>>MOD WARNING<<<Nine die at black church in Charleston

But Obama ALREADY did that.He did in fact Assign a political agenda today.
Stressing the political need to deal with these kinds of gun issues.
Unless you were taking a nap and missed his address.Which he seemed
to be on Time fir.Unlike ANY Press Conference.
I challenge anyone to site an example where Obama was ON TIME for
any Press Conference.
His predecessor { President Bush was Never late for a Press Conference.}

 

this one appears to have been just that......a racist and a mass murderer

sadly these kinda people come from all walks of life, all backgrounds and come in all shapes and sizes

he could of just as easily of been a liberal, but he was conservative in this instance, I have no false beliefs that only Conservatives are capable of this kinda thing

in fact many of the people that killed white people for no reason were probably liberals... just reality

something in these peoples minds are broken and they will always find something to hate

.

 

Maybe Bush was never late for a press conference because the only other thing he had on his agenda was cutting mesquite on his ranch, or golfing with his chief of staff.

[video=youtube;Z3p9y_OEAdc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3p9y_OEAdc[/video]

Obama, as the President of the United States, is responsible for the security of this country. As such, he has an obligation to speak out against those who would use the 2nd amendment as an excuse to allow the carnage to continue.

 

no thats wrong........ your thinking of leftists

your avatar is a picture of you holding an assault rifle for hell's sake, the shooter was probably your best friend over at stormfront

 

3000 to Muslims and planes in one day, yet no calls to ban them?

Glad they caught this fool and if found guilty gets all thats coming to him. Its morons like this that invite more big mothering from govt

 

Which of course perfectly explains his utter concern of hometown Chicago,right.

 

I cringed when Obama mentioned guns during this.... had even one of those church members had a gun, they may have been able to save a few lives

it's like Bush talking patriot act after 911, taking away our privacy

we can't give up our freedoms and privacy for the sake of a false security

I am sure this is how people got alcohol banned in the past too, over reacting to some events

some people are now trying to even ban e-cigs in public parks cause they look too much like cigarettes, not because of any harm, just because they look too much like cigarettes, people always want to ban something, free countries can't go ban happy or we lose our freedoms bit by bit

.

 

what else should he say? other than then saying its so bad that this happened? Fact is gun laws prevent crimes and couldve prevented this shooting? what is the republicans answer or should i say the nra's answer? some psychotic answer like free guns for kids or something like that?

 

what kinda gun law would of prevented this?

and what restrictions would that have on our right to protect our homes and family......

.

 

No, you're just a racist.

A cowardly racist shot and killed those people -- period. Keep your racism to yourself.

 

Chicago has very strict (relatively speaking) gun laws. The problem isn't Chicago. The problem is the neighboring communities that don't have those strict gun laws. until the national laws become as strict, local laws aren't going to make a lot of difference.

 

if guns were totally banned I think there would be many more home robberies

.

 

it's called the gun show law only 10 states have it and the lack of a national law is blamed for most arms trafficking for example the majority of illegal guns found in nyc are purchased in kentucky, mostly from the gun show loophole. he was a felon and a drug addict

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ophole-that-allowed-dylann-roof-to-get-a-gun/

 

Are you suggesting that Japan has false security? Because they have the strictest gun laws on the planet, and we don't see these massacres happening there. And Freshair, recent research has shown that e-cigs do more harm than the manufacturers want you to know.

 

Wage a war on guns, making them illegal, and it will be as successful as the war on drugs. This is a delusion of the left, which I will not call liberals, for I am an old time liberal, and liberalism is dead, for there are so few real liberals like me left. The left isn't liberal, it's idiotic. Just as detached from reality as the far right is.

These mass killings are committed by mentally ill people. Racism itself is a state of mental illness. Mix regular mental illness with racism and you get killings like this. Apparently his own family didn't pay enough attention to him, for his father gave him a damned gun. I would know if one of my kids didn't need a gun and would never give him one. Well, they will suffer for their lack of attentiveness now, as will the families of those murdered by this insane person.

 

You don't have the facts. Gun laws do not prevent crimes-- PERIOD. Keep ignoring that fact at your own peril.

 

what did i say that was racist? or do you just scream reverse racism all the time to win the conversation?

 

in this case the father gave his son one of his guns

 

sadly I do not think it will be until we lose those rights that some will realize the mistake they are making

course even today some defend prohibition

prohibition of guns would create crime, not end it

.

 

which is legal as long as his father can prove he didn't know about the felony charge, it's also interesting why he would give a gun to his racist drug addict 9th grade dropout son who was arrested fairly recently while apparently planning to attack a bed bathand beyond. it is possible his father put him up to this, and that neither would ever pass a mental healthcare screening, currently back ground checks for mental health are considerably low and many people with delusional schizophrenia or severe drug addiction can purchase assault rifles

 

Keep reminiding yerself of that Einstein.
Because " God does not play Dice " right.

 

Title 23 Ch. 31 Excerpt:

Looks like SC law says no guns in churches.

And yes, it most certainly was a racially motivated crime.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/18/us/charleston-south-carolina-shooting/index.html

"From what she heard, the gunman reloaded five times."

Just so nobody decides banning magazine capacity will fix the problem.

" Roof had an unlabeled pill bottle with a drug believed to be suboxone, which is used to treat opiate addiction. Roof told police a friend gave him drugs. The status of the cases is unclear."

and drugs were involved. Suboxone is like an oral methadone, it's buprenorphine mixed with naloxone, nalaxone blocks the effects of injection of narcotics or if they're taken in huge doses, due to poor oral bioavailability, but it's still abuseable by itself. It's used to taper people off of other opiates who have developed a dependence on them.

 

they have less freedom.... I would rather live here

all the research that talks about harm talks about possible mishandling of the device and getting juice on your hands ect, I have seen none that says it worse then smoking, ect...

I have seen many quit smoking using them, they breath better, feel better from what I can see

I quit on them, then quit e-cigs, and I smoked for over 20 years

banning their use is like banning nicorette in public parks


.

 

Words have meaning. There is no such thing as "reverse" racism. You either are a racist or you are not. You just revealed that you are a black racist because your latest "tell" is using the term "reverse" racism. It is the black racist who believes that racism is about whites against black and for a black to be deemed a racist would be the "reverse".

Sadly, this is a real case of real racism and I have an idea that it is possible that this sick kid may have been embolden to take advantage of the recent focus on the racial divide that has been ginned up by all the race purveyors.

 

again what did i say that was racist?