New study refutes climate-change alarm

Except they don't say that, now you are just lying.

 

What the heck are you even talking about.

Here is the actual study which I've studied to verify the source.

You should try it.

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/4/eaav7337

 

I recommend that you stop digging this hole for yourself since it is readily apparent from the dearth of subject matter knowledge in the content above that you don't have idea of what is actually happening.

 

Ironic PROJECTION duly noted and ignored for derogatory reasons.

WND and Breitbart are LYING and you are just regurgitating their lies.

 

Is Thinkprogress lying also because they also said it.

You can scroll up to read their article on it.

Now why would they be agreeing with Brietbart?

Is it a conspiracy?

 

Which part of this needs to be explained?

 

That is utterly ABSURD!

The Thinkprogress article DEBUNKED the LIES of WND and Breitbart!

 

Um they verified the point I made in my first post in this thread.

They said sea level's rising would take hundreds and hundreds of years.

Now I have sourced everything for you and I can't help you any further.

 

You DISINGENOUSLY CHERRY PICKED that one sentence OUT OF CONTEXT!

Here is the PART that you REFUSE to admit exists!

That says that sea levels would be RISING by a FOOT PER DECADE in just a few decades.

Do you have any idea how SERIOUS that would be and how SOON that will BEGIN?

 

You mean like those still screaming uselessly at the sky since Trump was elected?

 

upgrading existing cities can free up land for greenspace.

 

Energy isn't for everyone..... just the elite who can afford their own version of smug...

 

upgrading existing Cities means making more efficient use of space.

 

I think it's obvious that I know how bad your thinking is. However, this level of bad thinking still surprised me.

 

Yeah, but you aren't capable of understanding a simple thought experiment. Doesn't that make you think that you probably don't understand reality?

 

Your only recourse is ad homs? That seems unlikely to challenge anyone. The difference is that when folks like you preach about cost not being an issue, you sound tone dear, and mean. And when you stretch that towards making personal attacks, well that just makes the image clearer for everyone else.

Why try so hard? Clearly, you don't actually care about the regular folks, just the smug that your own personal satisfaction generates. What's that word again?? oh yeah... selfish.

 

No, that's not ad hominem. You legitimately aren't smart. You know that right?

 

Never read these studies, my ideas are my own

 

What if you are wrong? Would you be thrilled that the world is not going to end? Or angry about being mistaken?

 

Who said that the world was going to end?

The planet will continue to exist for another 5 billion years until the Sun goes into supernova mode.

The issue is altering the climate to the point where it becomes uninhabitable for ourselves.

To put it crudely you don't eat and defecate in the same place for obvious reasons. What is happening now is that we are defecating all over our own food supplies. Either we stop screwing ourselves over or we go extinct.

The choice should be obvious to anyone who thinks about it.

 

What an amazing admission on your part. If I'm not smart, running circles around your hapless argumentation means what for you?

 

Then you mean our world is going to end? Just to clarify. Personally, I am hopeful that you are wrong. And happy to receive scientific arguments to the contrary.

 

No, that is what you were trying to say because I already know what I mean.

Being hopeful does not address the very real problems that we are currently experiencing.

Reading bogus crap like the OP disinformation just plays into your Confirmation Bias. It has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with actual science.

 

I agree that our world may end and most probably will. However, since I believe in God, I think it will end when He says so. I also think it will end a lot faster if a majority of people believe in babies being aborted after they are born than anything we do or don't do about climate change.

 

Liberals, November 2016.