Well, "give the number" certainly sounds like an attempt make the number sound large. Maybe you should've used "several" instead of using the phrase "given the number".
What world do you live in ? Oh wait, don't answer that, we know you live in TDS world So you think the Clintons should be cordial to Trump after he has spent the entirety of his presidency pushing the "lock her up" chants ? Are you serious with this post ?
I cannot be held liable for the effects of your misinterpretations. Fact remains: The electoral college worked as intended, as it always does.
How about for your own words? "Several" = makes sense in the context of what you later claimed that you meant. "Given the number" = suggestive of a larger number in the context of your post, something you later denied. Apologize to the communication gods, and you shall be forgiven.
Meh - what you popular-vote lovers fail to understand, no matter how many times you have it explained to you, is that if the way we kept score were based on popular vote, different people would vote in the election, PLUS the candidates would develop a whole different campaign strategy. You can't look at the popular vote under the 2016 election to predict the results of the 2016 election, were it determined under different rules. Why would anyone play to win under rules that didn't exist? They wouldn't You play by the rules. There are millions of republican voters in California who don't bother voting, because the D candidate will win the state, even if every one of those republicans voted. That, right there, makes up your popular vote difference. The same is true in every non-purple state. We have no idea how many people don't bother to vote because their state is going one way, and only one way, regardless of who votes against the state's chosen team.
Haven't listened to Rush in over six years and haven't listened to Hannity on the radio for over 12 years.
The popular vote does not matter. It's the States that vote and Trump won the States by an overwhelming margin. Hillary and her advisors should have known that going in.
Search Results Dictionary sev·er·al /ˈsev(ə)rəl/ determiner & pronoun determiner: several; pronoun: several 1. more than two but not many. I cannot be held liable for the effects of your misinterpretations. Fact remains: The electoral college worked as intended, as it always does.
I live in a blue state, a totalitarian state with one party rule, the Hermit Kingdom of California where the DMV registering non citizens to vote and California's elections have no integrity because the ballot chain of custody is broken by ballot harvesting.
The Clintons are bitter because Trump continues to personally attack them ad nausea. This has nothing to do with her loss in the election.
Why ??? Fox has a gay liberal with his own program. One hour out of the day you get a little taste of CNN.
Particularly since we learned today that he is funneling cash out of his 2020 campaign into his pockets. Not to mention the Saudis camped out in his hotel.
Crooked Hillary still has a whole crap load of unanswered questions that still need to be answered from her Cocaine Den in the White House as FLOTUS, uranium, paying Russians for a dossier, ****ing with Bernie, stealing furniture from the White House, getting the questions that were to be asked in advance for a Presidential debate from CNN and her hairy toes.
Neither are any of the adjectives you used. I cannot be held liable for the effects of your misinterpretations. Fact remains: The electoral college worked as intended, as it always does.
Yes, please do go on about how Sean is a paragon of truth and virtue. LMAO. All the networks have a small group of quality people, but mostly they are a cesspool of partisanship.There no longer exists any news source without bias, wrt politics. Need to know about an earthquake? Sure, they work. Any actual news from DC? Hard to get the real story - It's all finger pointing and spin.
You forgot about Bigfoot, Bat Boy, and Roswell. (Granted, the 3 things mentioned above make much more sense that the things that you referenced).
1. Sean Hannity There are many figures in media and on the air at Fox News that form what certain critics refer to as President Donald Trump’s “shadow cabinet.” Only one of them has phone calls with the president on a truly regular basis. When Sean Hannity isn’t chatting with the leader of the free world over the phone – they talk policy, media, ratings, and gossip – he’s speaking to him through his Fox News primetime show. Did we mention Hannity is the highest-rated cable news show in the United States? It has been for two years running. And not by any small measure. Hannity regularly notches a whopping three million viewers a night and sometimes breaks four. His three-hour radio show garners millions of listeners too, making Hannity a veritable media empire in and of himself. He has no shortage of critics who argue that his sort of advocacy doesn’t belong on a news network, but despite that Hannity has emerged as the king of cable news — after playing the long game over two decades at Fox. Pair that with a direct line to the White House, and there’s simply no one more influential. https://www.mediaite.com/online/mediaites-most-influential-in-news-media-2018/8/