13-Year-Old Girl Gets Publicly Shouted Down When She Compares Abortion To Slavery

WHEN were those "old days" ???


1100 AD, 1658 AD ? 1867? When was that "magical imaginary"" time...??

Did respectable MEN wait until marriage to have sex? If they didn't they weren't repectable , right???

….and what's wrong with that??

 

It says who gets abortions. They aren't all "party girls."

 

The right to life iapplies to non citizens also

 

No

They are human based on their DNA

Which is not exactly the same as their mother

 

.

 

Not if they're not born

 

Not if they're not born

 

Everything Hitler did in Germany was legal. German Jews also didn't have rights.

People who replace laws with moral principles (because they have none), are the most corrupt and dangerous. Because that signals that they need a law for them to tell them what is right and wrong.

I can only imagine what they'll do if we had no laws. If laws against rape or slavery didn't exist, libs like these will be the first to talk about how it's a right to rape and enslave someone because its legal.

 

Oh. So they are inside of a human but not part of that human. Like, it is a unique human being? So much for "get your hand off my body"

 

He's signaling that females are naive retards who men lead around by their noses, and for whom the notion of personal responsibility is irrelevant.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Everything does NOT have to be included in the Constitution

Fetuses have NO rights...and it doesn't matter if YOU think they do or not ….it doesn't matter if YOU think they are citizens or not.


Are anchor babies citizens BEFORE birth?????

I have no idea what that has to do with the post of mine you quoted except that "Godwin's Law" applies.

The Jews had rights, they were taken away....the right to their own bodies was taken away as Anti-Choicers want to take away women's right to their own bodies...I guess THAT is how this relates to Hitler and the Nazis.

HOW do people replace laws with moral principles if they have no moral principles????

Law does not determine what is right or wrong, it preserves order and safety in society.

Yes, if we had no laws Anti-Choicers would've taken away women's bodily autonomy and made them slaves long ago...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
No , human fetuses are human based on the fact that they are inside a human.

No, WHERE TF DID I POST THAT ????????????????


NO where.

Why did you HAVE to make up something??

"Like", it's human, NOT A human being. It is part of the woman....if it wasn't it could be taken out and let grow on it's own...

 

When a lib asks "what about the health of the mother". Remind them that as per Doe vs Bolton, "health of the mother" includes psychological, emotional, and familial stresses. In other words, "health of the mother" exception could be used simply because she is feeling stressed that day.

According to Justice Blackmun, the doctor’s medical judgment as to the health of the mother may be “exercised in the light of all factors—physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age—relevant to the well being of the patient.”

 

I get it. Pregnant women must then have 2 head 4 arms and 4 legs then. Because those limbs are "part of her"
Lol
No. They are part of the baby. And the baby is inside of the mother

If I took a triangle and placed it in a sphere, would I say that that triangle is part of the sphere? Or would I say the triangle is inside the sphere?
A toddler could answer this question.

They would grow on their own if doctors didn't inject a needle into Its heart to kill it pre-abortion. Libs now say it's ok to abort at 9 months. Seconds right before birth.

 

If you are referring to a fetus and it's inside the woman , it IS part of her.

If it is NOT part of her then it should be able to be taken out and grow on it's own and you have not explained how that can be done.

Irrelevant bad analogy

You are claiming that a fetus can be taken out of the woman and grow on it's own???

Then why don't more people do that and save the woman 9 months of UN-NEEDED (according to YOU) pregnancy

No, they don't.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
No , human fetuses are human based on the fact that they are inside a human.

So what other kind of fetus (besides human) would be in a human????

 

So according to you, Pregnant women must then have 2 head 4 arms and 4 legs then. Because those limbs are "part of her"
Lol
If I took a triangle and placed it in a sphere, would I say that that triangle is part of the sphere? Or would I say the triangle is inside the sphere?
A toddler could answer this question

If you knew what you were talking about, you'd know that there is something called viability. Viability is reached at at least 22 weeks old. Pregnancy lasts for 40 weeks

James Elgin Gill (born on 20 May 1987 in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) was the earliest premature baby in the world, until that record was broken in 2014. He was 128 days premature (21 weeks and 5 days' gestation) and weighed 1 pound 6 ounces (624 g). He survived.

But libs think it's ok for a mother to kill him simply out of convenience

Check virtually every presidential candidate and their celebrations for the laws passed in VA an NY allowing for 9 month abortions.

 

Dont move the goalposts

You wrote. “ NOPE! One cannot be a citizen without being born... Not mixing in science at all...“

Meaning you think the life of unborn children is not protected because they are not citizens

But illegal aliens are not citizens either

 

Using lib logic the womqn could remove a kidney and sell it to the highest bidder

Which we know lib women are not allowed to do

 

"The greatest destroyer of peace is abortion, because if a mother can kill her own child, what is left for me to kill you and you to kill me? There is nothing between."
—- Mother Teresa

 

I have asked libs the same question when they deny that aborting is ot killing an innocent human being

 

I didn't move any goal posts...just stumped you

Fetuses are not legal citizens because they are not even legal people until birth.

Illegal aliens ARE citizens of the country they came from

 

No

You hid behind the citizenship question

And illegal aliens are not citizens either

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
FoxHastings said: ↑
No , human fetuses are human based on the fact that they are inside a human.


So what other kind of fetus (besides human) would be in a human????

A fetus is NOT A human being (as in NOUN, as in legal person)...it is human ( ADJECTIVE) if it's in a human and NO ONE has said anything different.


Now answer the question:


So what other kind of fetus (besides human) would be in a human????

 

I'm not hiding behind anything.

WHERE TF do you think illegal aliens come from ?

OUTER SPACE?

NO, they come from other countries where they are CITIZENS.