I am new to this forum. But I'm here because of the continued new evidence which strongly shows that the 911 Commission was in the least inept, possibly with deliberate attempt, to alter the facts of the 911 event.....One needs only to view the report as submitted and test it's validity to understand that it is at best incomplete and misdirecting the truth with falsely constructed models and ignoring 100's of eye witness testimonies, police, firefighters, news reporters, etc. I believe a new investigation needs to start with the actual report...Enter real investigative facts, evidence, and eye witness accounts, the actual builders of the towers engineers should be subpoenaed with the original architectural blueprints and specs, employees of each company that had rented properties involved in buildings 1, 2, and 7 testimony. Video experts of all known sources and request the private sector to devulge what private video they may have.....In other words conduct a real investigation, not a cover up. The best to date argument is here......from 911Truth.org. https://youtu.be/Mf1ewgbq4fY "Published on Oct 6, 2016 JUSTICE IN FOCUS HIGHLIGHTS: Dr. Leroy Hulsey Testifies before Panel of Attorneys on September 11, 2016 Today, we invite you to watch Dr. Leroy Hulsey present the preliminary findings of his WTC 7 computer modeling study to the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. Dr. Hulsey is a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and the chair of UAFs Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. When asked by the panel of attorneys, On a scale of 1 to 100, how probable do you think it is that this building could have collapsed simply because of the fire? Dr. Hulsey stated categorically, Zero. Asked if he would flunk one of his Ph.D. students for turning in the kind of analysis that NIST did, he replied emphatically, Yes. http://www.wtc7evaluation.org Decide for yourself if the most grievous attack on US soil doesn't deserve an investigation......keep in mind that the Commission on 911 was not an investigation......it did not meet the criteria of one as defined by an investigation.....It did not investigate the steel, the crime site, the videos, the military, the airports, the witnesses, but instead produced a bogus model of how the buildings collapsed, an event that has never happened in the history of skyscrapers anywhere else on the planet. Many skyscrapers have caught on fire, never to fall.....mainly because they are designed not to. The commission was comprised of politicians of the current administration.......This is how wikipedia defines the commission.... The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, was set up on November 27, 2002, "to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11 attacks", including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks. The commission was also mandated to provide recommendations designed to guard against future attacks. Chaired by former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, the commission consisted of five Democrats and five Republicans. The commission was created by Congressional legislation, with the bill signed into law by President George W. Bush. The commission's final report was lengthy and based on extensive interviews and testimony. Its primary conclusion was that the failures of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) permitted the terrorist attacks to occur and that if these agencies acted more wisely and more aggressively, the attacks could potentially have been prevented. After the publication of its final report, the commission closed on August 21, 2004. The commission's website was shut down, but has been archived. Now there is a lot of misinformation there.....what they don't say is that any engineers were involved. It doesn't talk about the hundreds of witnesses whose testimonies were not taken. It places the blame on the FBI and CIA for not informing the administration, when there are congressional hearings on the subject on CSPAN that prove the opposite......Condeleezza Rice was grilled by congress about her role in passing the information to the Bush Administration....The day of 911, the Pentagon was in a practice simulation terrorist attack based on knowledge of a planed attack on the US by airstrike. This is all on video tape of congressional hearings...So why all the misdirection, why all the deception? A good question, with a frightening answer...if you call a lie the truth long enough, people will believe it....Hence Donald Trumps a few votes away from being president. Apparently calling for truth long enough doesn't afford the same effect. Finally, Dr. Leroy Hulsey has no bias, no axe to grind....he's an educator, a life long educator who has been a witness on some of the most dramatic cases of structural damage in the US...He was honored to look into the Building 7 issue for Truthfor911.org.....his findings, I believe are signal enough to get the populous to stand up and demand a new, a first real, investigation of 911. PS...I posted a similar comment on a political blog for 911, one I won't name here and was banned by the administrator, who also left a personal comment about my state of mind. I can only hope real patriots of this country do not lose patience, do not lose the energy to stand up for their 1st Amendment rights and do not become intimidated by those who would rather rule than debate.