That's not what you said. You said it's either alive or killed by an abortion doctor. Pay attention to your own posts. Obviously there's far more options than those 2. But to a binary thinker, that does not compute.
FoxHastings said: ↑ LOL! Ya, brainwashing entities that want to force women to give birth. How about how righty politicians continually try to reduce funding to entities that aid CHILDREN, BORN CHILDREN, like Welfare ,SNAP, WIC, they even oppose healthy school lunches for poor kids... I'm not making it up....I can't help it you aren't familiar with your own party. Are you all for full and continued funding of entities that aid poor children?
I am quite familiar with my own party, which is how I know you are making crap up. And much of what you complain of is only necessary because your party insist on running businesses out of town.
FoxHastings said: ↑ LOL! Ya, brainwashing entities that want to force women to give birth. How about how righty politicians continually try to reduce funding to entities that aid CHILDREN, BORN CHILDREN, like Welfare ,SNAP, WIC, they even oppose healthy school lunches for poor kids... I'm not making it up....I can't help it you aren't familiar with your own party. Are you all for full and continued funding of entities that aid poor children? Sorry, but your lack of knowledge of what Republicans have been doing and trying to do does NOT mean it didn't happen... Are you all for full and continued funding of entities that aid poor children?
FoxHastings said: ↑ LOL! Ya, brainwashing entities that want to force women to give birth. How about how righty politicians continually try to reduce funding to entities that aid CHILDREN, BORN CHILDREN, like Welfare ,SNAP, WIC, they even oppose healthy school lunches for poor kids... I'm not making it up....I can't help it you aren't familiar with your own party. Are you all for full and continued funding of entities that aid poor children? Sorry, but your lack of knowledge of what Republicans have been doing and trying to do does NOT mean it didn't happen... Are you all for full and continued funding of entities that aid poor children? Your empty post refutes nothing
The NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 prohibits profit from fetal tissue. You are reading and believing FAKE NEWS! You need to find where your claim came from and strongly consider whether you can justify continuing to read that site. Your arguments faile when they are based on false claims.
No, everyone is interested in fewer abortions. The issue here is NOT about whether anyone likes abortion. This is about the methodology being used - laws against women. Again, let's not get confused here. EVERYONE would like there to be fewer abortions. And, it is WELL KNOWN that there are ways of accomplishing that without writing more laws against women. You need to get off this "laws against women" shtick and join those who would like to use other methods for reducing abortion .
Pro-abortion people do not say the aborted fetus isn't human. Nobody is claiming this. Strawman argument. Thanks for the question.
Some guy on the internet says you can only be one or another. Since the narrow minded opinions of guys on the internet don't mean anything to me, I am against abortion and think it is wrong. I am also against the government forcing my beliefs onto others. I guess that makes me pro choice.
At first I thought it was ridiculous statement, but I found the people who actually believe this tripe. Guess what demographic they're from?
These ambush interviews are always good for a laugh and those with some knowledge on the subject at hand can feel superior.....always a good feeling. Mr. logical is showing his illogic. Nobody but a person with serious issues is "pro abortion" and a fetus is not a "baby". Different stages of development. You don't call a toddler a teen. Of course a fetus is human but it does not have the rights of a born human because it is dependent on another human for life and that human has rights of her own.
I have never heard of someone being "Pro-Abortion" which would imply they are actively pushing for people to abort their pregnancy. I have also not noted anyone ignorant enough to dispute something inside the woman is not human, but I have heard this diatribe regularly put forward by "Anti-Choice" individuals.
Yes actually we do make that claim. But then if you want we can have a discussion as to what actually constitutes a human being.
Anything with human DNA is human. A red blood cell in my body is a human red blood cell and is human because it has human DNA.
Discussion? No discussion is needed. Just read the medical/legal definition. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8
They're no doubt cherry-picked interviews, but they are offering their opinions on when the life of a "human being" begins. That is a medical/legal question. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8
Tell me what demographic they're from, and tell me what proof you have other than your own personal biases. Did you notice how the answers changed when the question changed from "when does human life begin" to "when does life begin"? What do you think accounts for the change in the answers?
I think that derermination is open to question depending on you criteria for " human" if the criteria is just DNA then yes once the sperm and egg meet the result can be called human.
