The 3 big buildings coming down as they did was too spectacular. Allah was perhaps responsible. And if so, we are toast. It seems that number 7 and other buildings like that cannot survive a small fire. Those other big buildings who's infrastructure did survive fires, great fires, were miracles, obviously. Shouldn't the architects of building 7 be sued for not building a building like all of those other buildings that didn't come down as number 7 did?
ALL of the photographs from the day show that less than a quarter of the floors of WTC7 were involved in the fire, Given precedent skyscraper fires, I would say that the fires in WTC7 were NOT significant to justify the "collapse" as was observed.
Precedent is not "incredulity" Note that three buildings WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed. and the alleged cause of this complete destruction was fire and asymmetrical damage. So, the exact same result as is obtained by weeks of careful planning & execution of the plan to demolish a building is obtained by totally uncontrolled fires & asymmetrical damage ...... damn good trick, that!
and again ... kindly document how much ( if anything ) of the towers remained after the "collapse" event (?)
and without documentary photographs of what remained after the "collapse" exactly how is anyone to actually KNOW, the only thing available is the all too often conflicting testimony of people who were there. however the lack of actual photographic documentation of the site, speaks volumes!
the aftermath of 9/11 was the most photographed event in recent history,so really,you need to stop claiming it wasn't After all the photographer Joel Meyerowitz took over 5000 photos of the WTC site just himself.
and exactly how many of those pix are DOCUMENTARY pix that is having the exact location documented + the time & date for each pix? Why no pix of right after the collapse event?
Buy Meyerowitz's excellent book of photos on the 9/11 site and find out,Bob Spoon feeding you has proven futile in the past.
I have seen his book and really where is the pix that leaves no doubt as to how tall the rubble pile was? where is the pix that documents how much of WTC3 was left after the "collapse" of WTC2? There is a HUGE difference between doing a coffee table book and documenting a disaster.
Did the fact that he took over 5000 pictures go over your head? How many pictures are needed in your world to adequately 'document a disaster'?
The issue is your claim that the 9/11 event wasn't fully documented....if 5000 pictures taken by ONE photographer isn't enough,how many more is?
Documentary pix should show exactly the height & condition of the rubble pile post "collapse" This is a CRIME SCENE why was it not documented as a crime scene?
proving a negative is impossible however the fact that the opposition has yet to actually produce documentary photos of ground zero speaks volumes.
