A like for the effort at least, I 'spose. Fact is weirder than fiction at times. Quite frankly I couldn't care less if you believe me or not.
Sure. You've only posted about it 100 times, but I'm sure that's not trying to impress people. http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?search/22419333/&q=wall+street&o=date&c[user][0]=75286
It's amazing how all of your arguments depend on others having bad attitudes toward women or fear of women or some latent hatred of women.
I'm starting to think that feminists are narcissistic. Everything they say is about how great they are. Or how they should be treated better or revered. They'll drop their credentials dubious is they may be over and over and over as if to give some sort of credence to the nutty crap they say. The truth is you can get a degree in flat Earth studies that doesn't mean you're an expert in the shape of the Earth. But what do I know I'm only posting this because I'm threatened by strong women.
Come on now the only reason you don't believe her it's because you secretly resent women and you're threatened by a strong female. Admit it... Lol
It's funny because I heard the theory that breaks feminists down into three groups. Group i; this is the largest group of feminists. They are the ones that are so ugly that you couldn't get the dog to play with them if you tied a pork chop to them. These are the foot soldiers. Group ii; this is the second largest group.t they are what make it palatable for the normies. The beautiful women who are little more than beautiful and feel like they need something more than just beauty. They desperately don't want people to think that they are as empty and vapid as they truly are. So they cling onto feminism. The Emma Watson's of feminism. Group III; the brains, these are the least common feminists they're the generals. Lesbians, a certain type of lesbian though b because some lesbians are just great. These are the feminist lesbians they're typically older and possibly just engaging in lesbian relationships to be ultra feminist. They teach college courses or seminars designed for the feminist foot soldiers. Group i, group ii doesn't need training, they have looks and group i does a good job at inducting them. You'll likely never encountered a group iii feminist or if you do you won't know it. They are focused on the freshman into the group if you will. They would get bogged down and irritated with explaining the minutia. I don't take this seriously but I thought it was funny.
Bit of an update..... My friend is getting them every other weekend, has a new job he's settled into and has an agreement he can work at home every friday (with enough time to drop his children to school before he starts). The judge has told him when he has settled in into the job he and the mother can organise the children can overnight visit mid week, each week. The court suggested Wednesday for the over night (as at the time he wasn't sure what day he would be working from home). The mother is being her usual horrible self, not allowing the children to stay over mid week. As he wants them Thursday night as it ties in with his working schedule. Anyways she was informed he wanted them on Thursday night by his lawyer and asked her politely to consider changing days. Her official response was along the lines of, "I don't want him to have them Thursday as I will get less money from him" (in the uk, the more the children stay with the dad the less the father has to pay the mother for child support. Law see's it as the father is having to feed, care, and pay for the children when they are in his care, so that money doesn't go to the mother). This is good new!!!! Even though she's being her horrible usual self and denying her children from seeing their day, its on an official signed document that the mother is denying access purely on the reasoning that he will pay less child support the more he see's his children. My friend is now extremely positive now he has thus evidence and had booked an appearance in court. Fingers crossed that the court will see her for what she is, using the children to be handed free money. And the court will really come down on her and force her to allow the children to see their dad every Thursday night (sleep over ) and a sleep over every other weekend. Fingers crossed...
I have nothing against strong women. I have an issue with vitriolic and hateful women. Especially those who are oblivious to their own behaviour.
Women are stunning and brave okay all women. There is no such thing as a vitriolic hateful woman. What women do is they rage against the patriarchy and sometimes that comes off as hateful and vitriolic. The funny thing about this is I'm being sarcastic and mocking feminism but it's hard to tell. You know it's ridiculous when it's impossible to parody something. But I was mocking the argument that people who disagree with feminism harbor some latent resentment for women. It's of course that wasn't clear.
No shiet. Kind of hard to read sarcasm over the internet tho. https://www.theodysseyonline.com/christy-sheats-murder-daughters-feminism Feminism: Not even once.
I've posts like that and people didn't realize it was sarcasm. I just think it gets that nutty with some people.
Though a Gay man may have some insight into lesbians, they clearly have no idea what a "Feminist" is or what they do. I could be termed a feminist in that I stand up for a womans rights and think they are wonderful in many ways. I have not noted your "Interesting" evaluation of the term however.
My mistake as the reply was intended for another poster.....I'll attempt correction. It must have something to do with the ignore function as I cannot find the post by Polydectes….my apologies.
I make a point....and I’ll keep making it. His insight was very important. You sound jealous.... why is making a point trying to impress? This is something else I use in my course. If I repeated that I am poor and talked about the injustices I face , would I be trying to impress?