Elizabeth Warren's DNA test says there was a Native American ancestor 6 -10 generations ago....

First tell me what an NPC is

 

He basically said that:
1. If he were to debate Warren
2. And Warren were to bring up her Native DNA
3. He would throw her a DNA test
4. And if that DNA test came back positive
5. He would give her a million dollars

None of these steps of the bet were fulfilled.

 

Yes. But he didn't even say "came back positive", he said "if it proves you're an Indian." I was asking poster LNC to show the evidence of his claim that "Fatboy only asked for a DNA test proving lineage."

 

Could be this

 

Trump should not pay Warren no matter what. "progressives" would not pay if the situation were reversed. Screw the progs, give them a taste of their own playbook.

Trump manipulated fauxahontas into making a fool of herself.

 

That's really all this is about, 'fauxahontas' performed exactly as Trump expected and made a magnificent fool of herself, she's offended the Native Americans, facilitated national discussion of her perfidious claims of ethnic identity and suggested Democrat leadership thinks DNA traces matter more than life experience when claiming membership in a minority. I think Warren, who just a few days ago was a leading Democrat presidential contender has doomed her campaign and probably alienated a few of the more sensitive Democrat minority voters as they consider the midterms.

 

Sorry, Te. When I glance over at 'today's' rising stars among 'Progressive Democrats', what I see (as I said) are creatures like Corey Booker, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, et al. Not a bit interested in any of THAT. I agree that all the old farts need to give up the power slots to younger, more 'elastic' minds -- but WHO...?

I certainly won't 'slam the door' on Amy McGrath, or on John Kasich, for that matter. I'm willing to consider anyone who can really fundamentally HELP this country. The trouble is that now our need for comprehensive, intelligent, real leadership is so acute that we really DO need someone very much like John F. Kennedy. But, so far, I'm not seeing one -- anywhere in either major political party. And, in my opinion, time is running out....

 

Joe Manchin

 

For Max hating trump is always the topic

 

Meaning that some of the trump haters posting here might not even be human

 

Since I as a then party loyalist, did vote for John Kennedy. But the man died. And due to that event, suddenly he became the lion to Democrats. As president he scared me. Not enough to stop me from voting for LBJ but he scared the hell out of me.

The closest we ever got to war against the Soviets was when he was president. The Soviets were angry at the man. And he rubbed it into their faces.

We do not need one more JFK. After he died, suddenly he was a hero. God only knows why.

 

Possible. I was thinking Non-Profit Charities.

 

Literally all JFK had to do was move some antiquated missiles from Turkey that they were planning on phasing out in two years anyways. Instead he bluffs and almost brings us to the brink of nuclear war. If you want to save face then just publicly announce that for some reasons the Russians are worried about our old missiles in Turkey so we ill move up the schedule for their decommissioning. You wouldn't lose any face since they had already planned to remove them and he could have avoided all of that mess and the Russians would have given up far more by removing their Cuban missiles than we would have giving up the missiles in Turkey.

 

Even if we use her test results, Te, and with the average length of time for one generation of 35 years, we're looking at 1739 as the most recent year, and 1599 as the most distant. I can't help but admire your loyalty to old 'Dizzy Lizzy', but honestly, she doesn't deserve it....

."In a vision I saw that in the year 1949, one of our progeny will be born as an idiot!"

 

I don't want us to get horribly off-topic, but ask yourself what would have happened if Kennedy hadn't forced Khrushchev to get those Soviet nuclear-equipped missiles out of Cuba. Old Nikita thought Kennedy was an indecisive puppy who would freeze if challenged. He thought wrong. Parenthetically, if you voted for 'Lyin' Lyndon', you voted for the Vietnam War. In retrospect, ask yourself what was going through your mind when you did that. But let's discuss it in a different thread....

 

OK, back to JFK. Why did the Soviets feel threatened enough to defend Cuba with extreme weapons of war? What had the then my president done to Cuba?

I have discussed many times the gross errors I made by voting for Democrats and also named the mistakes of LBJ, We could take it deeper if that is your desire. I made terrible mistakes is why.

I must remind readers that when I first voted for LBJ, we were not in a full combat role in Vietnam. It blew up once LBJ became president or in the spring of 1965. My vote for him was in 1964. I had no clue he intended to wage war in Vietnam.

 

What kind of aircraft did he design?

 

All Khruschev wanted was for the US to remove missiles from Turkey. That's it. At the time he wasn't aware that we were planning on removing them in a couple years anyways with the onset of more nuclear platforms coming online so we wouldn't have given up anything important. The Democrats would have given up a more strategic location in Cuba than the US by far since we still have missiles all over other European countries.

 

Warren flunked her DNA test.

 

The Cherokees had blacks in their tribe? Is that possible?

 

It mean's THIS.

By my count we actually have a dozen NPC's here on this very board. I'm not saying every left-leaning poster is an NPC, far from it, but the ones who use the same catchphrases and words over and over again? Those would be them.

 

Onus is ENTIRELY ON YOU to substantiate that bogus allegation of yours with CREDIBLE NONPARTISAN sources.

 

You don't get to make that ARBITRARY decision!

The DNA proves that Warren had a native american ancestor within the last 6 to 10 generations.

No amount of footstomping hissyfit reality denial by BLOTUS supporters alters that scientific fact!

 

Have you ever stopped and analyzed JFK's leadership?

He had charisma in spades but that alone is not enough.

He had the ability to give a speech but that alone is not enough.

He had a serious problem with the Soviets kicking our ass in space but that alone was not enough.

So like a true leader he came up with a VISION for a future that would INSPIRE and MOTIVATE the nation in a way that solved his problem with the Soviets.

That was his greatness. You can see it in FDR with his speech about "fear" too. St Reagan did it with his "morning in America". All of them had both the vision and the ability to motivate others to achieve their vision. Compare that to Bush sr admitting that he never "understood that vision thing" and his idiot son who had absolutely ZERO leadership abilities when the nation desperately NEEDED them more than ever. McCain should have been POTUS back then because he did have the ability to RISE to that challenge.

You are NOT going to find that leadership ability by just dismissing all potential candidates out of hand. In essence you need to become a student of leadership and look for that potential. Once you learn how to do it then you know who to support and who to avoid.

 

Your estimate of generations is WAY OFF the mark. 25 years is much closer to REALITY so her most distant ancestor would be 1768 and the most recent 1868.

Your endless attempts to disparage her says volumes about the potential threat she poses to your BLOTUS in 2020.