8 Supreme Court cases the justices have yet to rule on

We aren’t talking about a loan on the property, he uses them as assets to get the loan to buy other properties. How many times do I have to explain this to you??

 

These are values used to claim these as assets for other loans. Not on the property he wants to buy.

 

The Clinton investigation can’t happen anymore because we ditched the independent prosecutor law that was used.
You told us he could fire mueller anytime he wanted. Clinton could not have fired his.

 

So you admit he tried to defraud banks but probably didn’t? That’s still illegal lol

 

Wow his lawyer says he’s innocent? Shocker!

 

when did i do that?

 

Obviously when you never said it. They're so desperate to get Trump on anything they'll lie their asses off.

 

You said businesses try to do that all the time.
And that is called bank fraud.
to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;
shall be fin

 

You have confused yourself such that no one could figure out what you are trying to say.

Depends, in this case the SCOTUS will decide.

 

Cohen testified that Trump claimed it as a business expense, which would be illegal. We'll see if the Supreme Court thinks that this, or whatever else the lawyers bring up, is enough. The other case involving Trump's tax records has nothing to do with judicial subpoenas, though.

 

Could trump fire mueller?

 

Yes he uses the properties as assets and he submits a value and the bank appraises and they come to an agreement, it is an agreed upon number. Why does that have to be explained to you?

 

When is it legal to pay an attorney for business related items and claim it as a business expense? The other case involving the House has to do with the House trying to subpoena them and they have no basis to do so.

 

Because lying is bank fraud.


to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;

 

When it is actually a business expense. Hint: hush money for your mistresses is not a business expense.

The law, as written, does not require any "basis." Whether one is required and whether the House can meet that basis if it is required is up to the SC to decide.

 

Specious

 

Is banging a porn Star a business expense?

 

Banks don't always audit the claimed assets, and if Trump misstated the value of his assets (such as using a higher value in his loan application and a lower value for the same assets in his taxes), that's a problem.

 

it’s not fraud when you get it appraised for a value and try to use that value.

geez

 

You can dodge but we already have you answer.

 

So he must have lied on his federal disclosures since the values differ wildly

 

And the investigation would have continued as Barr has said over and over, up to the AG not the President.

 

Right, it’s up the a guy the president can fire. Why are you restating your position while denying it’s your position?

 

That's on them, THEY DECIDE what value they will agree to. What asset declaration on his taxes? The government appraisal my property for tax purposes.

 

The AG could fire him and decide should the investigation continue. You claimed a President can only be investigate if he apporoves, nope.