Adam Schiff rejects reports that Mueller indictments are over, says special counsel could be called

Really?

That wasn't part of his remit.

So, anyone on this BOARD could answer that question!!

 

The last thing they want is Mueller on the hill. They are terrified of him.

 

his remit was to investigate Russian interference in the election and collusion that dossier was filled with Russian lies with the purpose to influence the election and Clinton colluded with a foreign agent who created that fake document


so how many witnesses did he call from the Clinton camp?

 

I suspect that's true.

Mueller knows a lot more than anyone else, I'd bet. No lawyer for the defense likes that.

 

Haaahahahahaaa!

Your hoax failed.

You seem to have pushed the hoax:

"Flynn was registered as a foreign agent representing Turkey. That is, while he was working for the "America First" political campaign, he was paid $500,000 to represent "Turkey First", including in a dispute with America.

He also received payment from Russia's propaganda network at the time and misrepresented his connection to Russia with VP Pence, who agreed Flynn needed to be fired.

Let's remember that the Trump campaign had contact with Russia through:
Jeff Sessions
Carter Page
Rex Tillerson
Michael Flynn
Paul Manafort
Roger Stone

... Along with his own various personal and business connections.

For more info on connections to Russia, here's a guide to help you start looking:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ies-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868"

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ll-you-condone.504339/page-21#post-1067483304

 

The Mueller remit is about coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Clinton wasn't associated with the Trump campaign and she isn't a Russian.

Also, there has been plenty on that supposedly "fake document", and what was found is that Nunes lied through his ASS.

 

Yes. Absolutely!

But, you haven't identified a hoax.

 

Really?

That wasn't part of his remit.

So, anyone on this BOARD could answer that question!!

 

Sean Hannity was right about the "fake news media, phony Russian collusion narrative" all along ... How does that make you feel?

 

We also need to see the material related to the FISA court applications, which was the start of this hoax.

 

Enjoy!

 

Hah, y’all are fuming today because your deity finished his report.

 

What do you think you're going to see that Mueller, Barr and Rosenstein haven't already seen?

 

Moment of triumph

Dirty Bob Mueller was forced to acknowledge there was no collusion, because 1) there was no collusion, 2) the charges Mueller brought against Trump underlings and associates did not involve collusion, and 3) the meeting with the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya proved there was no collusion, since had the Trump campaign been conspiring with Russian officials, there would have been no reason to meet with an obscure lawyer who claimed to have, but did not have, dirt on Hillary.

That meeting was another dirty setup by the Clinton campaign, since Veselnitskaya was in the United States on a matter in which she was working with Glenn Simpson, and she met with Simpson both before and after her brief meeting with Donald Trump, Jr.

 

For 7 years, Trump and most Republicans worked hard claiming Obama was a Kenyan pretender to the White House and, to a little lesser extent, his wife was a man!

To end their charade, without any with no more basis than the original string of lies, Trump and the Republicans proclaim Obama actually IS an American, and we should believe Republicans this time!

Really?

 

Who was the mastermind?

Was there a mastermind, or just a bunch of groups who happened to be working towards a shared goal?

Did the whole thing start as opposition research; then others grabbed it, saying "hey, we can use this"?

Who planned the Trump Tower set-up? The Papadopoulos set-up?

FBI, CIA, the Clinton campaign, and foreign actors were all involved. Did one person bring them all together, or did they act separately?

 

And he’d just tell them to ask Rosenstein

 

We were supposed to believe Loretta Lynch told the truth about the Sky Harbor meeting with Bill Clinton, but William Barr isn't to be believed?

 

I tried to tell you that anon sources suck.


No Collusion: 10 anonymously sourced Trump-Russia bombshells that look like busts
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-trump-russia-bombshells-that-look-like-busts


Rewind: Watch the Media Spend Two Years Hyping a Now-Debunked Story
https://news.grabien.com/story-flashback-dems-media-predict-mueller-probe-results-impeachme

 

Lynch is a product of the Obama (their savior) administration.

 

Adam Sh*thead needs to step down. He's on tape as saying that there is proof that Trump colluded which is a total lie and he needs to be held accountable for his malicious slander for 2 years. I want to see these people and the media held accountable for all the lies they spread 24/7 for 2 years. At the very least, sue them. But I want to see more than that. Has Swalwell ( Adam Schiff's shadow)decided NOT to run for president? If not he should and he should resign too along with Clyburn, Auntie Maxine and all the other loudmouth pieces for Hillary. After all, we know that The DNC and Hillary paid Steele and Russians to make up lies about Trump which was pedaled as the gospel for 2 years. The Democrats colluded with the Russians to throw an election for Hillary with the help of the Obama administration. They should ALL face consequences. Smart Democrats will apologize to Trump, but whoever said that Democrats are smart----evil, maybe, smart, definitely NOT. Now the Democrats must pay...

 

I like that verse too. Great analogy.

 

Some folks just don't know how to lose gracefully

 

Message to Schiff and the Cult of Leftness.


Caught On Camera: CNN Panelists Forced To Admit Mueller Report Is...

Now that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report has landed on Attorney General William Barr's desk, and it has been revealed that no collusion took place between Russia and the Trump campaign, CNN panelists are forced to say the news "vindicates" the president.

"So if, if as Jeffrey [Toobin] is saying, they [Trump administration] get great news, the great news is, first of all, there’s no more indictments," CNN political analyst Gloria Borger said on Friday. "But if suddenly the president has to say those angry Democrats who were working with Bob Mueller were actually just part of a Justice Department doing its job after he has criticized the Justice Department, then he’s now vindicated.”

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin agreed with Borger.

“Let’s be specific. This is really good news for a lot of people around Donald Trump. Donald Trump Jr. Jared Kushner. Jerome Corsi. The writer who had a draft indictment presented to him by Mueller’s office and they decided not to go forward with this," Toobin explained. "Let’s be fair here. There has been a lot of suspicion around certain people. And a lot of negative things have been said and imputation of criminal activity. Mueller has said, ‘I am not proceeding.’ There is no better news to receive than you are not being indicted by the United States government.”.....snip~


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethb...dmit-mueller-report-is-good-news-for-n2543582

 

His mandate included obstruction of justice and his requirement was to report to the AG and DAG all which acts would be prosecuted and which he would decline and why. No crime of obstruction found. No collusion fiund. No further indictments.