You need to listen to Fox News to actually get it!

He was impeached for obstruction of a congressional inquiry. Mueller's report showed 4 instances of obstruction but could not charge Trump because of the OLC prohibition.

 

Trump was not indicted because the Republican led Senate refused to do their job. You just proved the extent of the corruption of the Trump presidency. They refused to hear witnesses, their minds were already made up.

And NO, there is no wall at the Southern Border of Mexico.

 

He was impeached for abuses of power. One of which involved the illegal extortion of Ukraine. The House proved the articles of impeachment as noted by 6 Repub senators in their statements explaining their votes to acquit anyway.

GAO finds Trump administration broke law by withholding Ukraine aid
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...inistration-broke-law-by-withholding-aid-from

 

Zero for one. Read your link. Too funny.

 

Zero for two. The read the articles of impeachment. Do your homework on Mexico.

 

Zero for two.

 

Zero for three. You are battling 000.0.

 

So you're claiming MEXICO is building a wall with Guatemala? Seriously? I think you need to look at a map.

 

Gosh. It proved you wrong. What the heck is the matter with you? Wait..........never mind. Too sad.

 

I sort of thought we'd reach the point where, in the face of overwhelming facts proving your positions are false, you'd look at the blue sky and assert the sky is green. No point in continuing.

 

Step one is the deployment of Mexican troops to their southern border. Included in that effort is to improve and add to the barriers that are in place.

 

And as I suspected - you didn't read your link.

 

When you have three strikes you are out. You can't continue to bat. Adios.

 

Muellers use of the word "exonerate" was unprecedented actually. No prosecutor ever uses that word because they don't exonerate. They can't due to the presumption of innocence that our justice system is based on. You can't exonerate an innocent person. The only time a person can be exonerated is if they were previously found guilty.

 

Yes, Andrew Weismann actually wrote the report and in doing so completely changed our system of justice based on innocence until guilt is proven to guilty until exonerated. This is Banana Republic “justice”. And this is the basis of the false claim that Trump was not exonerated.

 

Mueller's complaint and Barr's summary are irrelevant considering we have the Mueller report to look to.

 

And Weismann wrote the Mueller report like he was in a banana republic.

 

Oh. I see.... you responded to a post without even understanding what it was about.

Don't worry. It happens to everyb... Actually, now that I think about it... it always seems to happen to you only.

 

Please note the allegation you just made has never been proven. Further, it is debateable if it is even illegal. Since wiki obtained the podesta emails from a third source which it's founder says was not the Russians, and based on the Pentagon papers precedent, as long as they did not do the hack themselves, can legitimately publish it.

 

So you can’t actually find where he used the word. Why are we not surprised.

 

And only bottom feeding Republicans are OK with Trump’s actions

 

Sorry but he didn’t actually say that.

 

Is it really true that not one Trump supporter on this forum actually could be bothered to read the actual Mueller report?

 

I know why you want me to quote it. There's no point to for the simple fact that prosecutors do not exonerate. You can't exonerate an innocent person. You can only exonerate a person that has already been determined to be guilty. You can ignore this fact if you wish. But reality doesn't care about your fantasies.

 

Quote him...........