: an 800-mile-long, planned pipeline beneath the Baltic Sea. The German government has been pursuing its Nord Stream 2 project for years, despite criticism from the United States and some Eastern European nations.

    Trump renewed the long-standing U.S. criticism of the project on Wednesday, and doubled down by tying it to the future of NATO. “Germany, as far as I’m concerned, is captive to Russia because it’s getting so much of its energy from Russia,” Trump told NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, speaking on camera. “We have to talk about the billions and billions of dollars that’s being paid to the country we’re supposed to be protecting you against.”


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...o-mad-about-explained/?utm_term=.1e245751f04b




    IN addition to THIS:

    Nato spending.jpg
     
  19. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't get why NATO isn't begging us to stay in.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  20. jay runner

    jay runner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    16,319
    Likes Received:
    10,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why the hell would the USA sign a treaty with most of those European nations in the first place? That was not good.
     
    TheGreatSatan likes this.
  21. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    France didn't let one of our jets fly over one time and got a bunch of American Pilots killed. I could care less about France. I also wouldn't mind seeing the EU and Russia duke it out while we watch from the sidelines.
     
    jay runner likes this.
  22. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,640
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True...
    But in getting NATO members to live up to their commitments, NATO only becomes stronger.
     
    TheGreatSatan likes this.
  23. jay runner

    jay runner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    16,319
    Likes Received:
    10,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Patrouille Acrobatique de France flies the Dassault Alpha introduced in the early 1970's -- and they ain't a much compared to the Blue Angels who fly the F/A-18 Hornet or Thunderbirds who fly the F-16 Fighting Falcon.

    Of course France just ain't a much anyway, especially an Islamicized France
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  24. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Putin's master plan is to send his puppet Trump over to Nato to get all the countries in NATO to spend more on their defense...

    Brilliant!!!
     
    jay runner likes this.
  25. webrockk

    webrockk Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    25,361
    Likes Received:
    9,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Trump has a talent for letting us know how his effete globalist predecessors put America last.
     

Share This Page