Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

911 WTC World Trade Towers, Did Thermate do This?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Sep 21, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 21
  1. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah, with an 1828 dictionary. :mrgreen: Even though dynamite was not invented until the 1860s.

    Yet you insist that the definition for the word in 1828 applies to technology and practices that weren't even in use then and ignore the dictionary of the modern era. Pretty hilarious stuff there.

    But I guess you have to do whatever it takes to convince yourself.
     
    DDave, Oct 23, 2011
    #26
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    more specious red herring arguments.

    destroy
    demolish

    need no specific method

    Modern dictionaries after 19oo tend to only list popular usage which is NOT the same as meaning. You should know that.


    sort of blows that weak official fantasy crap from the propaganda pushers right out of the water.
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 23, 2011
    #27
  3. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Maybe you should look up red herring in your 1828 dictionary.

    Then if "pull" was a popular common term used to describe controlled demolition, I would expect to find it in a modern dictionary.

    But, alas, it's not there. So you can continue your gymnastics but it does nothing to make your point any more believable.

    By the way, did you ever bother to look up those other words I asked about in your 1828 dictionary? I'll refresh your memory since you seem to be avoiding it.

    pasteurization
    polygraph
    insulin
    penicillin
    television
    dynamite
     
    DDave, Oct 23, 2011
    #28
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Should I find a dictionary that pull is not in as well? and what would that prove that NEW words are created as needed? LOL



    [​IMG]
    ​
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 23, 2011
    #29
  5. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    In logic, "strawman" and "red herring" are two different things. Maybe you should look them up in your 1828 dictionary.

    New words are added every year.
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/info/newwords11.htm?&t=1319423826

    And popular usage IS meaning.
    A lot has changed since 1828.

    Oh . . . LOL
     
    DDave, Oct 23, 2011
    #30
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113

    oh yeh you can go backwards and show gay means homosexual and holocaust means genocide.

    popular usage is all too often nothing more than bs.

    a word catches on and every idiot repeats it because its so well rad of course. pun intended
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 24, 2011
    #31
  7. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who tested for thermite at ground zero?
     
    10aces, Oct 24, 2011
    #32
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Physicist Steven Jones.
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 24, 2011
    #33
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Question: How does one test for thermite?

    Dr. Steven Jones has admitted that his 'nano-thermite' paper was incorrect.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 24, 2011
    #34
  10. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nearly everyone who visited a doctor after the experience was given a medical check-up by that physician. To this date, not one person has been found to have inhaled thermite.
     
    candycorn, Oct 24, 2011
    #35
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Using what criteria?.....where was the evidence collected? did a third party verify that the samples were collected with an unbroken chain of evidence?
     
    LoneStrSt8, Oct 24, 2011
    #36
  12. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are you talking about?
     
    10aces, Oct 24, 2011
    #37
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Does that help?
     
    Hannibal, Oct 24, 2011
    #38
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why don't you email him and ask? You're interested in the answer to your inquiry, right?
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 25, 2011
    #39
  15. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No one person had unsupervised access to the 'samples', and where they came from was documented
     
    LoneStrSt8, Oct 25, 2011
    #40
  16. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So 9/11 Deniers don't even know what a "chain of evidence/custody" is? That has to be the least surprising thing I've read all day.
     
    BullsLawDan, Oct 25, 2011
    #41
  17. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just out of curiosity, is evidence presented by the United States required to have third party validation for you?
     
    happy fun dude, Oct 25, 2011
    #42
  18. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why wouldn't it?

    And how can you claim to have supposedly investigated 9/11 information, and then not know that dozens of sources studied various parts of 9/11 independently, and all came to the same conclusion as "the government"? (Since your question infers that never happened)
     
    BullsLawDan, Oct 25, 2011
    #43
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They consider themselves above the law and most people do not know the law so they get away with murder. no pun intended


    Emphatic NO!

    Validation is a signed affidavit stating each fact and testimony in court to the facts stated.

    anything short of that is trash.

    You will find that all so called facts are from an office of xyz and though a name may be attached they are not necessarily in a position to be held accountable, "the office is"! la dee dah!
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 25, 2011
    #44
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Signed affidavit means dick if the one giving it is a liar,there needs to be a third party with no stake either way...
     
    LoneStrSt8, Oct 25, 2011
    #45
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeh witnesses, but I only stated what is required by the court.

    look how big the gub is and they can keep their lies quite secret, but then knowing your family may get in a car accident because of your squealing is usally pretty good incentive to keep the mouth shut
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 25, 2011
    #46
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ahh,the old 'sinister government' excuse
     
    LoneStrSt8, Oct 25, 2011
    #47
  23. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think what you geniuses mean to say is, unbroken chain of custody of the evidence.


    Sheesh!
     
    10aces, Oct 25, 2011
    #48
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113

    oh no not at all every one knows gubafia is all good all knowing all loving benevolnet honest people sitting around the camp fire singing kum bye ya
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 25, 2011
    #49
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not a lawyer,but thanks for the correction
     
    LoneStrSt8, Oct 26, 2011
    #50
Page 2 of 21
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page