GOP Won’t Include Planned Parenthood Funding in Spending Bill

If you think an unborn fetus is a baby then you have to use logic and call it an unborn toddler or unborn teenager....

won't it eventually BE a toddler or a teenager or a senior ?

EXACTLY like a fetus will eventually be a baby or a toddler or a teenager....


If you believe a zygote or fetus is a "baby" then you have to believe way back to when it was sperm....

 

No I don't and that would be totally illogical anyway. I have already fully supported the FACT that it is a baby in the womb is it not just something I think or make up.

It IS a baby.

Your lack of knowledge, I can no longer use the word ignorance, of biology is just blaring, stop digging your hole. Do you not even understand the difference between a gamete and a zygote?

 

Yup! They're not babies no more than a fetus is .

AND no matter what it's called it's legal to kill it .

 

They are as much a fetus as a baby the two are quite the same and I stipulated time and again it is current legal you do not have to keep repeating that. The question is whether it is wrong to kill those babies simply because they exist.

 

Good. If Liberals want Planned Parenthood funded, they can reach into their own pockets and pony up the cash.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Yup! They're not babies no more than a fetus is .

AND no matter what it's called it's legal to kill it .

Well, I let you go on about your terminology since it affects no one and NOTHING Not even Republicans in their funding


No, the question is NOT whether it's wrong to kill those babies simply because they exist, since there are no babies involved in abortion.

The question isn't whether it's wrong to kill fetuses... the POINT is , it's no one else's business what a woman does with her fetus.

 

"""""(CNSNews.com) - Despite promising to defund Planned Parenthood, President Donald Trump signed a budget Friday, which was passed by the Republican-led Congress, that fully funds the nation’s largest abortion provider.

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...l-gop-and-trump-fully-fund-planned-parenthood"""""

 

Nope babies and you have presented nothing to refute the fact it is a baby that is killed while have have supplied endless cites.

 

So?


"""""(CNSNews.com) - Despite promising to defund Planned Parenthood, President Donald Trump signed a budget Friday, which was passed by the Republican-led Congress, that fully funds the nation’s largest abortion provider.

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...l-gop-and-trump-fully-fund-planned-parenthood"""""

 

Everybody (who actually possessed a clue) KNEW that PP was going to be funded in the spending bill.

Did anybody actually think that PP wasn't going to be funded?

The idea of PP NOT being funded?

 

And............ Doesn't change the fact it helps fund killing babies and that there are not millions of women who would otherwise not receive healthcare without PP.

 

Yup, but my point in that to was to show the other poster that no matter what he calls a fetus it makes no difference.

 

Yes.

It has no "Rights" per se.

Sadly, many on the RW still continue to want to interfere with a women's choice.

 

PP saves the tax payers a LOT of money not just in welfare and medicare costs, but also in court/prison costs. As much as I hate the new budget that is one thing that should have been funded.

 

...and it was ....

 

I call it by it's proper name a baby and you have not and cannot show that is not the correct term while I post example after example after example after example after example after example after example after example after example after example after example.

 

By killing babies before they are born.............what a solution. And you can't even tell which of those babies will cost taxpayers money or will be criminals so let's just kill them all. You don't even do a means test like is the mother married and can financially provide for the baby, just kill it.

BTW there are long waiting list of couples who desperately want to adopt new born babies, do those babies still cost you taxpayer money and all end up being criminals?

 

The choice to kill her baby..............oh what a terrible thing? Many on the RW want those babies to live, many on the LW want to kill them. L610 just attempted to justify it.

 

W H Y do you want to "kill them all" ????

So YOU WANT to do a means test? And then if the woman meets YOUR approval THEN she can have an abortion?

NO one is obligated to provide anyone else with a child, baby or not......

 

No, the choice to kill her fetus, her body HER choice....women have the SAME rights that you do.....

 

HER BABY she wants to kill..............how lovely and what we all should support.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
No, the choice to kill her fetus, her body HER choice....women have the SAME rights that you do.....

Why do you want to support women killing babies?

What I support is her choice....her right to CHOOSE what to do with HER body. .

Why don't you want women to have the same rights you have??

 

That is simply not true. There are only waiting lists for SOME babies. Others, like black male infants, have a hard time getting adopted even if they are newborns and many states subsidize those adoptions from birth to encourage people to take them. Factor in the likelihood of them ending up in prison (30% chance they will if they are born today) and yes it is very expensive indeed.

Compare that to the fact that other kids often have to be 10 or 11 before the government will subsidize their adoptions because there ARE plenty of people lining up to take them even without any extra cash being throw into the mix.

Besides, paying a few extra bucks for someone ELSE to raise them isn't the answer. If people want to save every fetus they should be adopting several themselves.

 

For all babies and this has nothing to do children later put into adoption unless you are suggesting we kill them too.

 

Can you please rephrase that because I have no idea what you are trying to say.