New study refutes climate-change alarm

Now, to be clear... some part of you finds this convincing in some way??

 

Convincing of many things they have found and that the scientific community agrees with.

You don't find it interesting that they found that even at high level's of Co2 that it will take hundreds and hundreds of years for the seas to rise?

Kind of puts a big hole in the alarmists rhetoric doesn't it?

 

I mean.. is that really what you took form that? Haven't you learned that you aren't very good at thinking?

 

Why wouldn't I take it from there, they are the one's that discovered it and put it in writing.

It's also important because with liberals wanting to change policy on this issue in extreme ways, we need to see what the urgency is.

We now know there isn't any urgency.

No matter what we do it will take centuries for it to start showing measurable effects that hamper us.

By the time sea levels rise to affect our coastal cities we will already be living in space so it will be nothing more than a pretty picture from our spacecraft.

"Look honey, that's where we had a city called NY at one point in our history."

 

None of that is said anywhere.

 

New technology all the time. The latest battery replacement.



The storage technology is relatively straightforward. Sunlight focused on the top of a 540-foot tower heats molten salt to more than 1,000°F, and that hot liquid is transferred to a storage tank, where it retains most of its heat. Regardless of the time of day, when electricity is needed, the molten salt can be used to heat water, creating steam to turn turbines, and generate electricity.
----------------------------

The Saudi firm said this year that the combination of solar tower and storage and solar PV will enable baseload power to be delivered to the Middle East and Africa at a lower cost than conventional fossil fuels.


https://www.aiche.org/chenected/2015/05/molten-salt-storage-forefront-solar-tech-evolution

 

That is because it took “hundred and hundreds of years” for the CO2 to rise

 

For someone who has repeatedly claimed on this forum that they are doing tertiary study you seem unable to apply critical thinking skills to research

 

Why don't you focus on learning how to think rather than terrible articles that don't say anything? Wouldn't you rather be right?

 

One question.

How heavily are you invested in your magic science?

 

You too, how deeply invested are you in your magic science?

 

You too, how heavily invested are you in your magic science?

 

You too, how heavily invested are you in your magic science?

 

It wasn't an article, it was a peer-reviewed study from highly respected climate scientists.

The fact you can't and won't accept their findings is your problem.

 

Still waiting for you to dispute the claims in their findings

It's rather funny how all the left orientated posters on this forum have suddenly turned into trolls.

Afraid to discuss the contents of the research?

 

Do you think those were the findings?

 

Yes, I copy and pasted their own words.

How could you not think those were their findings.

They specifically said that sea levels will not rise for hundreds of years.

 

Another massive load of bovine excrement!

 

Wrong again!

Breitbart is LYING about the findings in that study that you NEVER bothered to read for yourself.

 

Of course I did, and the study says it, Brietbart and Thinkprogress, a conservative and liberal source both quoted it and I provided those quotes to you.

I provided the source for the study so go read it yourself.

It's sad that something can so easily be denied by you lefties in the face of pure proof.

 

No, you are disingenuously CHERRY PICKING from that article.

Why did you OMIT all of the above in order to provide a FALSE impression of what the study is ACTUALLY saying?

 

It puts a MASSIVE HOLE in your credibility since you disingenuously IGNORED the part where sea levels will rise in JUST DECADES!

 

That you are UNABLE to distinguish between the ORIGINAL STUDY and an ARTICLE about the study says volumes.

 

Thank you for confirming that you really have no idea at all what you actually looking at.

 

It's irreversible anyways since the planet does it on it's own.

By the time we would effect it the planet would have done it anyways.



Unless you don't believe that natural warming based on the tilt of the Earth happens.

I guess that stopped when we invented cars huh?