As is yours...mine however has the benefit of documented and obvious accuracy whereas yours has...uh....you.
You have nothing of the sort. You have a completely partisan point of view. I don't. It never even had a crime to begin with. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-11/muellers-investigation-missing-one-thing-crime https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-03/exposed-naked-truth-about-robert-mueller https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-18/top-mueller-report-takeaways-so-far
I'd also like to know what part of Mueller's investigation went "too far." Was he not supposed to investigate the lawless president for his obstruction of justice, or what?
What is "way too far" and "stepping outside of what he should've been doing"? Those are rather puzzling comments.
What is "stepped outside of what he should have been doing" and "way too far"? You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
Not to people with common sense and some objectivity. Don't expect answers when you ask silly questions.
Papadapolous interview... it suggest Pres. Trump is holding more "trump" cards in his hand than I have supposed previously. https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/papadopuolos-spills-the-beans-on-new-spygate-player/
You mean the surveillance of campaign advisors doing questionable things? Hannity gives you your news.
So, you have no answers to questions which ought to be simple. As I suspected. You were making **** up.
You two should read this article: https://apnews.com/936b3fe969a540559ecc7503a547e2ad It's from a reliable lefty source. It has a number of interesting tidbits. I especially like this nugget about the 2008 election: "Eight years ago, foreign intelligence services “met with campaign contacts and staff, used human source networks for policy insights, exploited technology to get otherwise sensitive data, engaged in perception management to influence policy,” it said. “This exceeded traditional lobbying and public diplomacy.”" I don't recall any "collusion" hysteria, back then. Do either of you?
Thanks, that was a good read. Especially this last portion stuck out: Hackers sabotaged a website for Romney’s presidential campaign for a few hours in 2012, costing the campaign potential donations. In the 2008 race, Obama and the Republican candidate, Sen. John McCain, were targeted. One letter obtained by hackers showed McCain expressing support for Taiwan. China’s government presumably backed the hack. A Chinese diplomat called the campaign to complain about the letter — before it was even sent. China needs to be taken more seriously and if those idiots had not wasted 2 plus years investigating Trump over losing an election, we could be much further along. Instead, they seem to side with China and Russia over our own Administration. It's pathetic and goes to the root of the problem we have. Democrats are not just divided, they are literally traitorous to the United States. They don't care about the country, they care about getting power and keeping it. They can't legislate without getting a majority, drafting bills in secret and then passing them all based on lies. "If you like your doctor........" Congress needs to be vetted of people not interested in moving forward and letting lost elections go. Those that perpetrated the coup need to held responsible but we also need real legislation, not more nonsense from the left.
There was no illegal spying or coup attempt. Ridiculous. Again, read the Mueller Report and stop trying to cover for the con-man that you elected. Your response is another convenient rationalization.
Have you noticed that you never see the specifics on the "illegal spying" or the "coup attempt" claims? Maybe it's because those are nothing more than slogans and are a load of horseshit.
And amybe it's because there are volumes written about it which you just ignore. You start with Gregg Jarrett's book, or , even easier, you could open and listen to the link I provided earlier to hear from Papadopoulos, or any number of articles on how the FBI got FISA warrants with phony information. There is a real divide in this country and I don't see the Left giving an inch in their phoney narratives.
All this info coming from one of the perpetrators and articles written about "spying" rather than about our intelligence agencies doing their job. Trump has been flaunting the law all of his business life and now he is clean? No. I guess that all those traffic cameras at stoplights are just an excuse for the government to "spy", yes? There was ample suspicion to warrant surveillance and an investigation and thank goodness our intelligence agencies did investigate because a Trump's nefarious conduct was exposed in spite of Trump's stooge smoothing over the events.
Yesiree, dem Dems gonna investigate the investigator, cuz nothin sez insanity like doing the same thing over and over while hoping for a different outcome.
