Breaking: Court Hands Trump Win in Sanctuary City Grants

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Paul7, Feb 26, 2020.

  1. EMTdaniel86

    EMTdaniel86 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,380
    Likes Received:
    4,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Did you read it? Because you're sitting there saying biased dosn't make it so. There is cool trick where you can copy and paste parts of a aricle like a name, dates, specific places etc. and get alot of ino info. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/us/judge-shelley-joseph-indicted.html Oh look at that from the NY times.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2020
    ButterBalls likes this.
  2. EMTdaniel86

    EMTdaniel86 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,380
    Likes Received:
    4,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Double post
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2020
  3. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    44,941
    Likes Received:
    12,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What I don't like is the ranting around here about a single judge and then generalizing about liberals/Democrats/leftwingers etc. Just as sickening are people on the other side generalizing about conservatives. We're poisoning the country with this stuff.

    If a judge violates the law, we should prosecute because lawbreaking judges bring our justice system into disrepute.
     
  4. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    44,941
    Likes Received:
    12,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You might take a look:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act

    I'm not saying the Feds should, just that they could.
     
  5. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    44,941
    Likes Received:
    12,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They probably can't withhold the money legally, but they can make life miserable.
     
  6. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    44,941
    Likes Received:
    12,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Some forms of coercion are legal, others not. What else is news?
     
  7. Rugglestx

    Rugglestx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2018
    Messages:
    4,161
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Beto, is that you? What happen my man, I expected up there on that debate stage last night...
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  8. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    44,941
    Likes Received:
    12,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Obstructing and not assisting are different matters. Obstructing is against the law.
     
    Marcotic likes this.
  9. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    44,941
    Likes Received:
    12,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sorry about you not liking reality.

    P.S. Beto is a flake.
     
  10. Rugglestx

    Rugglestx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2018
    Messages:
    4,161
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's not reality. Beto said it once and killed his political asperations.
     
  11. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    44,941
    Likes Received:
    12,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    True or not, it's a one-off. In a nation of 320m people.
     
  12. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,180
    Likes Received:
    20,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    AG Barr only prosecutes those who he feels safe to prosecute.
     
  13. Quasar44

    Quasar44 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Messages:
    2,939
    Likes Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  14. Quasar44

    Quasar44 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Messages:
    2,939
    Likes Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Due to chain migration.: we will be at a half billion soon
     
  15. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    11,882
    Likes Received:
    2,871
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Excuse you?

    The confederacy didn’t nullify federal law. The union did so when the northern states violated the constitution. As ruled in two separate instances by the SCOTUS.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2020
    SkullKrusher and Libby like this.
  16. rkhames

    rkhames Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    Messages:
    5,227
    Likes Received:
    1,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The ruling by the 2nd Court of Appeal ensures that the SCOTUS will hear this case dealing with sanctuary cities. Which will rule in favor of the Trump Administration.

    As far as the Federal Government withholding fed funds for failure to comply with Federal laws, that has already been done.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...vernment-held-highway-funding-hostage/454167/
     
  17. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Constitution was amended to end slavery, so it is a moot point.
     
  18. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    11,882
    Likes Received:
    2,871
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which was also unconstitutional. So not really moot.
     
  19. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This thread is about the court saying they in fact can
     
  20. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody is demanding that. Read the opinion
     
  21. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was unconditional to amend the constitution to end slavery??
     
  22. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
  23. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I checked out of this conversation 10 minutes ago.
     
  24. perotista

    perotista Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2014
    Messages:
    16,981
    Likes Received:
    5,731
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That doesn't surprise me one bit. The courts have always or mostly always ruled in favor of federal over state. Federal takes precedence over state laws.

    In the past it has been on topics such as abortion, civil rights, voting rights etc. Now its on immigration. A change of who are for states rights from right to the left side of the political spectrum.
     
  25. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    11,882
    Likes Received:
    2,871
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That’s correct. In order to amend the constitution the northern states and federal government denied the southern states suffrage in the senate. They refused to allow them any representation until they signed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments.

    An action which is expressly forbidden by the constitution in order to pass a constitutional amendment.
     

Share This Page