Breaking: Kavanaugh accused of participating in several gang rapes

I did not hear all that, but obviously, she was comparing Kellyanne's statement to that of Dr. Ford's statement. Neither woman
told the whole story, because many women don't remember or don't want to rehash it. Mika is angry since she was sexually assaulted,
and it is understandable. Maybe not to you, but to anybody with a smidgen of compassion and empathy for others, yes. This was not a political statement and Mika was simply reliving the horror of her attack.

 

Others think she was being a complete bitch to a sexual attack survivor who showed the courage to come forward.

 

Yes she should be but these lying women never actually are. So you can't say it would like "any ****ing liar" because the liars still get off scot free. The Duke lacrosse liar never received an ounce of punishment in her attempt to completely destroy the lives of 3 innocent young men (yes I know she's in jail now, but that's for a completely separate matter). The Virginia fraternity liar never got an ounce of punishment either.

 

What happened to presumption of innocence? Innocent until proven guilty?

The Republicans I saw speaking about it said they all believed Ford, they think her memory is flawed about it being Brett. Are you saying they are scumbag liars?

 

Uh, the Duke lacrosse liar and the Virginia fraternity liar were proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt based on what eventually came out. And they suffered zero consequences whatsoever.

Seriously, read a newspaper article every once in a while.

Am I saying Ford is a scumbag liar? Absolutely I am. But I also understand how that is not a politically expedient position to take.

 

Isn't that more about the Prosecutor and not the crack whore?

What newspaper(s) do you read?

Ahh, so no presumption of innocence unless, what? It's a Republican? A Republican male? A male? Why do you think Brett deserves presumption of innocence but you've convicted Ford of being a "scumbag liar"?

 

Kavanaugh was supposed to simply withdraw, like men of lesser will and nerve would have after the first or second pounding.

When it became clear he was in it for all 26 miles, 385 yards, that was a big problem.

 

I am happy to answer your questions but you're really going to have to start making sense.

BTW, why are you so obsessed with me and following me around everywhere I go? You have replied to (and put words in my mouth) for every single post I have made this evening. What, do you get a notification every time I make a post that you just HAVE to respond to?

 

Then skip anything I say because that's as good as it gets. Have a good day.

 

Too bad all your post (and his raping women) did was give Republicans another reason to vote in his favor worship him even more....

 

THE INTEMPERANCE OF THE LAW PROFESSORS’ “JUDICIAL TEMPERANCE” LETTER:

“To think, just a few short weeks ago, we were getting lectured about how unfair, sexist, and racist it was to judge a woman for expressing anger during a tennis game.”​

That’s different, because shut up. But judicial temperance means being temperate when judging. It doesn’t mean a judge can’t curse if he hits his thumb with a hammer in his garage. Or if political opportunists are pushing bogus charges of gang-rape for sleazy reasons. You want a judge to get angry in the face of manifest injustice.

 

Yeah, people like you. Mika was also a sexual attack survivor who had the courage to come forward and she could not understand how Kellyanne would swallow her horror and support a sexual abuser solely for job retention.

 

It is also not a humane position to take.

 

Agreed, but mainly it's unconstitutional to declare someone guilty before innocent and not allow them a presumption of innocence. That's the dilemma many Alt-Righters have painted themselves into: they scream about presumption of innocence then declare all the women involved as guilty lying whores who deserved what they got.

 

If they can't get their story straight, if they are repeatedly caught lying (the fear of flying, the polygraph, the 2nd front door, inability to contact the authorities, the interview at her place...), if all witnesses named by them unequivocally refute their claims under oath, if the timing of their allegations is extremely politically convenient and their tactic of delaying the process is extremely politically convenient and yet there is not one shred of verifiable evidence - they are indeed guilty lying political whores. One has to completely disconnect one's common sense and critical thinking to avoid this conclusion.

 

Exhibit A.

 

That's because when Mika was attacking Kellyanne, Mika was being a lying bitch.

 

There is such a thing as righteous anger.

 

Dems like quiet Lynch Mob victims, not ones that fight back and defeat them.

Democrats are Filthy Liars and a Cancer on the Republic

 

What a dark stain on the future SCOTUS.

 

Hahaha! You chose one that hasn't aged well. Avenetti most recently, issued a challenge that Kavanaugh should sue. I'd wondered why an ambulance chaser like Avenetti hadn't already filed suits himself. Kavanaugh of course, but the universty too right? "Rape culture" on campus? Swetnick hasn't, suspect won't, file any criminal or civil complaint. Broke ass Avenetti wants to force Swetnick into defending herself!

 

Try to focus, Avenetti is not a SCOTUS pick with blackout drunken criminal episodes.

 

I've said what Avenetti is ... and pointed out the foolishness of suggesting the least credible phony allegation stains the SCOTUS. Wan't a verifiable "blackout drunk" stain for your scrapbook of delusions? No prob ... RGB in her SCOTUS robe, admittedly drunk and passed out. You're welcome.

 

That's because anybody who is not on your "side" is a lying bitch. Flock women? nah.

 

So unable to focus on the thread topic per the usual. Kavanaugh & his blackout criminal episodes is going to be a permanent stain on SCOTUS. His appointment is illegitimate, get out and vote in massive numbers to counter any RU mid term election rigging people.