How many? Legislation is not science. When a zygote divides, it no longer exists, no matter how many laws are passed.
If the zygote and human are one in the same .. then why does the zygote reproduce asexually and the human sexually ? Since the two cells created after the first mitosis of the parent zygote are clones of the parent zygote .. do we now have two humans ?
So you can't show any support. We all knew that, but I just wanted to show again that you are still unable to provide support for anything you say. But by all means you may continue to jerk yourself linearly if that is all you can do.
You have never addressed this issue because you cant. Denial and avoidance is not addressing an issue... Where is the circular reasoning in the above post ? Your claim that this is circular is false and just a dodge; an excuse for you to deny the obvious.
So YOU would insist that they breed themselves into hopeless poverty with babies they can't afford to provide for?? Who do you want to provide for these children? Are you willing to support and educate them or do you want the State to do so?
So you approve of premeditated homicide for financial reasons? Again, so you approve of premeditated homicide for financial reasons? Again, so you approve of premeditated homicide for financial reasons? Seems like you want us to be like China and force abortions.
Not so much, most people (who are honest about what an abortion is) detest them and would not aprove. Ignorant people however...
But of course you can not prove that, only assert it as usual. On the other hand if we go back to grannies chart or the one you were so kind to provide not to long ago, then we all know that most people are OK with abortion being legal.
Yes, there are a lot of people who oppose abortion that IS true, but that is NOT what you said. So, are you saying now that you are correcting your earlier statement to state that there are a lot of people opposing abortion but not most?
You sometimes give answers, but when your answer and logic are refuted or shown false, you go into denial mode by ignoring the post or by restating your original premise rather than refuting the rebuttle or... just as you are doing now, by claiming, "I addressed that already".
You have shown a distinct inability to debate on the basis of logic. I ignore your ranting insulting posts often because they are so irrational and illogical.
You should try to learn from your mistakes rather than feel insulted by someone proving you wrong ... for example: You claimed that any noun after the descriptive adjective "human" was a human. Even when shown to be clearly wrong by examples, human heart, human cell, human feces (heart, cell, and feces are clearly not humans) you tried to defend your mistake rather than just admit you made a mistake. I am sorry if you feel insulted by having mistakes shown to you.
Actually I did correct that mistype and admitted to it. Resorting to making stuff up is never a good tactic cupcake.